Medaeops edwardsi Guinot, 1967
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.26107/RBZ-2021-0065 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:66CD6BC0-B64A-4E01-8B21-82061D9DC342 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038C3420-FF84-FFFA-AEAE-FB6F0A5CFC6C |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Medaeops edwardsi Guinot, 1967 |
status |
|
Medaeops edwardsi Guinot, 1967 View in CoL
( Fig. 4 View Fig )
Medaeops edwardsi Guinot, 1967: 369 View in CoL , figs. 33, 42; 1971: 1073 (type locality: Malabar Coast, SW India). — Serène, 1984: 92, fig. 53, pl. 12 fig. E. — Ghani & Tirmizi, 1992: 54, fig. 20. — Ng et al., 2008: 199 (list). — Naderloo, 2017: 260, figs. 21.34, 21.35.
Material examined. 1 female, 24.5 × 15.7 mm ( ZRC 1996.2637 View Materials ), Singapore, Pasir Ris, coll. P. K. L. Ng, April 1982 .
in the present specimen ( Fig. 2A View Fig ), similar to that seen in a smaller specimen from Okinawa (cf. Maenosono, 2021: figs. 1E, 3A), whereas in other specimens, the dorsal border either curves laterally ( Davie & Turner, 1994: fig. 1A; Naderloo, 2017: fig. 21.25) or, as in large individuals, recurves anteriorly Remarks. Guinot (1967) described Medaeops edwardsi based on a male specimen from the Malabar Coast, southwestern India, and a female specimen purportedly from Madagascar (see also Serène, 1984). Ghani & Tirmizi (1992) subsequently reported several specimens from the coast of Pakistan on the Arabian Sea. Mendoza et al. (2009) reported a specimen of M. edwardsi included among the type material of M. granulosus ( Haswell, 1882) , which had been collected from Queensland, Australia. The present specimen from Pasir Ris, Singapore, was found in the ZRC misidentified as “ Macromedaeus distinguendus ”. It agrees well with the figures and description of M. edwardsi , particularly in having the transversely subovate, fan-shaped carapace, where the anterolateral margin is divided into four denticulate lobes (not teeth) separated by thin fissures ( Fig. 4A View Fig ), the relatively sharp (not spoon-tipped) fingers of the chelae ( Fig. 4G View Fig ; seen in the minor chela only as the fingertips have been broken off in the major chela) and the presence of a short tomentum on the dorsal carapace and pereopods ( Fig. 4F–H View Fig ), although much of this tomentum has been abraded off in the process of brushing the specimen clean of debris (cf. Guinot, 1967: fig. 33; Serène, 1984: pl. 12 fig. E; Ghani & Tirmizi, 1992: fig. 4; Naderloo, 2017: fig. 21.34). The present specimen differs, however, in having the frontal median cleft gaping wider (it is a narrow cleft in the holotype), and having larger and more prominent denticles on the carapace anterolateral margin (much smaller in the holotype) ( Fig. 4A View Fig ). However, these morphological differences seen in a single specimen are not sufficient to make taxonomic distinctions, not unless more material is collected and these differences are seen to be consistent. The vulvae ( Fig. 4E View Fig ) are also shown here for the first time: they are oval in outline, and open mesially and upward. The sixth sternite on which they are placed has the mesial portion being angular and projecting and abruptly intercepting the fifth sternite, arresting its progress toward the midline of the thoracic sternum.
Medaeops edwardsi is currently known from the Malabar Coast of India (type locality) and possibly Madagascar ( Guinot, 1967; Serène, 1984), Pakistan ( Ghani & Tirmizi, 1992), eastern Australia ( Mendoza et al., 2009), the Gulf of Oman ( Naderloo, 2017), and now also from Singapore.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Medaeops edwardsi Guinot, 1967
Mendoza, Jose Christopher E. 2021 |
Medaeops edwardsi
Naderloo R 2017: 260 |
Ng PKL & Guinot D & Davie PJF 2008: 199 |
Ghani N & Tirmizi NM 1992: 54 |
Serene R 1984: 92 |
Guinot D 1967: 369 |