Blaiseus hainanensis Qiu et Douglas, 2017
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.25221/fee.343.1 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038C6420-CD72-1573-FF15-73430976FB7A |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Blaiseus hainanensis Qiu et Douglas |
status |
sp. nov. |
Blaiseus hainanensis Qiu et Douglas , sp. n.
Figs. 1, 2 View Figs 1–3 , 4–27 View Figs 4–14 View Figs 15–20 View Figs 21–24 View Figs 25–29
MATERIAL EXAMINED. Holotype – male, China: Hainan: Mingfenggu , Mt.
Jianfengling, Ledong County, 990–1000m, 24.IV 2015, leg. Lu Qiu. Paratype: 1
male, same data as the holotype.
DIAGNOSIS. This species has similar male genitalia to Blaiseus daklakensis
Douglas but can be easily distinguished by the following characteristics: 1) body dark brown, with yellow-brown antennae and legs, elytra with elongate yellowbrown patches ( Figs 1, 2 View Figs 1–3 ), while B. daklakensis has body pale red-brown, with pale legs and abdomen, elytral colour uniform ( Fig. 3 View Figs 1–3 ); 2) punctures on pronotal disk separated by less than their diameter ( Fig. 12 View Figs 4–14 ); separated by more than their diameter in B. daklakensis; 3) antennae reaching beyond metacoxae, while antennae only reaching metacoxae in B. daklakensis; 4) dorsal apex of parameres with shallow pits ( Fig. 27 View Figs 25–29 , arrows), while dorsal apex protruded in H. daklakensis ( Figs 28, 29 View Figs 25–29 ,
arrow).
view; 2 – ventral view; 3 – B. daklakensis, male holotype, dorsal view (kept in Bernice P.
Bishop Museum, Honolulu, Hawaii, U.S.A.).
DESCRIPTION. Male. Body length 7.8–8.1 mm, elytra length 5.7–5.8 mm,
pronotum length 1.7–1.8 mm, pronotum width 2.0– 2.2 mm, antenna length 6.0–6.1
mm.
Body with yellow-brown pubescence, elytra with weak metallic reflection, dark brown with elongate yellow stripes at humeri, along suture and the 6th interval on apical half; head, thorax and abdomen dark brown, antennae and legs yellow-brown
( Figs 1, 2 View Figs 1–3 ).
Head sparsely pubescent ( Figs 4, 6 View Figs 4–14 ), densely covered with large punctures, midanterior surface slightly depressed ( Fig. 11 View Figs 4–14 ). Antennae ( Fig. 17 View Figs 15–20 ) exceeding metacoxae by length of antennomere 11 ( Figs 1, 2 View Figs 1–3 ); labrum small ( Fig. 7 View Figs 4–14 ), flat in lateral profile, nasale with round pits antero-mesad of antennal fossae.
Prothorax: pronotum sparsely with pubescence except mid-anterior area ( Figs 6 View Figs 4–14 ,
15 View Figs 15–20 ), punctures on pronotal disk separated by less than their diameter ( Fig. 12 View Figs 4–14 ). Posterior edge of pronotum with 2 apices mesally; hypomeron with hind edge sinuate immediately meso-ventrad of hind angles ( Figs 5, 8 View Figs 4–14 ). Prosternum with ventral surface of prosternal process surface not carinate laterally ( Fig. 9 View Figs 4–14 , arrow).
ventral view; 6 – head and pronotum, anterolateral view; 7 – head, anterior view; 8 – prothorax,
lateral view; 9 – prosternal process (arrow), ventral view; 10 – metacoxal plate (outlined); 11 –
punctures of frons; 12 – punctures on pronotal disc; 13 – punctures of elytral disk; 14 – side of elytron.
Pterothorax: scutellar shield with posterior apex pointed ( Fig. 16 View Figs 15–20 ). Elytra not upturned at apex; punctures unequal-sized, round or elongate ( Fig. 13 View Figs 4–14 ); interval 5
costate on apical third; epipleurae irregularly serrate ( Fig. 14 View Figs 4–14 ). Hind wings with
4
antennomeres 3 to 11; 18 – protibia and tarsus; 19 – mesotibia and tarsus; 20 – metatibia and tarsus. ( Figs 18, 19, 20 View Figs 15–20 under the same scale).
Legs ( Figs. 18–20 View Figs 15–20 ): femora and tibiae expanded (fossorial); protibiae with posterior tooth at apex but not at midlength; tarsomere 4 weakly lobed; metacoxa sudden narrowed at basal third ( Fig. 10 View Figs 4–14 ).
ventral view; 26 – dorsal view; 27 – close-up, ventral view; 28, 29 – B. daklakensis: 28 –
original figure in Douglas (2009) , from the paratype, dorsal view; 29 – holotype, dorsal view.
( Figs 25, 26, 28 View Figs 25–29 under the same scale, 29 not to scale).
Abdomen: abdominal segment 8 with tergite normal ( Fig. 21 View Figs 21–24 ), and ventrite non-
lobed ( Fig. 22 View Figs 21–24 ); segment 9 with tergite and ventrite fused anterad, ventrite with apex round, tergite well sclerited laterally ( Figs 23, 24 View Figs 21–24 ).
Male genitalia ( Figs 25–27 View Figs 25–29 ): median lobe broadest near apex, apex slightly protruded, sides concave throughout basal 3/4 of free portion; parameres with ventral apices slightly shorter than dorsal (setose) lobes; inner parameres sclerotized; apex of dorsal lobes with shallow pits ( Fig. 27 View Figs 25–29 , arrows).
Female unknown.
DISTRIBUTION. China: Hainan ( Fig. 31 View Figs 30–31 ).
NATURAL HISTORY. Specimens were observed lying on leaves of shrubs at night in the rainforest of Mt. Jianfengling ( Fig. 30 View Figs 30–31 ).
ETYMOLOGY. The species epithet derives from the type locality Hainan Island ,
in China.
31 – map of Hainan Island (red circle indicates the type locality of the new species) .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |