Goliathopsis cervus Janson, 1881
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4789.1.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CA5C0D09-B499-4077-873F-BF5B55C504B2 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038C87C7-CE03-FFBA-FF0B-F99BFAECFE54 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Goliathopsis cervus Janson, 1881 |
status |
|
Goliathopsis cervus Janson, 1881
( Figs. 5 View FIGURES 1–12 , 13 View FIGURES 13–21 , 22–23 View FIGURES 22–37 , 52–57 View FIGURES 38–53 View FIGURES 54–57 , 89–90 View FIGURES 89–102 , 103–108 View FIGURES 103–108 , 164 View FIGURE 164 )
Goliathopsis cervus Janson, 1881: 610 (type locality: Siam [= Thailand]), plate XI, fig. 4 ♂, 5 ♀; Bergé 1884: 158; Gestro 1888: 119, fig. ♂ (horn); Fairmaire 1893b: 316; Arrow 1910: 206 (synonymized with G. despectus ); Janson 1917: 110 (status revalidated); Schenkling 1921: 364 (in synonymy G. despectus ); Krikken 1977: 314 (lectotype designated); Antoine 1991: 9 (status resurrected); Krajčík 1999: 39; Krajčík 2012: 116.
Type material. As Janson (1881) stated in the original publication, this species was originally described from Thailand based on a pair of specimens. The type specimens now are preserved in RMNH, and the male was designated as lectotype by Krikken (1977). Due to RMNH is still closed for collection integration (Jan Krikken, personal com-
munication, 2019), the female paralectotype is unavailable for the present work, and the male lectotype was simply examined by photographs ( Figs. 103–108 View FIGURES 103–108 ): Goliathopsis cervus, Jans. , Type , Siam // ♂ TYPE .
Other material examined (2♂♂, 1♀♀). THAILAND: 2♂♂ ( KSCJ), Khao Bandai It, Petchaburi Prov. C. Thailand, 2012.V.22, S.Tsuyuki leg. // Goliathopsis velutinus Pouillaude, 1913 , det. K. Sakai, 2015 [misidentification] ; 1♀ ( KSCJ), Khao Soi Dao, Chanthaburi, Thailand , 2012.V.17–21, K.Takahashi leg. // Goliathopsis velutinus Pouillaude, 1913 , det. K. Sakai, 2015 [misidentification] .
Diagnosis. Smallest species of the genus, body length 9.5–10.5 mm; width 5.3–5.5 mm. Dorsal surface and pygidium clad with brown tomentum ( Figs. 54, 56 View FIGURES 54–57 , 103, 106 View FIGURES 103–108 ). Midline on pronotum and scutellum yellow, distinct. Elytron usually with two light brown maculae (not distinct): a small one on posthumeral area, sometimes absent; the other small one on the mediodiscal area near sutural costa. Disc of elytron with U-shaped (few drop-shaped), setiferous punctures ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 1–12 ); setae short. Pygidium with small, rounded, setiferous punctures ( Figs. 22–23 View FIGURES 22–37 ). Cephalic horns of male small and slender, inner side with tomentum, not constricted at base and not distinctly expanded at apex ( Figs. 13 View FIGURES 13–21 , 103 View FIGURES 103–108 ). Male genitalia small ( Figs. 52–53 View FIGURES 38–53 ), proximal and distal parts of parameres gradually expanded in apical view, medially constricted, apex rounded and inner side slightly curved; parameres slightly curved in lateral view, basal piece broad.
This species is closed to G. velutinus , but body size distinctly smaller ( Figs. 89–90 View FIGURES 89–102 ); cephalic horns smaller and not constricted at base ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 13–21 ; larger and constricted at base in G. velutinus , Fig. 21 View FIGURES 13–21 ); punctures on elytral disc usually U-shaped ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 1–12 ; usually drop-shaped in G. velutinus , Fig. 12 View FIGURES 1–12 ); parameres smaller and distal parts gradually expanded ( Fig. 52 View FIGURES 38–53 ; larger and distinctly expanded in G. velutinus , Fig. 42 View FIGURES 38–53 ).
Distribution. Thailand.
Remarks. Based on the good illustrations of Goliathopsis cervus in Janson (1881) , Gestro (1888) pointed out several differences between G. cervus and his new species G. capreolus , especially in the shape of the cephalic horns. Nevertheless, Arrow (1910) regarded them as the same species and listed both as synonyms of G. despectus . In response to Arrow’s treatment, Janson (1917) insisted on the validity of G. cervus and provided more differences between females based on a re-examination of the female type of G. despectus in OXUM. Unfortunately, this disputation was not mentioned by subsequent authors. In the most recent work, Antoine (1991) also treated G. cervus as valid species mainly by the difference of the tomentose area on cephalic horns and elytra according to the figures in Janson (1881). By examining the fresh specimens collected from southern Thailand and the male lectotype, several distinct differences from G. despectus are observed: cephalic horns of male smaller and inner side with tomentum in G. cervus ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 13–21 ; larger and glabrous in G. despectus , Fig. 14 View FIGURES 13–21 ); pygidium subtriangular in posterior view in G. cervus ( Figs. 22–23 View FIGURES 22–37 ; oval in G. despectus , Figs. 24–25 View FIGURES 22–37 ); parameres smaller and apex rounded in G. cervus ( Fig. 52 View FIGURES 38–53 ; larger and apex sharp in G. despectus , Fig. 48 View FIGURES 38–53 ). Consequently, Goliathopsis cervus is an independent species.
RMNH |
National Museum of Natural History, Naturalis |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Goliathopsis cervus Janson, 1881
Xu, Hao & Qiu, Jian-Yue 2020 |
Goliathopsis cervus Janson, 1881: 610
Krajcik, M. 2012: 116 |
Krajcik, M. 1999: 39 |
Antoine, P. 1991: 9 |
Krikken, J. 1977: 314 |
Schenkling, S. 1921: 364 |
Janson, O. E. 1917: 110 |
Arrow, G. J. 1910: 206 |
Fairmaire, L. 1893: 316 |
Gestro, R. 1888: 119 |
Berge, A. 1884: 158 |
Janson, O. E. 1881: 610 |