Goliathopsis lameyi Fairmaire, 1893

Xu, Hao & Qiu, Jian-Yue, 2020, Three new synonyms within the flower chafer genus Goliathopsis Janson, 1881 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Cetoniinae) from China, Zootaxa 4789 (1), pp. 91-131 : 113-116

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4789.1.3

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CA5C0D09-B499-4077-873F-BF5B55C504B2

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038C87C7-CE11-FFA4-FF0B-FF73FDD4F97D

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Goliathopsis lameyi Fairmaire, 1893
status

 

Goliathopsis lameyi Fairmaire, 1893

( Figs. 11 View FIGURES 1–12 , 20 View FIGURES 13–21 , 34–35 View FIGURES 22–37 , 38–39 View FIGURES 38–53 , 81–84 View FIGURES 81–84 , 99–100 View FIGURES 89–102 , 150–159 View FIGURES 150–159 , 164 View FIGURE 164 , 165–166 View FIGURES 165–168 )

Goliathopsis lameyi Fairmaire, 1893a : VII (type locality: Ha-Lang, Tonkin [= Ha Lang, Cao Bang, Vietnam]); Fairmaire 1893b: 315; Fairmaire 1904: 90, plate IX, fig. 5 ♂; Schenkling 1921: 364; Mao 1937: 1096; Paulian 1961: 6, fig. 338, ♂; Ruter 1978: 287, fig. 4 (parameres); Antoine 1991: 9 (in key), plate I, fig. 4 (parameres), plate III, fig. 4 ♂; Sakai & Nagai 1998: 156 (S. China & Cao Bang, Vietnam), plate 2, fig. 41 ♂; Krajčík 1999: 39; Smetana 2006: 300 (SE. China); Krajčík 2011: 70; Krajčík 2012: 116; Bezděk 2016: 391 (SE. China).

Goliathopsis maolanus Yang, 1988: 10 (type locality: Maolan Nature Reserve, Guizhou, China), figs. 3a-3d ♂ (cephalic horn and parameres); Bezděk 2016: 391. New synonym.

Type material. The type series of Goliathopsis lameyi belongs to a batch of beetles collected from Ha-Lang in Haut- Tonkin, but Fairmaire (1893a) gave priority to describe this new Goliathopsis by a short diagnosis. The remaining beetles were described later the same year in a long report ( Fairmaire 1893b), including a detailed description for G. lameyi . The markings on the pronotum of this species were specified in this detailed description: four maculae on the disc and a short stria in the medium of the basal margin. It is confusing that these markings were not mentioned in the original description. This species was later illustrated by Fairmaire (1904): the four maculae on the pronotal disc were exactly shown in the figure of dorsal habitus, but the short stria absent ( Fig. 157 View FIGURES 150–159 ); while the accompanied diagnosis and specimen information was the same as the original publication ( Fairmaire 1893a), except a few textual adjustments. Goliathopsis lameyi was originally described based on an uncertain number of specimens, but these inconsistent descriptions of the markings implied that Fairmaire examined more than one specimen, even though only a single measurement of the body length was given in these publications.

It is noteworthy that no conspecific specimens of G. lameyi were found in other European museums we visited, apart from the two males preserved in MNHN. One male ( Fig. 150 View FIGURES 150–159 ) was previously regarded as a type specimen of G. lameyi , but its type status seems to be doubtful. Fairmaire usually attached a handwritten label to his type with species name, but the handwritten identification label of this male does not match his handwriting ( Fig. 154 View FIGURES 150–159 ). Furthermore, “A. Lamey 1900” can be read on the date-locality label, but G. lameyi was named as early as in the year 1893. The reasonable explanation is that “A. Lamey 1900” is not the collecting data of this specimen, but is concerned with the original possessor of this private collection, Adolphe Lamey (1830–1907). As Fairmaire (1893b) mentioned, the beetles from Ha-Lang were actually collected by Captain L. Lamey (1859– 1946), nephew of Adolphe Lamey. There is a similar case on Valgus albiventris Fairmaire, 1893 . The type series of V. albiventris was collected by Paul Crampel (1864–1891) from Africa, while the lectotype designated by Antoine (1999) is a specimen attached a date-locality label with “A. Lamey 1907”. The dates appear to conflict because Crampel’s specimens were originally housed by A. Lamey until 1907 and then been transferred to MNHN ( Antoine 1999). Hence, this male Goliathopsis should be a syntype originally housed by A. Lamey, and later integrated into the collection of MNHN in 1900; that is why the letters “MUSEUM PARIS” were printed on the same label. Besides, the identifier (probably A. Lamey) wrote down “typique” on the identification label presumedly because the appearance of this male matches the original description: pronotum without the four maculae. The other male of G. lameyi in MNHN ( Fig. 155 View FIGURES 150–159 ) attached an identification label of G. Ruter was collected from Tonkin, and the markings on its pronotum perfectly matched the detailed description in Fairmaire (1893b). Nevertheless, this male cannot be treated as a syntype due to no more evidence to verify its type status.

To preserve further uncertainty of nomenclature, the male (Figa. 150–154) in MNHN collected from the type locality is here designated as lectotype: MUSEUM PARIS, Tonkin-Nord., Hâ-Lang, A. Lamey, 1900 // 140// Ann. Soc. Ent. Fr., Bull., VII., 1893 // typique, Goliathopsis lameyi Fairm. , nov. sp. (Hâ Lâng) // 338 [white label] // JK 77 PHOTO [Jan Krikken photo in 1977] // HOLOTYPE [red label] // MNHN, EC7180 [white label].

Type series of Goliathopsis maolanus Yang, 1988 were lost ( Fig. 159 View FIGURES 150–159 ), and the collecting data are transcribed as follows: ♂ (holotype), ♀ (allotype), Maolan Nature Reserve , Guizhou, alt. 600 m, 26.VI.1985, Jing-Hua Zhao, Qun Wang & Yan-Xian Liu leg. The date in the English abstract of the original publication is “ 26.V.1985 ” .

Other material examined (21♂♂, 5♀♀). CHINA: Guizhou: 1♂ ( MYNU), 2019.VI.12, Gengzao, Jia’ou , Libo County, 770 m, Lu QIU leg.; 5♂♂, 2♀♀ ( GFGY), 1985.V.22, Maolan, Libo, [Jing-Hua] ZHAO, [Qun] WANG & [Yan-Xian] LIU leg.; 4♂♂, 1♀ ( GFGY), 1985.V.26, Maolan, Libo, ZHAO, WANG &LIU leg.; 1♂ ( GFGY), 1988.V.26, Maolan, Libo, 540~ 700 m, ZHAO, WANG & LIU leg.; 1♀ ( GFGY), 1986.VIII.31, Maolan, Libo; 1♂ ( GFGY), 1988.V.26, Banzhai to Dongduo, Maolan, Libo, 540~ 700 m; 1♂ ( GFGY), 1990.V.14, Banzhai to Liming- guan, Maolan, Libo, 560~ 570 m ; Guangxi: 2♂♂ ( GXIP), 1985.VII.30, Nonggang Nature Reserve, Longzhou County, Tao ZENG leg.; 1♂ ( GXIP) , Guangxi, 1986; 1♂ ( SYAU), Yishan [ Yizhou of Hechi ], 21.IV.28 // Goliathop- sis velutinus Pouill. , det. Zhi-Liang ZHANG, 22.XII.1989 [misidentification] . VIETNAM: 1♂ ( MNHN), Tonkin // Goliathopsis lameyi Fairm., G. RUTER det. 19; 1♂ ( KSCJ), 1996.VI.25 , Cao Bang, N. Vietnam, M.Ito leg.; 1♂ ( KSCJ), 2000.IV.20, Border Yunnan , Ha Giang Prov. N. Vietnam; 1♂, 1♀ ( KSCJ), 2001.V, Border Yunnan, N.W. of Ha Giang Prov. N. Vietnam .

Diagnosis. Body length 11.0–12.0 mm; width 5.5–6.3 mm. Body black ( Figs. 81–84 View FIGURES 81–84 ). Pronotum usually with four, small, light yellow, tomentose maculae, absent occasionally ( Fig. 150 View FIGURES 150–159 ); midline usually absent, sometimes discontinuous ( Fig. 81 View FIGURES 81–84 ). Elytron usually with two, large, light brown, tomentose maculae: one on the median portion of lateral declivity; the other one on the postdiscal areas near sutural costa, sometimes split up ( Fig. 150 View FIGURES 150–159 ); few individuals with one small tomentose macula on lateral margin near anteapical umbone ( Figs. 99–100 View FIGURES 89–102 ). Disc of elytron with drop shaped, setiferous punctures ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 1–12 ); setae long. Pygidium without tomentum, densely clad with rounded, setiferous punctures ( Figs. 34–35 View FIGURES 22–37 ). Cephalic horns of male slightly constricted at base; inner sides with tomentum ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 13–21 ). Male genitalia large ( Figs. 38–39 View FIGURES 38–53 ), proximal and distal parts of parameres distinctly expanded in apical view, medially constricted, apex reversed and sharp; parameres near flat in lateral view, basal piece distinctly expanded.

The species can be readily distinguished from other species by the four large tomentose maculae on the black elytra ( Figs. 81, 83 View FIGURES 81–84 ).

Distribution. China: Guizhou, Guangxi (new record); N. Vietnam.

Remarks. Comparing with the dissected specimens of G. lameyi , the illustration of parameres of G. maolanus in its original publication ( Yang 1988, see Fig. 159 View FIGURES 150–159 ) shows no distinct difference, and they seem to be the same species. While, Yang (1988) claimed that G. maolanus can be separate from G. lameyi by brown setae on the pronotum. Goliathopsis maolanus was originally described from Maolan Nature Reserve in Libo County, southern Guizhou, China, but no more specimens have been reported so far. As mentioned in the acknowledgment section of the original publication, the type specimens of G. maolanus were donated by Ms. Chun-Mei Liang who worked at GFGY. Following this clue, several conspecific specimens in GFGY were fortunately found, and some label data conform to the types of G. maolanus . Obviously, they were captured together from the type locality in 1985. By close examination of these specimens and other material of G. lameyi from Guangxi, China and northern Vietnam, all specimens are confirmed conspecific and the setae on dorsal surface are black. Consequently, G. maolanus is treated as a junior synonym of G. lameyi .

MNHN

Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle

SYAU

Shenyang Agricultural University

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Cetoniidae

Genus

Goliathopsis

Loc

Goliathopsis lameyi Fairmaire, 1893

Xu, Hao & Qiu, Jian-Yue 2020
2020
Loc

Goliathopsis maolanus

Bezdek, A. 2016: 391
Yang, C. J. 1988: 10
1988
Loc

Goliathopsis lameyi

Bezdek, A. 2016: 391
Krajcik, M. 2012: 116
Krajcik, M. 2011: 70
Smetana, A. 2006: 300
Krajcik, M. 1999: 39
Sakai, K & Nagai, S. 1998: 156
Antoine, P. 1991: 9
Ruter, G. 1978: 287
Paulian, R. 1961: 6
Mao, Y. T. 1937: 1096
Schenkling, S. 1921: 364
Fairmaire, L. 1904: 90
Fairmaire, L. 1893: 315
1893
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF