Cyzicus

Padhye, Sameer, Rabet, Nicolas & Ghate, Hemant, 2015, First faunal inventory of large branchiopods (Crustacea: Branchiopoda) of Western Maharashtra, India with taxonomical and distributional comments, Zootaxa 3904 (2), pp. 208-222 : 212-213

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3904.2.2

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:676DA9F1-F2C1-44DA-ACCE-BDEAD7DBD7AF

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5687766

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038C87E9-FFD7-FFA3-59DF-FA9DFB28F807

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Cyzicus
status

 

Cyzicus View in CoL sp.

( Figs. 4 View FIGURE 4 –5)

Material examined. Five females studied from Dighi pools, Pune (Aug 2009).

Description. Female. Head. Rostrum roughly triangular, rostral apex pointed and slightly upturned. Ocular tubercle not conspicuous, eyes moderate sized and circular, naupliar eye elongated. Occipital crest situated at the dorsal/posterior margin of the head, conical and extended posteriorly; length equal to its basal width and with a deep gap separating it from dorso-posterior part of head ( Fig.4 View FIGURE 4 C).

First antennae. Positioned posterior to rostrum, about 0.6–0.7 times the length of second antenna. Pedunculate with sixteen irregular lobes with each lobe bearing a patch of sub-terminal and terminal aesthatacs (Fig.5 A).

Second antennae. Length twice that of the head. Base tubular, lined with transverse rows of plumose setae followed by posteriorly directed spines. Antennal rami with twelve (exopod) and thirteen flagellomeres (endopod) ( Fig.4 View FIGURE 4 D). Each flagellomere cylindrical with 4–5 long spines on anterior side and a longitudinal row of setae on posterior side (Fig.5 B).

Carapace. Carapace broadly oval in lateral view ( Fig.4 View FIGURE 4 A, B), reddish translucent in color, umbone prominent ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 B). Hinge line straight, with a single distinct stout apex at the growth line tip ( Fig.4 View FIGURE 4 B ‘arrow’). Anterior one third portion of the carapace margin lined with small, stout, curved spines ( Fig.4 View FIGURE 4 E). Numerous carapace lines observed (not counted) ( Fig.4 View FIGURE 4 : B), each line fringed with short bristles; bristles conspicuous along the peripheral growth lines ( Fig.4 View FIGURE 4 F).

Trunk. 16–20 pairs of thoracopods present ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 A). All thoracopods similar in structure but reducing in size posteriorly. Dorsal margin of the posterior body segments (lower half of the body) with a dorsomedial lobiform projection, tapering anteriorly and directed posteriorly to form a spine like apex (Fig. 5, C ‘arrow’). The lobiform projection lined with varying number of smaller posteriorly directed and curved spines (Fig. 5, C). The lobiform projection diminishes in size towards the end segments.

Telson. Postero-lateral edge armed with 18–22 roughly conical, curved and bilaterally serrated pairs of spines, distalmost spines twice in length than the proximal spines (Fig. 5D ‘arrow’). Postero-lateral edge ending in a stout, arcuate and acute, unilaterally serrated projection at least 3 times longer than the nearest spines (Fig.5 D ‘star’). Caudal filaments originating on an elevated and roughly semicircular mound between the second and third pair of spines of the telson (Fig. 5 D). Cercopods projecting posteriorly, cerci longer than telson with setiferous bristles covering nearly 1/3rd of dorsal margin proximally followed by a small serrated spine in the middle, and a row of smaller spines along the distal marginal border (Fig.5 D).

Male. Not seen

Size. Length: 4.08 ± 0.90 mm; Height: 2.8 ± 0.69 mm.

Known distribution: Seen so far only in habitats on the outskirts of Pune city.

Remarks. The genus Caenestheriella shares many characters with the genus Cyzicus and hence few authors have synonymized the former with Cyzicus ( Straskraba 1965; Brtek 1997) giving recent phylogenetic studies more evidence ( Schwentner et al. 2009). It is necessary to re-examine all the species described under that genus from India ( Rogers et al. 2013). This species was very rare and found in only one season. We were not able to find males, so comparison of male specific characters could not be done. Hence, because of lack of comparative material, dearth of reliable literature and absence of males, we report this species as only Cyzicus sp.

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF