Benthophilus persicus, Kovačić & Esmaeili & Zarei & Abbasi & Schliewen, 2021
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4980.1.3 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B136A181-ED9A-410D-A9E3-3CEB1F81A4B6 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4945539 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038D87D3-A805-FF9D-C1EC-F994718BFE2A |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Benthophilus persicus |
| status |
sp. nov. |
Benthophilus persicus sp. nov.
( Figs 2–10 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 View FIGURE 5 View FIGURE 6 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 View FIGURE 9 View FIGURE 10 , Table 1 View TABLE 1 )
Holotype. ZSM 47595, male, 45.2+ 9.9 mm, Iran, Gilan Province, Anzali, southern Caspian Sea , 37°29’ N 49°29’ E, K. Abbasi & S. Abdolmaleki, 01 Apr. 2004 ( Fig. 4a View FIGURE 4 ). GoogleMaps
Paratypes. ZSM 47596, female, 45.8+ 9.7 mm, Iran, Gilan Province, Anzali, southern Caspian Sea , 37°31’ N 49°30’ E, K. Abbasi & S. Abdolmaleki, 18 Nov. 2002 GoogleMaps . ZSM 47597, juvenile male, 30.4+ 7.6 mm, Iran, Gilan Province, Anzali, southern Caspian Sea , 37°36’ N 49°29’ E, K. Abbasi & M. Tavakoli, 06 Jan. 2004 GoogleMaps . ZSM 47599, female, 30.8+7.0 mm, Iran, Gilan Province, Anzali, southern Caspian Sea , 37°36’ N 49°29’ E, K. Abbasi & M. Tavakoli, 05 Jan. 2004 ( Fig. 4c View FIGURE 4 ) GoogleMaps . ZSM 47598, juvenile female, 27.5+ 6.4 mm, Iran, Gilan Province, Anzali, southern Caspian Sea , 37°36’ N 49°29’ E, K. Abbasi & S. Abdolmaleki, 01 Nov. 2002 GoogleMaps .
ZM-CBSU 5003-128, female, 30.9+ 8.2 mm, Iran, Gilan Province, Anzali, southern Caspian Sea , 37°36’ N 49°29’ E, K. Abbasi & S. Abdolmaleki, 09 Jan. 2004 GoogleMaps . ZM-CBSU 5001-1, female, 35.1+8.1, Iran, Gilan Province, Anzali, southern Caspian Sea , 37°29’ N 49°29’ E, K. Abbasi & S. Abdolmaleki, Nov. 2002 GoogleMaps . ZM-CBSU 5003-60, juvenile female, 25.4+ 6.1 mm, Iran, Gilan Province, Anzali, southern Caspian Sea , 37°31’ N 49°30’ E, K. Abbasi & S. Abdolmaleki, Nov. 2002 GoogleMaps . ZM-CBSU 5022-23, female, 26.0+5.9, Iran, Gilan Province, Chaboksar, southern Caspian Sea , 37°01’ N 50°34’ E, K. Abbasi & S. Abdolmaleki, 18 Nov. 2015 GoogleMaps . ZM-CBSU 5024-1, female, 23.7+ 5.3 mm, Iran, Gilan Province, Chamkhaleh, southern Caspian Sea , 37°30’ N 49°55’ E, K. Abbasi & S. Abdolmaleki, 09 Nov. 2002 GoogleMaps . ZM-CBSU 5003-77, female, 25.1+ 6.3 mm, Iran, Gilan Province, Anzali, southern Caspian Sea , 37°29’ N 49°29’ E, K. Abbasi & S. Abdolmaleki, 01 Nov. 2002 GoogleMaps .
PMR VP4679 View Materials male, 43.3+10.0 mm, Iran, Gilan Province, Chaboksar, southern Caspian Sea , 37°01’ N 50°34’ E, K. Abbasi & A. Sarapnah, 01 Mar. 2005 GoogleMaps . PMR VP4680 View Materials , male, 47.0+ 8.6 mm, Iran, Gilan Province, Anzali, southern Caspian Sea , 37°31’ N 49°30’ E, K. Abbasi & S. Abdolmaleki, 09 Mar. 2003 GoogleMaps . PMR VP4681 View Materials male, 35.1+ 8.5 mm, Iran, Gilan Province, Anzali, southern Caspian Sea , 37°29’ N 49°29’ E, K. Abbasi & S. Abdolmaleki, 01 Mar. 2003 GoogleMaps . PMR VP4682 View Materials , female, 30.4+ 7.4 mm, Iran, Gilan Province, Anzali, southern Caspian Sea , 37°29’ N 49°29’ E, K. Abbasi & S. Abdolmaleki, 17 Sep. 2002 GoogleMaps . PMR VP4683 View Materials , female, 34.2 mm, caudal fin damaged, Iran, Gilan Province, Anzali, southern Caspian Sea , 37°35’ N 49°29’ E, K. Abbasi & A. Sarapnah, 01 Jan. 2004 GoogleMaps .
Additional material. ZM-CBSU S003-17, 21 specimens, 31.7–47.3 mm SL, 37°37’46.71” N 49°33’55.10” E, K. Abbasi & S. Abdolmaleki, 09 Mar. 2003. ZM-CBSU S003-112–113, ZM-CBSU S003-115, GoogleMaps 3 specimens, 38.2–40.1 mm SL, 37°37’46.71” N 49°33’55.10” E, K. Abbasi & S. Abdolmaleki, 05 Jan. 2004. ZM-CBSU S003- 134–135, GoogleMaps 2 specimens, 33.5–40.8 mm SL, 37°37’46.71” N 49°33’55.10” E, K. Abbasi & S. Abdolmaleki, 10 Jan. 2004. All additional material was collected from Iran, Gilan Province, Anzali, southern Caspian Sea GoogleMaps .
Diagnosis. Benthophilus persicus is distinguished from all other congeneric species by: (1) dermal fold behind jaws well-developed, large, rectangular, (2) chin barbel of moderate size, 1/3–2/3 of eye diameter, (3) maximum body width 15.1–22.9% of SL, (4) mouth width 36.3–55.8% of head length, (5) second dorsal fin I+7–8; (6) origin of anal fin in front of vertical through origin of second dorsal fin, (7) dermal tubercles present, clearly larger than granules, with two posterior rows of spinules forming an acute, always less than right angle, (8) dorsal row of tubercles complete, 22– 29, (9) ventral row of tubercles 22–25, (10) ventrolateral row of tubercles absent, (11) tubercles not present on temporal and occipital head regions, (12) granules not present on flanks, (13) transversal suborbital row 6i below posterior end of row b, (14) anterior interorbital transversal row pa with one or two papillae and anterior interorbital transversal row pp with two or three papillae, and (15) body with 20–22 transversal ltm rows starting anteriorly behind pectoral axilla and alternating anteriorly with three longitudinal llm rows (characters presented in the order of appearance in the description). Each of the selected diagnostic characters differentiate the new species from between 4 to 15 Benthophilus species. Considering only these selected fifteen diagnostic characters, the new species differs from congeneric species in a range from at least five characters (from B. durrelli Boldyrev & Bogutskaya, 2004 , B. mahmudbejovi Ragimov, 1976 and B. pinchuki Ragimov, 1982 ) up to eleven differential characters (from B. kessleri Berg, 1927 ).
Description ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 ). All morphometric and meristic values in the text are presented first for the holotype for the paratypes in parentheses. Morphometric data are provided in Table 1 View TABLE 1 . Particularly large variability of some features may be based on sex, developmental stage or size dimorphism and is highlighted in the Table 1 View TABLE 1 and further explained in the Discussion.
General morphology. Head rounded in vertical view, i.e., triangular with well-rounded lateral sides ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 ). Head large, long and wide, length 2.8 (2.6–3.0) in SL, width 1.0 (1.0–1.2) in head length. Head depressed (dorsoventrally compressed), head depth in head width 1.9 (1.7–2.2), head depth 1.8 (1.6–2.4) in head length, wider than body, head width 0.7 (0.5–0.6) in maximum body width. Snout gently rounded, broad and moderately long, larger than eye diameter, 0.5 (0.6–0.8) in eye diameter, 3.6 (3.6–4.2) in head length. Eye small, horizontal diameter 7.1 (4.6–7.1) in head length. Interorbital distance 6.8 (5.2–10.9) in head length. Eye diameter and interorbital width both size-dependent, i.e., eye diameter negatively correlated and interorbital distance positively correlated with the body size. Dermal fold behind end of jaws well-developed, large, rectangular, elongate ( Figs. 6a and 6b View FIGURE 6 ). Dermal fold depth in length 2.4 (2.5–3.7), with more or less rounded angles, along edge undulate or straight. Dermal fold of variable size to eye diameter, length of its base 0.9 (0.8–1.6) in eye diameter, 6.0 (4.9–8.2) in head length. Chin barbel of moderate size, 0.6 (0.4–0.7) in eye diameter, 12.0 (10.4–13.7) in head length, triangular, widened at base, triangle narrower in larger specimens, broader in smaller fish ( Figs. 6b and 6c View FIGURE 6 ). Mouth relatively wide, mouth width 2.0 (1.8–2.8) in head length. Mouth corner below anterior eye margin. Anterior nostril tube without process from rim, reaching upper lip; posterior nostril with raised rim. No medial groove present on temporal and occipital head regions. Body deepest at first dorsal-fin origin or slightly in front of it, depth decreasing towards caudal-fin base. Greatest body width at middle between pectoral-fin bases, 4.4 (4.4–6.6) in SL, strongly decreasing towards caudalfin base. Caudal peduncle laterally compressed, caudal peduncle width 1.3 (1.2–1.5 in depth), shallow, its depth 17.4 (15.0–19.3) in SL, and narrow, its width 22.2 (20.2–25.9) in SL. Maximum size 55.6 mm in total length.
Fins. The poor condition of fins in some cases prevents exact counts. D1 IV (III: 1, IV: 14), D2 I+7 (I+7: 7, I+8: 7; in paratype ZM-CBSU 5001-1 positive count was not possible), A I+8 (I+7: 6, I+8: 8; in paratype ZM-CBSU 5001-1 positive count was not possible), C branched rays 10 (10: 7, 11: 3, 12: 2; in three paratypes count was not possible), segmented 13 (13: 12; in three paratypes count was not possible), P 16 on both sides (16: 20, 17: 9, both sides counted; in paratype PMR VP4681 positive count was not possible on left side), V I+5/5+I (V I+5/5+I: 15). First dorsal fin low, its height 11.7 (10.5–11.9 in adult males, 13.5–21.3 in other individuals) in SL, lower than second dorsal fin, 7.8 (6.5–8.8) in SL. Origin of anal fin in front of vertical through origin of second dorsal fin. Anal-fin height 9.7 (8.4–10.4) in SL. Pectoral fin long, reaching backwards halfway between the first and second dorsal fins when folded back. Pelvic disc complete and oval with well-developed anterior membrane, anterior membrane with straight edge. Pelvic disc long, 3.2 (3.1–3.8) in SL, reaching to anal-fin origin. Caudal fin rounded.
Dermal ossifications. Granules present only on head (on snout, between eyes, on temporal and occipital head regions, and around eye in a circle), on predorsal area and between dorsal and dorsolateral rows of tubercles below the first dorsal fin and below interdorsal space ( Figs. 3 View FIGURE 3 and 5 View FIGURE 5 ). No granules on eyes. No granules on gill covers, dorsal body and posterior flank, around pelvic disc, and only a few granules on posterior dorsal part of caudal peduncle ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 ). Granules tiny, simple-structured bumps, sometimes grouped two or three together, small specimens with comparatively large granules ( Figs. 2 View FIGURE 2 and 3 View FIGURE 3 ). Tubercles distinctively larger than granules ( Figs. 2 View FIGURE 2 and 3 View FIGURE 3 ). Tubercles on head appear more or less randomly scattered. Head with a few small tubercles on snout, 2–4 tubercles present between eyes and 10–12 well-developed tubercles on upper cheek, preopercle and opercle ( Figs. 5 View FIGURE 5 and 7a View FIGURE 7 ). Tubercles not present on temporal and occipital head regions, i.e. all dermal ossifications are definable as granules according to size and shape; and the first tubercles anteriorly to temporal region are located at interorbital space, i.e. anteriorly to rear edge of eyes ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 ). Tubercles on trunk are arranged in longitudinal rows: dorsal, dorsolateral and ventral rows ( Figs. 7 View FIGURE 7 b-d). Dorsal row complete, with 22–29 tubercles, including 2–4 tubercles in front of the first dorsal fin. Several anterior tubercles of dorsal row in front and along the first dorsal fin smaller than remaining tubercles and with one radial row of spinules instead of two. Dorsolateral row with 20–26 well developed tubercles, starting above pectoral-fin base, ending at posterior part or end of D2, decreasing in size posteriorly. No ventrolateral row ( Fig. 7c View FIGURE 7 ). Ventral row anteriorly curved upwards with 2–3 tubercles above others, 22–25 tubercles including the 2–3 anterior upper tubercles. Tubercle bodies poorly defined, dominated by spinules. Tubercles of body rows and of head possess two posterior rows of spinules forming an acute angle, always less than right angle. Exceptions are the anterior tubercles of dorsal row, with one radial row of spinules instead of two ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 ), and tubercles on preopercle and opercle, where spinules look disorganised ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 ).
Lateral line system ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 ). No head canals present. Number of papillae in rows are strongly specimen size depending, with larger rows of sensory papillae irregularly doubled or tripled in larger specimens (e.g., suborbital transversal rows or row ot) ( Figs. 2 View FIGURE 2 and 6a View FIGURE 6 ). Some rows or parts of rows as ridges with papillae along top, e.g., row e ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 ). Rows with range of number of sensory papillae in parentheses as follows: (1) preorbital: snout with four median preorbital series, vertical row r (3–5) slightly above horizontal level of posterior nares, horizontal row s 1 (3–5) below horizontal level of posterior nares, horizontal row s 2 (3–4) n the level of anterior nares and below s 1 and vertical s 3 (2–4) more medially above upper lip. Lateral series c in four parts: superior c 2 as two horizontal rows between anterior and posterior nostril (2+4 – 4+8); middle c 1 (3–6) starting at anterior nostril; inferior rows, upper horizontal c 2 (5–10) and lower horizontal c 1 (3–6) starting anteriorly at upper lip. (2) suborbital: seven transverse suborbital rows (1–7) of sensory papillae: rows 1–4 begin distant from orbit, row 4 from anterior end of row b downwards to posterior end of row d; superior segments rows 5s and 6s and row 7 close to eye, inferior sections of rows 5 and 6 well developed, row 5i below middle of row b, row 6i below posterior end of row b, both ending downwards below row d in the level and behind dermal fold (1: 10+23, 2: 8–15, 3: 8–21, 4: 8– 15, 5s: 4–8, 5i: 10– 16, 6s: 4–7, 6i: 12–19, 7: 1–2). Longitudinal row b (10–16) extending forwards above row 5i to upper end of row 4 not reaching below eye. Longitudinal row d (9+8 – 15+11) discontinuous with large gap between supralabial and cheek parts from suborbital row 2 to row 3. (3) preoperculo-mandibular: external row e (27+22 – 44+34) divided into anterior and posterior sections; internal row i continuous (40–62), mental row f (6–14) as cluster in front of chin barbel ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 ). (4) oculoscapular: vertical row tra (1–3) behind lower posterior eye edge with one additional papilla behind it, longitudinal row x¹ placed posteriorly above opercle (1+3 – 5+3), divided by vertical row trp (3–5) in two parts, vertical row q (2–5) behind and below row x¹, with one or two additional papillae behind it. Longitudinal row x² (2–3) placed above opercular posterior edge, with transversal row y (2–3) below it. Axillary vertical rows as 1 (3–7), as 2 (4–7), as 3 (6–12) present, row la 1 (2–4) above as 2, row la 2 (3–5) above between as 2 and as 3. (5) opercular: transverse row ot (23–48); superior longitudinal row os (10–24); and interior longitudinal row oi (3–5). (6) anterior dorsal: anterior row n longitudinal (1–3) behind upper eye, transverse row o (1–4) distant from fellow in dorsal midline; longitudinal row g (3–4) distant behind row o, longitudinal row m and longitudinal row h not visible. (7) interorbital: two pairs of interorbital transversal rows, anterior pa (1–2) and posterior pp (2–3). Body with 18–22 transversal ltm rows starting anteriorly behind axilla and as rows, alternating anteriorly with three longitudinal llm rows making anterior beginning pattern of -II-I-I ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 ). Three transversal lv rows at lower anterior body. Two longitudinal lc rows, one along midline of caudal fin, the second above it.
Osteology. Vertebral column: 9 (8–10) precaudal and 19 (19–20) caudal vertebrae (including urostyle); total vertebral count: 28 (28–30). D1 pterygiophore insertion pattern: 3–22 1*01*1*1* (only from holotype); number of anal pterygiophores anterior to the first haemal spine 0 (0–1). Crest-like remaxillary process present on posterior third of premaxialla, sloping with a steep angle on anterior rim and gently towards posterior tip of premaxialla. Five branchiostegal rays. One epural. Number of C rays inserting in hypural 5: 2 (1–2), 3+4 (fused): 5 (5–6), hypural 1+2 (fused): 4 (4–5) and parhypural: 1 (0–1), total number of C rays inserting in hypurals, and parhypural: 12 (12; fused hypural 1+2 and 3+4 separated by a large gap, which does not support any branched caudal ray.
Coloration. No live coloration recorded. Color of preserved specimens ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 ): body opaque fawn, irregularly scattered melanophores present on upper head and body, and also on dorsal, caudal and pectoral fins. In some specimens remaining pigmentation almost invisible. Some specimens with three whitish saddles on back: at D2 anterior beginning, D2 posterior end and on caudal peduncle, and with four pigmented blotches on caudal fin longitudinally arranged.
Etymology. The species is named for Persia.
Distribution and habitat. Southern Caspian Sea basin ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ). Benthophilus persicus inhabits brackish waters and is abundant on sandy bottoms in coastal areas of the southern Caspian Sea. Capture depth ranges from 6 to 70 m. However, no specimens have yet been collected in the eastern part of southern Caspian Sea.
Remarks. Boldyrev & Bogutskaya (2007) tentatively assigned 20 recognized species of the genus Benthophilus to four phenotypic groups. The most prominent differences of the new species as compared with members of the four different species groups are as follows. The new species clearly differs from group I members comprising B. granulosus Kessler, 1877 , B. grimmi Kessler, 1877 , B. kessleri Berg, 1927 , B. leptorhynchus Kessler, 1877 and B. svetovidovi Pinchuk & Ragimov, 1979 by having tubercles on the body (vs. bony plates rather than tubercles on body). Benthophilus persicus differs from B. baeri Kessler, 1877 and B. spinosus Kessler, 1877 of group IV by having comparatively small dorsal tubercles with body poorly defined, dominated by clearly visible spinules ( Figs. 2 View FIGURE 2 and 3 View FIGURE 3 ) (vs. very large dorsal tubercles with clear polygonal conical erected body with small or hardly visible spinules, Figure 4 View FIGURE 4 in Boldyrev & Bogutskaya (2007)), 22–25 tubercles in ventral row (vs. 9–20), numerous tiny simple structured granules, sometimes grouped two or three together (vs. large and sparse granules with spinules), a few granules present on the posterior dorsal part of the caudal peduncle (vs. granules restricted to the upper head surface, gill covers and anterior part of the back).
Benthophilus persicus cannot be unambiguously assigned to phenotypic groups II or III of Boldyrev & Bogutskaya (2007) since it features a mix of characters that were used to distinguish these two groups. The new species has tubercles with two posterior rows of spinules forming an acute angle (vs. almost right angle of two rows of spinules on dorsal tubercules in group III), tubercles present between eyes (vs. tubercles absent between eyes in group III), a complete dorsal row (vs. dorsal row incomplete in group III), and a low count of 22–29 dorsal row tubercles (vs. two out of four species of group III, B. pinchuki Ragimov, 1982 and B. ragimovi Boldyrev & Bogutskaya, 2004 , having higher counts of dorsal row tubercles). However, it has no tubercles on temporal and occipital head regions (vs. usually four tubercles in row on each side of head in temporal and occipital regions of head, one unpaired temporal tubercle in group II) and no blotches on body in a preserved state (vs. blotches on body in group II, except B. abdurahmanovi Ragimov, 1978 ). The phenotypic groups II and III of Boldyrev & Bogutskaya (2007) appear less well defined morphologically than the other two groups. Therefore, the new species is here compared with each of the 13 recognized species of groups II and III in alphabetic order:
Benthophilus persicus differs from B. abdurahmanovi Ragimov, 1978 by having origin of anal fin in front of vertical through origin of second dorsal fin (vs. under origin of the second dorsal fin), tubercles present, clearly larger than granules, with two posterior rows of spinules forming an acute angle (vs. tubercles slightly larger than granules, with weakly developed spinules), no ventrolateral row of tubercles (vs. present), no tubercles on temporal and occipital head regions (vs. weak tubercles present there), no granules on flanks (vs. present), transversal suborbital row 6i below posterior end of row b (vs. below middle of row b), and the anterior interorbital transversal row pa with 1–2 papilla (vs. 3–5 papillae).
Benthophilus persicus differs from B. casachicus Ragimov, 1978 by having the dermal fold rectangular large (vs. triangular large), the origin of anal fin in front of vertical through origin of second dorsal fin (vs. under origin of the second dorsal fin), tubercles present with two posterior rows of spinules forming an acute angle (vs. tubercles with numerous radial rows of spinules), no tubercles on temporal and occipital head regions (vs. weak tubercles present on head), anterior interorbital transversal row pa with 1–2 papillae (vs. 3–5 papillae), body with 18–22 transversal ltm rows starting anteriorly behind axilla and alternating anteriorly with three longitudinal llm rows, having a total of 21–25 lm rows (vs. 17–18 lm rows in total), and a maximum body width 15.1–22.9% of SL (vs. 23.2–27.8%).
Benthophilus persicus is different from B. ctenolepidus Kessler, 1877 in having the dermal fold rectangular large (vs. curved large), origin of anal fin in front of vertical through origin of second dorsal fin (vs. under origin of the second dorsal fin), tubercles present with two posterior rows of spinules forming an acute, always less than right, angle (vs. about right angle), dorsal row of tubercles complete, 22–29 (vs. incomplete dorsal row), transversal suborbital row 6i below posterior end of row b (vs. below middle of row b), and second dorsal fin with I+7–8 rays (vs. second dorsal fin I+9–10).
Benthophilus persicus differs from B. durrelli by being distributed in southern Caspian Sea (vs. distribution in the Taganrog Bay of the Sea of Azov and Don River from mouth upstream to the upper stretch of Tsymlyansk Reservoir) and by having no ventrolateral row of tubercles (vs. large tubercles present), no tubercles on temporal and occipital head regions (vs. present in two radial rows), no granules on flanks (vs. sparsely scattered but present), transversal suborbital row 6i below posterior end of row b (vs. below middle of row b), and the anterior interorbital transversal row pa with 1–2 papillae (vs. 3–5 papillae).
Benthophilus persicus differs from B. leobergius Berg, 1949 in having the dermal fold rectangular (vs. triangular), origin of anal fin in front of vertical through origin of second dorsal fin (vs. origin of anal fin under origin of the second dorsal fin), no tubercles on temporal and occipital head regions (vs. tubercles present), transversal suborbital row 6i below posterior end of row b (vs. below middle of row b), anterior interorbital transversal row pa with 1–2 papilla (vs. 3–5 papillae), maximum body width 15.1–22.9% of SL (vs. 24.5–31.1%), and mouth width 36.3–55.8% of head length (vs. 65.3–71.3%).
Benthophilus persicus differs from B. leptocephalus Kessler, 1877 in having the dermal fold large and rectangular (vs. dermal fold absent), a moderate chin barbel, 1/3–2/3 of eye diameter in length (vs. very small barbel, hardly visible or absent), tubercles present with two posterior rows of spinules forming an acute, always less than right, angle (vs. nearly right angle), a complete dorsal row of tubercles, 22–29 (vs. incomplete dorsal row), anterior interorbital transversal row pp with 2–3 papillae (vs. single papilla), and second dorsal fin with I+7–8 rays (vs. second dorsal fin rays I+9–11).
Benthophilus persicus differs from B. macrocephalus (Pallas, 1787) in having a moderate chin barbel, 1/3–2/3 of eye diameter (vs. large barbel, about equal eye diameter), the origin of anal fin in front of vertical through origin of second dorsal fin (vs. under origin of the second dorsal fin), no tubercles on temporal and occipital head regions (vs. tubercles present), no granules on flanks (vs. thorn like granules on flanks), transversal suborbital row 6i below posterior end of row b (vs. below middle of row b), anterior interorbital transversal row pa with 1–2 papillae (vs. 3–6 papillae), and mouth width 36.3–55.8% of head length (vs. 56.2–67.8%).
Benthophilus persicus is distinguished from B. magistri Iljin, 1927 by its distribution in southern Caspian Sea (vs. distribution in the eastern part of the Sea of Azov) and by having the origin of the anal fin in front of vertical through origin of second dorsal fin (vs. origin of anal fin under origin of the second dorsal fin), no ventrolateral row of tubercles (vs. large tubercles present), no tubercles on temporal and occipital head regions (vs. very small tubercles present), no granules on flanks (vs. granules present), transversal suborbital row 6i below posterior end of row b (vs. below middle of row b), and the anterior interorbital transversal row pa with 1–2 papillae (vs. 3–5 papillae).
Benthophilus persicus differs from B. mahmudbejovi by lacking a ventrolateral row of tubercles (vs. present with large tubercles), no tubercles on temporal and occipital head regions (vs. tubercles present), granules not present on flanks (vs. granules present), transversal suborbital row 6i below posterior end of row b (vs. below middle of row b), and the anterior interorbital transversal row pa with 1–2 papillae (vs. 3–5 papillae).
Benthophilus persicus differs from B. nudus Berg, 1998 by its distribution in southern Caspian Sea (vs. distribution in the lagoons, lakes and rivers of the north-western Black Sea) and by having the dermal fold rectangular and large (vs. dermal fold roughly triangular, large), origin of anal fin in front of vertical through origin of second dorsal fin (vs. behind vertical through the origin of the second dorsal fin), no ventrolateral row of tubercles (vs. present with large tubercles), no tubercles on temporal and occipital head regions (vs. tubercles present), no granules on flanks (vs. granules present), and transversal suborbital row 6i below posterior end of row b (vs. below middle of row b), anterior interorbital transversal row pa with 1–2 papillae (vs. 3–5 papillae).
Benthophilus persicus differs from B. pinchuki in having the dermal fold well developed, rectangular (vs. dermal fold triangular, small), origin of anal fin in front of vertical through origin of second dorsal fin (vs. origin of anal fin under origin of the second dorsal fin), tubercles present with two posterior rows of spinules forming an acute, always less than right, angle (vs. nearly right angle), dorsal row of tubercles complete, 22–29 (vs. dorsal row complete, 31–33 tubercles), and a second dorsal fin with I+7–8 rays (vs. second dorsal fin rays I+9–10).
Benthophilus persicus differs from B. ragimovi in having the dermal fold rectangular, large (vs. triangular, small), the origin of anal fin in front of vertical through origin of second dorsal fin (vs. under origin of the second dorsal fin), tubercles present with two posterior rows of spinules forming an acute, always less than right angle (vs. nearly right angle), dorsal row of tubercles 22–29 (vs. 30–33), no ventrolateral row of tubercles (vs. present, large), and the second dorsal fin with I+7–8 (vs. I+9–10).
Benthophilus persicus is distinguished from B. stellatus (Sauvage, 1874) by its distribution in the southern Caspian Sea (vs. distribution in the Taganrog Bay of the Sea of Azov and Don river from mouth upstream to the upper stretch of Tsymlyansk reservoir) and by having the dermal fold rectangular (vs. dermal fold roughly triangular), a moderate chin barbel, 1/3–2/3 of eye diameter in length (vs. large, about equal eye diameter), the origin of anal fin in front of vertical through origin of second dorsal fin (vs. under origin of the second dorsal fin), no tubercles on temporal and occipital head regions (vs. tubercles present), transversal suborbital row 6i below posterior end of row b (vs. below middle of row b), anterior interorbital transversal row pa with 1–2 papillae (vs. 3–5 papillae), maximum body width 15.1–22.9% of SL (vs. 22.8–28.3%), and a mouth width 36.3–55.8% of head length (vs. 55.8–62.2%).
TABLE 1. Benthophilus persicus sp. nov. Morphometric characters as % of standard length or as % of head length. Characters are sorted as in Boldyrev & Bogutskaya (2007) with the new introduced characters added at the end in alphabetic order. The morphometric character and the related values of dimorphic characters with non-overlapping ranges of groups marked with ^ for adult males vs. the immature male and all females, with * for all males and the large female vs. small mature and immature females, and with ˜ for adult males and the large female vs. smaller females and the immature male, see Discussion.
| Specimen | ZSM 47595 holotype | ZSM 47596 paratype | ZSM 47597 paratype | ZSM 47599 paratype | ZSM 47598 paratype | ZM - CBSU 5003 - 128 paratype | ZM - CBSU 5001-1 paratype | ZM - CBSU 5003-60 paratype | ZM - CBSU 5022-23 paratype | ZM - CBSU 5024-1 paratype | ZM - CBSU 5003- 77 paratype | PMR VP4679 paratype | PMR VP4680 paratype | PMR VP4681 paratype | PMR VP4682 paratype | PMR VP4683 paratype |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | male | female | juvenile male | female | juvenile female | female | female | juvenile female | female | female | female | male | male | male | female | female |
| Standard length (SL) inmm | 45.2 | 45.8 | 30.4 | 30.8 | 27.5 | 30.9 | 35.1 | 25.4 | 26.0 | 23.7 | 25.1 | 43.3 | 47.0 | 35.1 | 30.4 | 34.2 |
| % ofSL | ||||||||||||||||
| Maximum body depth* | 22.2* | 19.8* | 21.0* | 14.6 | 14.6 | 17.6 | 16.7 | 16.9 | 15.6 | 17.0 | 16.5 | 19.7* | 20.7* | 22.8* | 16.6 | 14.6 |
| Maximum body width* | 22.6* | 22.9* | 20.9* | 16.7 | 16.0 | 15.1 | 18.0 | 18.5 | 17.6 | 17.5 | 18.9 | 19.2* | 20.0* | 21.9* | 18.4 | 17.2 |
| Depth of caudal peduncle | 5.8 | 6.3 | 6.7 | 5.7 | 5.4 | 5.3 | 6.0 | 5.9 | 5.5 | 5.6 | 5.5 | 6.5 | 6.3 | 5.4 | 5.7 | 5.2 |
| Width of caudal peduncle | 4.5 | 4.3 | 4.6 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 4.2 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 3.9 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 4.3 | 3.9 |
| First predorsal distance | 40.1 | 42.3 | 42.8 | 39.8 | 39.3 | 40.7 | 41.3 | 39.3 | 39.5 | 39.7 | 39.6 | 39.9 | 41.1 | 41.2 | 38.9 | 42.7 |
| Second predorsal distance | 67.1 | 68.0 | 61.7 | 63.2 | 62.1 | 63.0 | 65.1 | 62.1 | 62.0 | 60.4 | 61.9 | 66.6 | 65.0 | 66.2 | 63.3 | 64.3 |
| Caudal peduncle length | 18.0 | 17.9 | 19.9 | 20.5 | 19.5 | 19.4 | 20.3 | 20.0 | 19.1 | 18.2 | 20.7 | 18.1 | 20.3 | 19.2 | 19.0 | 19.6 |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |