Spinofenestella Termier & Termier, 1971
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5252/g2015n2a2 |
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BA9B2FF0-9D3B-44AF-894F-419DE5AE4C13 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038D87E1-F74F-FF8C-A1D3-FD65E6D6FEC8 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Spinofenestella Termier & Termier, 1971 |
status |
|
Genus Spinofenestella Termier & Termier, 1971 View in CoL
Alternifenestella Termier & Termier, 1971: 42 View in CoL .
TYPE SPECIES. — Fenestella spinosa Condra, 1902 by original designation. Lower Permian (Wolfcampian) ; North America .
DIAGNOSIS. — Reticulate colonies with relatively wide and thick branches and relatively thin dissepiments. Autozooecia arranged in two rows on the branches. Autozooecia triangular in mid tangential section, triangular to pentagonal proximal to bifurcations. Narrow keel with single row of nodes developed.
OCCURRENCE. — Lower Devonian – Upper Permian.
COMPARISON
Spinofenestella Termier &Termier, 1971 View in CoL differs from the genus Rectifenestella Morozova, 1974 View in CoL by the triangular shape of the autozooecia in mid tangential section.
Spinofenestella major ( Nikiforova, 1933) View in CoL comb. nov. ( Fig. 21 View FIG E-I; Appendix)
Fenestella major Nikiforova, 1933: 16 . — Schulga-Nesterenko 1951: 93, 94, pl. 17, fig. 3, pl. 18, fig. 2.
Fenestella donaica – Nikiforova 1927: 250, pl. 12, figs 8, 9.
Fenestella donaica var. major Nikiforova, 1933: 16 , pl. 16, figs 4, 5. — Nekhoroshev 1948: 28, pl. 2, fig. 3, pl. 10, fig. 5.
Alternifenestella major View in CoL – Gorjunova 2013: 576, 577, pl. 5, fig. 2.
MATERIAL. — SMF 21.899.
OCCURRENCE. — Carboniferous, Mississippian (upper Visean); Roque Redonde (Montagne Noire, southern France). Carboniferous, Mississippian; Ukraine, Donetz Basin. Carboniferous, Mississippian (Serpukhovian); Russian Platform. Middle Carboniferous; Kazakhstan.
EXTERIOR DESCRIPTION
Reticulate colony formed by straight branches joined by narrow dissepiments. Fenestrules oval to rectangular, about twice as long as wide. Autozooecia arranged in two rows on branches. Autozooecial apertures circular, with low smooth peristome; 3 to 5 apertures spaced per fenestrule length. Median keel low, narrow, containing small elliptical nodes. Nodes 0.03-0.05 mm in diameter, spaced 0.14-0.18 mm from centre to centre.
INTERIOR DESCRIPTION
Autozooecia short, triangular to trapezoid in mid tangential section; with short to moderately long vestibule in longitudinal section. Axial wall between autozooecial rows strongly zigzag; aperture positioned at distal end of chamber. Superior hemisepta present, long, curved proximally; inferior hemisepta absent. External laminated skeleton well-developed on both obverse and reverse sides. Heterozooecia not observed.
COMPARISON
Spinofenestella major ( Nikiforova, 1933) View in CoL comb. nov. differs from Spinofenestella donaica ( Lebedev, 1924) View in CoL in longer fenestrules (0.77-1.02 mm vs 0.55-0.65 mm in S. donaica View in CoL ). Spinofenestella major View in CoL comb. nov. differs from S. donaiciformis (Schulga-Nesterenko, 1951) in smaller and more closely spaced nodes on the median keel (distance between node centres 0.14-0.18 mm vs 0.30-0.42 mm in S. donaiciformis ).
Spinofenestella cf. simplaris ( Trizna, 1961) View in CoL ( Figs 22H View FIG ; 23 View FIG A-C; Appendix)
Fenestella simplaris Trizna, 1961: 75 , 76, pl. 8, figs 3, 4, text-fig. 27.
MATERIAL. — SMF 21.906- SMF 21.910.
OCCURRENCE. — Carboniferous, Mississippian (upper Visean); Roque Redonde (Montagne Noire, southern France).
EXTERIOR DESCRIPTION
Reticulate colony formed by straight branches joined by wide dissepiments. Fenestrules oval to rectangular, long, narrow. Autozooecia arranged in two rows on branches. Autozooecial apertures circular, with low smooth peristome; 3 to 4 apertures spaced per fenestrule length. Large elliptical nodes on the low keel, widely and irregularly spaced.
INTERIOR DESCRIPTION
Autozooecia short, triangular to trapezoid in mid tangential section; with short to moderately long vestibule in longitudinal section. Axial wall between autozooecial rows strongly zigzag; aperture positioned at distal end of chamber. Superior hemisepta weakly developed; inferior hemisepta absent. External laminated skeleton well-developed on both obverse and reverse sides. Heterozooecia not observed.
COMPARISON
The present material is similar to Spinofenestella simplaris ( Trizna, 1961) from the Mississippian of Urals. However, the present material has significantly longer fenestrules (0.83-1.02 mm vs 0.55-0.75 mm in S. simplaris ). The present material differs from Spinofenestella plebeia ( M’Coy, 1844) from the Lower Carboniferous of Ireland, in wider branches (average branch width 0.38 mm vs 0.29 mm in S. plebeia ), and wider dissepiments (average dissepiment width 0.23 mm vs 0.17 mm in S. plebeia ). It differs from S. triangularis ( Nekhoroshev, 1953) from the Mississippian of Kazakhstan in wider branches (branch width 0.35-0.42 mm vs 0.15-0.20 mm in S. triangularis ).
SMF |
Forschungsinstitut und Natur-Museum Senckenberg |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Spinofenestella Termier & Termier, 1971
Ernst, Andrej, Wyse Jackson, Patrick N. & Aretz, Markus 2015 |
Alternifenestella major
GORJUNOVA R. V. 2013: 576 |
Alternifenestella
TERMIER H. & TERMIER G. 1971: 42 |
Fenestella simplaris
TRIZNA V. B. 1961: 75 |
Fenestella major
NIKIFOROVA A. I. 1933: 16 |
Fenestella donaica var. major
NEKHOROSHEV V. P. 1948: 28 |
NIKIFOROVA A. I. 1933: 16 |
Fenestella donaica
NIKIFOROVA A. I. 1927: 250 |