Calotes Cuvier, 1817

Pal, Saunak, Vijayakumar, S. P., Shanker, Kartik, Jayarajan, Aditi & Deepak, V., 2018, A systematic revision of Calotes Cuvier, 1817 (Squamata: Agamidae) from the Western Ghats adds two genera and reveals two new species, Zootaxa 4482 (3), pp. 401-450 : 414-418

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4482.3.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:10258391-162F-4C7D-AA5E-1A03A4F3FE19

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5996672

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038E021D-FFBD-FFB7-4FA9-FEF3FB90FD88

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Calotes Cuvier, 1817
status

 

Calotes Cuvier, 1817

The genus Calotes Cuvier, 1817 with the type species Lacerta calotes Linnaeus, 1758 belongs to the subfamily Draconinae of the family Agamidae , containing 26 species. The geographical distribution of this genus is largely restricted to South Asia and Indo-china, except for one isolated species Calotes nigriplicatus Hallermann, 2000 found in Ambon Island in Indonesia. The greatest diversity of the genus is in the Western Ghats and Sri Lanka. Four species of Calotes ( C. grandisquamis , C. nemoricola , Calotes cf. versicolor , Calotes calotes ) are known from the Western Ghats of which two are endemic to this region.

Diagnosis. Medium to large sized agamids with a relatively broader head; dorsal and lateral scales uniform, arranged in rows of backwardly pointed scales; dorsal and nuchal crest more or less developed; groups or rows of spines from eye to above tympanum; often an antehumeral skin fold or pit present covered with small scales; gular sac usually present; tympanum naked; tail long and slender, usually swollen and rounded at the base in males; no preanal or femoral pores.

Distribution. Lizards belonging to the Genus Calotes are widely distributed across Iran, Afghanistan, Bhutan, Bangladesh, Maldives, Nepal, India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka as well as southern China; parts of Myanmar, Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam, Peninsular Malaysia and parts of Indonesia. Moreover, Calotes versicolor has been introduced into Kenya, Borneo, Sulawesi, Seychelles, Mauritius, Oman and Florida ( USA) (Das et al. 2008; Manthey, 2008; Uetz and Hošek, 2016).

Taxonomic groups. Smith (1935) separated members of the genus Calotes into four distinct groups, I. C. cristatella group, II. C. microlepis group, III. C. versicolor group, and IV. C. liocephalus group, each composed of multiple species and another group composed of two dwarf species based on their morphological similarities. Later, Moody (1980) separated the genus into four different genera, namely Bronchocela Kaup, 1827 (group I of Smith), Dendragama Doria, 1888 , Pseudocalotes Fitzinger, 1843 (group II of Smith) and Calotes (group III, IV and the two dwarf species of Smith). Most of the Calotes species occurring in the Western Ghats belong to the Calotes versicolor group of Smith (1935) except Calotes rouxii and Calotes ellioti , which belong to the dwarf group. Here, we transfer these two species to the new genus Monilesaurus gen. nov. In the present study, we follow Smith’s species groups for taxonomic accounts and morphological comparisons. Since Smith, there have been various new additions to the genus Calotes and to the Calotes versicolor group. In this study, we compare each individual species only with members of their own group.

Calotes versicolor group. Members of the C. versicolor group are characterized by a medium to large adult body size; body more or less compressed, dorsal and lateral scales large, uniform, smooth or feebly keeled and oriented postero-dorsally; antehumeral fold absent; dorsal scales larger than the ventrals except in C. calotes where it is equal to or slightly smaller than the ventrals; nuchal and dorsal crest well developed, continuous, at least till behind the shoulders; postorbital spine absent except in C. emma Gray, 1845 ; supratympanic spines in form of paired patches or as a single longitudinal series of spines ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 & 5 View FIGURE 5 ). For taxonomic comparisons, we add the recently designated C. minor to Smith’s C. versicolor group (See Deepak et al. 2015).

Content. Calotes bachae Hartmann, Geissler, Poyarkov, Ihlow, Galoyan, Rödder & Böhme, 2013 ; C. bhutanensis Biswas, 1975 ; C. calotes ; C. ceylonensis Müller, 1887 ; C. chincollium Vindum, 2003 ; C. desilvai Bahir & Maduwage, 2005 ; C. emma ; C. grandisquamis , C. hutunwini Zug & Vindum, 2006 ; C. irawadi Zug, Grown, Schulte & Vindum, 2006 ; C. jerdoni Günther, 1870 ; C. liocephalus Günther, 1872 ; C. liolepis Boulenger, 1885 ; C. versicolor , C. manamendrai Amarasinghe & Karunarathna, 2014 ; C. maria Gray, 1845 ; C. medgoensis Zhao & Li, 1984 ; C. minor , C. mystaceus Duméril & Bibron, 1837 ; C. nemoricola , C. nigrilabris Peters, 1860 ; C. nigriplicatus Hallermann, 2000 and C. pethiyagodai Amarasinghe, Karunarathna, Hallermann, Fujinuma, Grillitsch & Campbell, 2014 .

Diagnosis. All the species belonging to this group can be differentiated from the other groups of Calotes based on the combination of the following characters: From members of the genus Monilesaurus gen.nov., they can be easily distinguished morphologically based on a larger adult size (vs. smaller); dorsal and lateral scales rows directed posterodorsally, much larger in size (vs. posteroventrally, smaller in size); dorsal and lateral scales larger than ventrals, except in C. calotes (vs. not larger than ventrals) ( Fig. 4–5 View FIGURE 4 View FIGURE 5 vs 6–7) and absence of antehumeral fold (vs. presence of a well developed antehumeral fold) ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 ). From members of the genus Psammophilus , group they can be distinguished by the presence of compressed body shape (vs. depressed) ( Fig. 4–5 View FIGURE 4 View FIGURE 5 vs 8a); absence of an antehumeral fold (vs. antehumeral fold present) ( Fig. 10f View FIGURE 10 vs 10g); lateral scales much larger (vs. smaller); presence of well developed nuchal crest (vs. reduced) and lesser number of midbody scale rows, less than 60 (vs. scale rows higher in number, more than 80). From Microauris gen. nov. by having a relatively large tympanum ( Fig. 9a View FIGURE 9 vs 9b); scales on head large uniform shield like (vs. small, sub-triangular) ( Fig. 10b View FIGURE 10 vs 10d).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Chordata

Class

Reptilia

Order

Squamata

Family

Agamidae

Loc

Calotes Cuvier, 1817

Pal, Saunak, Vijayakumar, S. P., Shanker, Kartik, Jayarajan, Aditi & Deepak, V. 2018
2018
Loc

Monilesaurus acanthocephalus

Pal & Vijayakumar & Shanker & Jayarajan & Deepak 2018
2018
Loc

Monilesaurus montanus

Pal & Vijayakumar & Shanker & Jayarajan & Deepak 2018
2018
Loc

C. manamendrai

Amarasinghe & Karunarathna 2014
2014
Loc

C. pethiyagodai

Amarasinghe, Karunarathna, Hallermann, Fujinuma, Grillitsch & Campbell 2014
2014
Loc

Calotes bachae Hartmann, Geissler, Poyarkov, Ihlow, Galoyan, Rödder & Böhme, 2013

Hartmann, Geissler, Poyarkov, Ihlow, Galoyan, Rodder & Bohme 2013
2013
Loc

C. hutunwini

Zug & Vindum 2006
2006
Loc

C. irawadi

Zug, Grown, Schulte & Vindum 2006
2006
Loc

C. desilvai

Bahir & Maduwage 2005
2005
Loc

C. chincollium

Vindum 2003
2003
Loc

C. nigriplicatus

Hallermann 2000
2000
Loc

C. medgoensis

Zhao & Li 1984
1984
Loc

C. bhutanensis

Biswas 1975
1975
Loc

C. ceylonensis Müller, 1887

Muller 1887
1887
Loc

C. liolepis

Boulenger 1885
1885
Loc

C. grandisquamis

Gunther 1875
1875
Loc

C. liocephalus Günther, 1872

Gunther 1872
1872
Loc

C. jerdoni Günther, 1870

Gunther 1870
1870
Loc

C. nigrilabris

Peters 1860
1860
Loc

C. nemoricola

, Jerdon 1853
1853
Loc

C. emma

Gray 1845
1845
Loc

C. emma

Gray 1845
1845
Loc

C. maria

Gray 1845
1845
Loc

C. mystaceus Duméril & Bibron, 1837

Dumeril & Bibron 1837
1837
Loc

Calotes versicolor

Daudin 1802
1802
Loc

C. versicolor

Daudin 1802
1802
Loc

C. versicolor

Daudin 1802
1802
Loc

C. versicolor

Daudin 1802
1802
Loc

C. calotes

calotes (Linnaeus 1758
1758
Loc

C. calotes

calotes (Linnaeus 1758
1758
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF