Opistoplatys flavolineatus, Ishikawa, Tadashi, Cai, Wanzhi & Tomokuni, Masaaki, 2015
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3936.2.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:157EDA4A-00A3-469F-8234-7E7175BF13E7 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6112382 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038E87FC-FFDB-136D-FF43-BE47FED5A75F |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Opistoplatys flavolineatus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Opistoplatys flavolineatus View in CoL sp. nov.
( Figs. 5 View FIGURES 3 – 5 , 10, 11 View FIGURES 6 – 11 , 18–20 View FIGURES 12 – 20 , 22 View FIGURES 21 – 22 , 25–28 View FIGURES 23 – 28 , 31, 32 View FIGURES 29 – 32 , 36–38)
Diagnosis. This species is recognized by the following combination of character states: body brownish, approximately 7.6 mm long; head a little more than twice as long as width across eyes and approximately 1.5 times longer than pronotum; anteoculus 1.8 times longer than postoculus in male; eye approximately 3 times wider than interocular space in dorsal view in male; anterior pronotal lobe 0.45 times as long as posterior lobe along midline; and posterior pronotal lobe with yellowish longitudinal stripe along meson.
Description. Male. Body ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 3 – 5 ) mostly brown. Antennae and femora yellowish brown. Rostrum, tibiae, and tarsi brownish yellow. Posterior pronotal lobe yellowish brown on disc and humeral angles, with yellowish longitudinal stripe along meson ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 3 – 5 ). Hemelytra dark brown to blackish, with extreme base, corial veins, and basal halves of veins on membranes brownish yellow. Abdomen yellowish brown to dark brown.
Head ( Figs. 10, 11 View FIGURES 6 – 11 ) a little more than twice as long as width across eyes, approximately 1.5 times longer than pronotum; anteoculus 1.8 times longer than postoculus, a little longer than width across antenniferous tubercles; postoculus 0.7 times as long as its maximum width. Eye ( Figs. 10, 11 View FIGURES 6 – 11 ) approximately 3 times wider than interocular space in dorsal view. Antennal segment I slender, 0.9 times as long as segment II ( Figs. 18, 19 View FIGURES 12 – 20 ), 1.8 times longer than anteoculus ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 3 – 5 ); flagellum ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 12 – 20 ) as long as segment I, slightly shorter than segment II. Rostral segment I 1.3 times longer than segment II ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 6 – 11 ).
Pronotum ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 6 – 11 ) approximately 0.7 times as long as humeral width; anterior lobe 0.45 times as long as posterior lobe along midline. Hemelytra ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 3 – 5 ) reaching or slightly exceeding apex of abdomen.
Abdomen 1.7 times longer than its maximum width, covered with suberect and decumbent setae, with posterior margin of segment VII slightly concave at middle ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 21 – 22 ). Pygophore ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 23 – 28 ) somewhat compressed dorsoventrally; posterior process ( Figs. 26–28 View FIGURES 23 – 28 ) various in thickness in lateral view, gently curved posteriorly at base, finely rugose ventrally, at blunt apex in lateral view. Parameres ( Figs. 31, 32 View FIGURES 29 – 32 ) evenly curved, weakly expanded inwardly at middle, at obtuse apex in dorsal view. Phallosoma of phallus (Figs. 36, 37) compressed dorsoventrally, sclerotized laterally, strongly extended laterad at base; struts (Fig. 38) fused in apical half, rounded apically in dorsal view.
Female. Unknown.
FIGURES 33–38. Phallus (33, 34, 36, 37) and struts (35, 38) of Opistoplatys minimus (33–35) and O. flavolineatus (36–38), lateral (33, 36) and ventral (34, 35, 37, 38) views. Abbreviation: st, struts. Scale bars: 0.2 mm (31, 32, 34, 35); 0.1 mm (33, 36).
Measurements [in mm, ♂ (n=27), holotype in parentheses]. Body length 6.92–8.20 (8.13). Head length 1.56–1.79 (1.77), width across eyes 0.72–0.84 (0.84). Lengths of antennal segments I and II 1.28–1.51 (1.50) and 1.36–1.61 (1.60), respectively. Lengths of rostral segments I and II 0.94–1.05 (1.05) and 0.78–0.84 (0.84), respectively. Pronotum length 0.98–1.19 (1.19), width across humeri 1.56–1.80 (1.77). Hemelytron length 4.85–5.70 (5.57). Lengths of femur and tibia of fore leg 1.67–1.98 (1.98) and 1.62–1.90 (1.90); of mid leg 1.61–1.92 (1.92) and 1.62–1.92 (1.92); of hind leg 2.22–2.57 (2.57) and 2.38–2.74 (2.74). Abdomen length 4.00–4.83(4.70), maximum width 2.41–2.92 (2.82).
Holotype. ♂ ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 3 – 5 ), “[ JAPAN] Aha, Kunigami-son, Okinawa-hontô Is., the Ryûkyûs, 21. IV. 2003, by box light trap, M. Kimura et al.” ( LETUA IC 2014-00042) ( TUA).
Paratypes (26 ♂). JAPAN [Okinawa Is.] Miyagi, Higashi-son: 6 ♂ (one shown in Figs. 25, 26 View FIGURES 23 – 28 , 31, 32 View FIGURES 29 – 32 , 36–38), 20.iv.2003, BLT, M. Kimura et al. ( LETUA IC 2014-00043–00048) ( TUA, CUA, NSMT), 1 ♂, 28.vi.2003, M. Kimura et al. ( LETUA IC 2014-00049) ( TUA). Takae, Higashi-son: 1 ♂, 17.iv.2003, BLT, M. Kimura et al. ( LETUA IC 2014-00050) ( TUA), 5 ♂ (one shown in Figs. 18–20 View FIGURES 12 – 20 ), 18.iv.2003, BLT, M. Kimura et al. ( LETUA IC 2014-00051–00055) ( TUA), 1 ♂, 4.vii.2003, BLT, M. Kimura ( LETUA IC 2014-00056) ( TUA). Aha, Kunigamison: 1 ♂ ( Figs. 10, 11 View FIGURES 6 – 11 ), 20.iv.2003, BLT, M. Kimura et al. ( LETUA IC 2014-00057) ( TUA), 6 ♂ (one shown in Figs. 22 View FIGURES 21 – 22 , 27 View FIGURES 23 – 28 ), same data as holotype ( LETUA IC 2014-00058–00063) ( TUA, CAU), 1 ♂, 2.vii.2003, BLT, M. Kimura ( LETUA IC 2014-00064) ( TUA), 1 ♂, 2.vii.2003, M. Kimura et al. ( LETUA IC 2014-00065) ( TUA), 1 ♂, 5.vii.2003, BLT, M. Kimura ( LETUA IC 2014-00066) ( TUA), 1 ♂, 15.vii.2003, M. Kimura et al. ( LETUA IC 2014-00067) ( TUA). Yona, Kunigami-son: 1 ♂, 2.vi.1966, S. Tachikawa ( LETUA IC 2014-00068) ( TUA).
Other specimens examined. JAPAN [Amami-Oshima Is.] Shinokawa, Setouchi-chô: 2 ♂ (one shown in Fig. 28 View FIGURES 23 – 28 ), 23.vi.1997, S. Yoshimichi ( TUA).
Distribution. Japan: Ryukyu Islands (Amami-Oshima Is., Okinawa Is.).
Etymology. From the Latin compound flavolineatus , referring to the yellowish longitudinal stripe on the posterior pronotal lobe; an adjective.
Remarks. The yellowish longitudinal stripe on the posterior pronotal lobe is sometimes indistinct or reduced to spot-like. In general appearance, this new species closely resembles O. minimus sp. nov. However, O. flavolineatus sp. nov. can be distinguished from O. minimus sp. nov. by its relatively large body length (approximately 7.6 mm vs. approximately 6.7 mm), antennal flagellum shorter than antennal segment II ( Figs. 19, 20 View FIGURES 12 – 20 ) [vs. longer than antennal segment II ( Figs. 13, 14 View FIGURES 12 – 20 )], yellowish longitudinal stripe along the meson of the posterior pronotal lobe ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 3 – 5 ) [vs. no such stripe ( Figs. 3, 4 View FIGURES 3 – 5 )], and parameres weakly expanded inwardly at the middle ( Fig. 32 View FIGURES 29 – 32 ) [vs. not expanded inwardly at the middle ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 29 – 32 )].
Almost all of the specimens examined in the present study were collected during April to July by using BLTs placed on trees in the forests of Okinawa Island. No additional information regarding the biology of this reduviid is available.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |