Penthimia montana Distant
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4369.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:006FB6AF-D47F-4DFF-96C3-78B270D0FEA4 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5688438 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038EA103-FFAE-FFF9-FF0A-FF1A061CF9F0 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Penthimia montana Distant |
status |
|
Penthimia montana Distant View in CoL
Figs 66 View FIGURES 60–70 , 134–138 View FIGURES 134–141 , 244–247 View FIGURES 235–245 View FIGURES 246–253 .
Penthimia montana Distant, 1918: 17 View in CoL .
Penthimia nilgiriensis Distant, 1918:16 View in CoL –17. S yn. nov.
Male: Crown orange-yellow variably marked with dark brown apically. Face black. Pronotum yellow variably tinged with green and usually with brown marking anteriorly. Scutellum orange-yellow with transverse suture and a spot on each side on disc dark brown sometimes markings coalescing, with variable dark brown basal triangles. Forewings brownish hyaline with dense orange-tessellate spots, sometimes with some darker brown marking distally. Body beneath black.
Female. Crown and pronotum yellow with variable orange markings. Scutellum orange-brown. Forewings brownish hyaline with dense yellow to orange-brown tessellate spots. Body beneath yellow to black.
Male genitalia. Valve with posterior margin broadly rounded. Subgenital plate with long fine setae. Connective with arms about as long as stem. Style linear with well developed preapical lobe, apical apophysis finger-like, curved laterally. Aedeagus with well developed dorsal apodeme and preatrium; shaft directed caudo-dorsally, then erect dorsally with serrated lateral margins, gradually tapering to apex, basal half smooth, distal half with large number of spicules, gonopore apical.
Length. Male 5.2–5.8mm. Female 5.8–6.4mm.
Type material examined. INDIA: Lectotype ♂ P. montana (here designated): ‘Type H.T’ ‘ Penthimia montana Dist. type [hw]’ ‘Lovedale, Nilgiri Hills, S. India, 7200ft [hw], T. V. Campbell’ ‘81 8‘, ‘L 5.15 81 8’ [handwritten under specimen card], ‘S. India, E. A. Butler 1915-60 ’. Lectotype ♀ P. nilgiriensis Distant (here designated): ‘Type H. T.’ ’Lovedale [hw], Nilgiri Hills, S. India, T. V. Campbell’, ‘45 6‘, ‘L 6.15, 45 6 ‘[handwritten under specimen card], ‘S. India, E. A. Butler, 1915-60 ’ ‘on Rhododendron [hw]’. Both BMNH with ‘L’ code numbers for Lovedale.
Other material examined. INDIA: 1♂, ‘ S. India, Lovedale, Nilgiri Hills, S. India , 7200ft [hw], T. V. Campbell’, ‘81 8‘ ‘L 6.15’ ‘ Penthimia montana Dist. [hw]’ ; 1♂, S. India, Nilgiri Hills, Lovedale, T. V. Campbell, ‘L 6.15’ ; 1♂, S. India, Madras, Coonoor, T. V. Campbell, ‘C. 5.15’ ; 1♀, ‘Lovedale [hw], Nilgiri Hills, S. India, 7200ft [hw]’ T. V. Campbell’, ‘85 6‘,‘L 5.15’ ‘ Brit. Mus. 1926-121’ ‘on Rhododendron [hw]’ ; 1♀, ‘ Lovedale, Nilgiri Hills, S. India, T. V. Campbell’ ‘85 6‘, ‘L. 5.15’ ; 7♀, S. India, Nilgiri Hills, Lovedale, T. V. Campbell’. All BMNH with ‘L’ and ‘C’ code numbers for Lovedale and Coonoor handwritten under specimen cards.
Remarks. Both this species and its synonym were described from an unknown number of specimens (syntype) with the following data: ‘Nilgiri Hills; Lovedale (T. V. Campbell)’. One specimen each of P. montana and P. nilgiriensis are considered syntypes as they have both BMNH registration labels dated before their publication date and original data labels. The remaining specimens listed under ‘Other material examined’ are topotypical but we cannot be sure of their status (see Material and Methods). This species and P. quadrinotata can be distinguished by their relatively pale dorsum (particularly females) but the former is larger and the genitalia is distinctly different. The aedeagal shaft of P. montana and P. fraterna is similar in having spicules and serrated lateral margins, however, they differ in the curvature of the shaft in lateral view and shape in caudal view (compare Figs. 118, 119 View FIGURES 113–119 with 137, 138). Although P. nilgiriensis was described first by Distant (1918) we prefer to use the name P. montana as its type is a male
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Penthimia montana Distant
Shobharani, M., Viraktamath, C. A. & Webb, M. D. 2018 |
Penthimia montana
Distant 1918: 17 |
Penthimia nilgiriensis
Distant 1918: 16 |