Mecidea major, Sailer, 1952
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4958.1.28 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:85CC570D-E988-49B6-99D8-F427443DEF15 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4946579 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038EEA3B-FF85-2B21-57D0-BC5CFB26FE2A |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Mecidea major |
status |
|
Key to Nymphal Instars of Mecidea major and M. minor 1
1 Tylus longer than juga; nota without distinct dorsal submedial and sublateral longitudinal stripes; posterior margin of mesonotum almost straight, weakly to not extended posteriorly ( Figs. 5 View FIGURES 5–7 and 12 View FIGURES 12–14 ); thoracic pleura brown, without stripes ( Figs. 19 View FIGURES 19–23 and 24 View FIGURES 24–28 ); length less than 1.20........................................................................... first instar2
- Tylus longer to shorter than juga; nota with distinct submedial and sublateral longitudinal stripes; posterior margin of mesonotum moderately to strongly extended posteriorly (e.g., Figs. 6–7 View FIGURES 5–7 , 13–14 View FIGURES 12–14 ); thoracic pleura usually with one to two longitudinal stripes, one dorsal, one ventral ( Figs. 20–23 View FIGURES 19–23 , 25–28 View FIGURES 24–28 ); length more than 1.70....................................... 2
2 Medial abdominal plates 1–3 with anterior margin heavily bordered with dark brown except medially ( Figs. 6–11 View FIGURES 5–7 View FIGURES 8–11 ); thoracic pleura usually with one longitudinal stripe (dorsal) ( Figs. 20–23 View FIGURES 19–23 ); body in older instars (3rds–5ths) broadly elongate-oval ( Figs. 7– 11 View FIGURES 5–7 View FIGURES 8–11 ) ( M. major )..................................................................................... 3
- Medial abdominal plates 1–3 with anterior margin narrowly dark brown except white medially or completely white, heavy brown area confined to lateral/sublateral areas ( Figs. 13–18 View FIGURES 12–14 View FIGURES 15–18 ); thoracic pleura generally with two longitudinal stripes, one dorsal, one ventral, but ventral stripe may be absent ( Figs. 25–28 View FIGURES 24–28 ); body in older instars (3rds–5ths) narrowly elongate-oval ( Figs. 14–18 View FIGURES 12–14 View FIGURES 15–18 ) ( M. minor ).................................................................................... 6
3 Tylus longer than juga ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 5–7 ); antennal segment 2 with dorsal surface rounded; mesonotum with posterior margin weakly extended posteriorly, straight laterally ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 5–7 ); thoracic pleura usually with longitudinal stripe well developed and unbroken ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 19–23 ); lengths, 2.06 ± 0.03 (2.02 ± 0.03); widths, 0.92 ± 0.02 (1.09 ± 0.02)............................second instar
- Tylus subequal to shorter than juga ( Figs. 7–11 View FIGURES 5–7 View FIGURES 8–11 ); antennal segment 2 with dorsal surface carinate; mesonotum with posterior margin strongly extended medially, arcuate laterally ( Figs. 7–11 View FIGURES 5–7 View FIGURES 8–11 ); thoracic pleura usually with longitudinal stripe usually well developed, but may be broken in lighter forms ( Figs. 21–23 View FIGURES 19–23 )................................................... 4
4. Tylus and juga subequal in length, wing pads lacking ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 5–7 ); lengths, 3.17 ± 0.07 (3.16 ± 0.06); widths, 1.31 ± 0.01 (1.75 ± 0.04)....................................................................................... third instar
- Tylus shorter than juga, leaving apical notch, wing pads easily discernible ( Figs. 8–11 View FIGURES 8–11 ).............................. 5
5 Wing pads shorter, reaching abdominal segment 2 ( Figs. 8–9 View FIGURES 8–11 ); lengths, 4.51 ± 0.15 (4.53 ± 0.15); widths, 2.00 ± 0.04 (2.40 ± 0.09)...................................................................................... fourth instar
- Wing pads longer, reaching abdominal segment 3 or 4 ( Figs. 10–11 View FIGURES 8–11 ); lengths, 7.62 ± 0.17 (7.78 ± 0.17); widths, 2.92 ± 0.06 (2.99 ± 0.11).................................................................................. fifth instar
6 Tylus and juga subequal in length ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 12–14 ); antennal segment 2 with dorsal surface rounded; mesonotum with posterior margin weakly extended medially, nearly straight laterally ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 12–14 ); thoracic pleura usually with two well-developed stripes, which are unbroken ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 24–28 ); lengths, 1.82 ± 00.8 (1.81 ± 0.08); widths, 0.79 ± 0.02 (0.94 ± 0.03)....................second instar
- Tylus shorter than juga, leaving apical notch shorter than juga ( Figs. 14–18 View FIGURES 12–14 View FIGURES 15–18 ); antennal segment 2 with dorsal surface carinate; mesonotum with posterior margin moderately to strongly extended medially, arcuate laterally ( Figs. 14–18 View FIGURES 12–14 View FIGURES 15–18 ); thoracic pleura usually with two well-developed stripes, which may be broken in lighter forms ( Figs. 26–28 View FIGURES 24–28 )......................... 7
7 Wing pads lacking ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 12–14 ); lengths, 3.05 ± 0.05 (3.08 ± 0.05); widths, 1.05 ± 0.02 (1.23 ± 0.04).............. third instar
- Wing pads easily discernible ( Figs. 15–18 View FIGURES 15–18 )................................................................. 8
8 Wing pads shorter, reaching abdominal segment 2 ( Figs. 15–16 View FIGURES 15–18 ); lengths, 4.52 ± 0.12 (4.63 ± 0.12); widths, 1.54 ± 0.02 (1.70 ±0.04)..................................................................................... fourth instar
- Wing pads longer, reaching abdominal segment 3 or 4 ( Figs. 17–18 View FIGURES 15–18 ); lengths, 6.64 ± 0.16 (6.89 ± 0.16); widths, 2.35 ± 0.02 (2.20 ± 0.05).................................................................................. fifth instar
1 Length was measured from apices of tylus and juga to apex of abdomen (two measurements); width across mesonotum and abdominal segments 3–4, whichever was widest (both measurements shown).
2 First instars of M. major and M. minor cannot be distinguished easily using morphological characters.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |