Philonthus neoniger Solodovnikov, 2009
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.3897/zookeys.5.59 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3792544 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038F87A1-FFC4-AA7B-01CC-FA3CFC356DC6 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Philonthus neoniger Solodovnikov |
status |
nom. nov. |
Philonthus neoniger Solodovnikov View in CoL , nom. nov. Taxonomy
Philonthus neoniger (the original combination Xanthopygoides niger ) is here moved from the subtribe Xanthopygina to Philonthus , the type genus of the subtribe Philonthina . This transfer is based on the following complex of character states shared by P. neoniger with other members of Philonthus : lack of empodial setae; pronotal hypomeron with superior marginal line deflexed under anterior angle of pronotum, and inferior marginal line becoming obsolete near lateral margin of procoxal cavity, both lines not joining each other ( Fig. 2 View Figs 2-4 ); prosternum fused to pronotum, notosternal sutures indistinct ( Fig. 2 View Figs 2-4 ); no translucent postcoxal process of pronotal hypomeron ( Fig. 2 View Figs 2-4 ); entire ligula; no infraorbital and mandibular ridges on head capsule. Such features of Philonthus neoniger as smooth pronotal disk with only one puncture in each of two dorsal “rows”, dense and rugose punctation of elytra and abdomen, and, especially, a rather peculiar shape of the aedeagus (Figs 3,4) allow it to be unambiguously placed in the subgenus Raucalius Tottenham, 1949 .
Members of the subtribe Xanthopygina , instead, are usually characterized by a complete postmandibular ridge; the inferior marginal line of pronotal hypomeron well separated from the superior marginal line, both lines continuing uninterrupted and separated along the prosternal margin. Also, unlike Philonthina , all members of Xanthopygina have a pair of empodial setae ( Smetana and Davies 2000).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |