Orthostixinae Meyrick, 1892
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.7717/peerj.7386 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:662A9A18-B620-45AA-B4B1-326086853316 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5767491 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038F87AD-2B01-FFA9-2EC5-5D59FC7A0919 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Orthostixinae Meyrick, 1892 |
status |
|
Orthostixinae Meyrick, 1892 View in CoL View at ENA
Orthostixinae were not included in our study. Sihvonen et al. (2011) showed this subfamily as deeply embedded within Ennominae , but unfortunately it was not represented by the type genus of the subfamily. These results agree with Holloway (1996) who examined Orthostixis Hübner, (1823) and suggested the inclusion in Ennominae despite the full development of hindwing vein M2, the presence of a forewing areole and the very broad base of the tympanal ansa. We sampled the species Naxa textilis (Walker, 1856) and Orthostixis cribraria (Hübner, 1799) , but only three and one marker were successfully sequenced for these samples, respectively. We included these species in the preliminary analyses but results were so unstable that we excluded them from the final analysis. Further research including fresh material and more genetic markers are needed to investigate the position of Orthostixinae conclusively.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |