Hydrophis ornatus ( Gray, 1842 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3869.4.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8F80DD5E-F5FC-40DF-BCE5-C404FA7A6577 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038F87C0-FFA0-FFCE-FF48-FDDEFAD5FB9E |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Hydrophis ornatus ( Gray, 1842 ) |
status |
|
Hydrophis ornatus ( Gray, 1842) / Hydrophis ocellatus Gray, 1849 .
Smith (1926) regarded H. ocellatus to be a subspecies of H. ornatus and referred Australian specimens previously included in H. ornatus to it. Later, H. o. ocellatus was raised to species level because of its distinctive DNA, colour pattern and a higher number of midbody scale rows compared with H. o. ornatus in Asia |(Rasmussen, Murphy, et al., 2011; Sanders, Lee, et al., 2013; L. A. Smith, 1974). However, the name H. ornatus is still used by most authors in Australia ( Brewer et al., 2006; Cogger, 1975, 2007; Lukoschek & Keogh, 2006; Wells, 2007; Wilson & Swan, 2010). Hydrophis ocellatus is a widespread species found in most tropical and subtropical Australian waters ( Brewer et al., 2006; Cogger, 1975, 2007; Redfield et al., 1978; L. A. Smith, 1974; Ward, 2000; Wassenberg, Milton, & Burridge, 2001). We have found no specimens or been otherwise able to confirm H. ornatus occurs in Australian waters. All the records we have examined of this complex belong to H. ocellatus . It is interesting that specimens of H. ornatus but not H. ocellatus have been collected in New Caledonia waters ( Ineich & Rasmussen, 1997), indicating that the two species exclude each other in some regions. There is no evidence that H. ornatus does occur in Australian waters. We therefore include H ornatus neither in the checklist nor in the list of possible Australian sea snakes.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.