Tuiplatynus sophronitis ( Broun, 1908 ) Larochelle & Larivière, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5041813 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:DF505A18-63A1-44BB-BF5D-13887FAE0DAD |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5041901 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038F87CF-8F0B-4841-DFED-1416A43E3BE9 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Tuiplatynus sophronitis ( Broun, 1908 ) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Tuiplatynus sophronitis ( Broun, 1908) View in CoL , new combination
Fig. 53 View Figures 53–56 , 96 View Figures 94–100 , 166 View Figures 165–166
Anchomenus sophronitis Broun, 1908: 349 View in CoL . Lectotype (here designated): male (BMNH) labeled “Type (circular red-bordered label; typed) / 2668. [male symbol] (hand-written) / New Zealand. Broun. Coll. Brit. Mus. 1922–482 (white label with red horizontal line; typed) / West Plains Southland (hand-written) / Anchomenus sophronitis View in CoL (hand-written) / LECTOTYPE [male symbol] Anchomenus sophronitis Broun, 1908 View in CoL designated by Larochelle & Larivière, 2021 (red label; typed).” Paralectotype: one female (BMNH) from the same locality as the lectotype, bearing a blue paralectotype label.
Agonum (Anchomenus) sophronitis: Csiki 1931: 865 View in CoL .
Anchomenus sophronitis: Hudson 1934: 174 View in CoL .
Ctenognathus sophronitis: Larochelle and Larivière 2007: 81 View in CoL , 111.
Description. Body length 10.0– 11.3 mm. Head, pronotum, and elytra mostly piceous black; lateral margins of pronotum and elytra reddish; abdomen piceous black; antennae and palpi rufotestaceous; femora dark yellow; tibiae and tarsi reddish. Microsculpture isodiametric on head, moderately transverse on pronotum, and isodiametric on elytra. Iridescence absent. Very shiny. Head. Mandibles moderately curved anteriorly. Labrum strongly transverse, deeply emarginate anteriorly. Mentum: medial tooth subtruncate apically; ten or eleven setae. Palpi with terminal segment truncate apically. Thorax. Pronotum slightly convex, impunctate, obsoletely wrinkled on disc, deeply wrinkled across apex and base, narrow, moderately cordate, widest before middle; apex slightly emarginate; anterolateral angles poorly developed, obtuse; anterior bead complete; sides moderately rounded, moderately sinuate posteriorly; lateral beads complete; lateral depressions narrow anteriorly, widened posteriorly, prolonged forward; posterolateral angles obtuse; laterobasal foveae very deep, moderately wide; posterior bead complete; base subtruncate. Elytra. Moderately convex, not sloping down toward apex. Shoulders moderately rounded. Sides moderately rounded. Scutellar striole impunctate. Striae shallow, finely punctate. Intervals depressed; interval 3 with three very deep, large (foveate) setiferous punctures. Umbilicate series with 16–19 setiferous punctures. Subapical sinuations moderate. Aedeagus. Lateral view ( Fig. 96 View Figures 94–100 ): moderately arcuate; base strongly convex dorsally, with basal lobe moderately wide; middle moderately convex dorsally, moderately concave ventrally, with dorsal membranous area moderately wide and moderately long; apex moderately convex dorsally, moderately concave ventrally, with extreme tip narrow and moderately long. Dorsal view: moderately wide, asymmetrical (ostium of membranous area deflected to the left); basal bulb moderately distant from membranous area.
Material examined. 127 specimens ( AMNZ, BMNH, JNNZ, LUNZ, MONZ, NZAC).
Geographic distribution ( Fig. 166 View Figures 165–166 ). South Island: CO, DN, FD, OL, SL.
Ecology. Lowland, montane, subalpine. Epigean, arboreal. Wet forests (beech, broadleaf). Associated with streams and mud flats. Shaded ground; wet soil. Nocturnal; hides during the day under logs and stones, and in moss growing on tree trunks. Gregarious.
Biology. Seasonality: September–March, May, August. Tenerals: March, May. Predacious (based on mouthpart morphology). Occasionally infested with fungi (Laboulbeniales).
Dispersal power. Subapterous (incapable of flight). Moderate runner.
Collecting techniques. Turning logs and stones; examining moss on tree trunks; pitfall trapping.
References. Larochelle and Larivière, 2001: 132 (as “ Anchomenus View in CoL ” sophronitis View in CoL ; catalogue; biology, dispersal power, ecology, geographic distribution, references), 2007: 81, 111 (as Ctenognathus sophronitis View in CoL ; list), 2016: 37 (as C. sophronitis View in CoL ; list).
Remark. Broun described Anchomenus sophronitis from two specimens, one of which (a male) could be located (BMNH) and is here designated as lectotype in order to preserve stability of nomenclature in the future.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Tuiplatynus sophronitis ( Broun, 1908 )
Larochelle & Larivière, Marie-Claude 2021 |
Ctenognathus sophronitis: Larochelle and Larivière 2007: 81
Larochelle A & Lariviere M-C. 2007: 81 |
Anchomenus sophronitis: Hudson 1934: 174
Hudson GV 1934: 174 |
Agonum (Anchomenus) sophronitis:
Csiki E. 1931: 865 |
Anchomenus sophronitis
Broun T. 1908: 349 |