Trichardis
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5733/afin.049.0210 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039087DE-FF8A-6D76-BF8B-9AE36014ADE0 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Trichardis |
status |
|
Key to Afrotropical species of Trichardis View in CoL View at ENA
Although the following key attempts to separate species without reference to characters of the male genitalia it is preferable that well preserved males are used and that identifications are confirmed by comparisons of the genitalia with the illustrations provided.
1 Anepisternal macroseta absent; pulvilli reduced in size and clearly shorter than empodium [unknown for rueppelii ]; T2 entirely pruinose; ơ genitalia as in Figs 27, 28 View Figs 23–28 ( Niger, Yemen and various Palaearctic countries) ............................................. .................................. leucocoma ( Wulp, 1899) View in CoL & rueppelii ( Wiedemann, 1828)
– Anepisternal macroseta present; pulvilli normal and approximately equal in length to empodium; T2 at least partly, if not entirely apruinose .................................... 2
2 Postpronotal lobe entirely pruinose ...................................................................... 3
– Postpronotal lobe partly to extensively apruinose .............................................. 10
3 Scutellum extensively apruinose .......................................................................... 4
– Scutellum extensively pruinose ............................................................................ 8
4 Cell r 5 extensively microtrichose; usually 2 ocellar macrosetae; hind femur with a few well-developed ventral tubercles (some higher than broad); ơ genitalia as in Figs 51, 52 View Figs 47–52 ( South Africa) ................................................. turneri Oldroyd, 1974 View in CoL
– Cell r 5 microtrichose only in distal half; usually 4 ocellar macrosetae; hind femur with at most poorly developed ventral tubercles (broader than high) .................. 5
5 Anepisternum entirely pruinose (even if only weakly anteroventrally) ............... 6
– Anepisternum apruinose anteroventrally .............................................................. 7
6 T2 yellowish; costal vein continues around wing margin beyond wing tip; wing membrane with distinct dark markings; ơ genitalia as in Figs 49, 50 View Figs 47–52 ( Botswana, Namibia, South Africa, Zimbabwe) ............................. testacea ( Macquart, 1838) View in CoL
– T2 dark red-brown; costal vein continues weakly, if at all, around wing margin beyond wing tip; wing membrane without distinct markings; ơ genitalia as in Figs 35, 36 View Figs 35–40 ( Chad) ..................................................................................... ornata sp. n.
7 Discal cell extensively microtrichose; hind femur dark red-brown; T2 dark red-brown; ơ genitalia as in Figs 53, 54 View Figs 53–56 ( Kenya, Tanzania) ...................... zinidi sp. n.
– Discal cell entirely lacking microtrichiae; hind femur brown-orange; T2 orange; ơ genitalia as in Figs 7, 8 View Figs 5–10 ( Namibia, Mozambique, South Africa, Zimbabwe) ......... ........................................................................................... apicalis Oldroyd, 1974 View in CoL
8 Anepisternum extensively apruinose; T2 apruinose ............................................. 9
– Anepisternum entirely pruinose; T2 extensively pruinose ( Namibia, South Africa) .............................................................................................. picta Hermann, 1906 View in CoL
9 Scutellar disc entirely pruinose; male terminalia not markedly elongate, as in Figs 19, 20 View Figs 17–22 ( Ethiopia, Gambia, Kenya, Senegal) ..................... grisescens Engel, 1924 View in CoL
– Scutellar disc partly apruinose (i.e. weak centrally); male terminalia markedly elongate, as in Figs 47, 48 View Figs 47–52 ( Botswana, Namibia, Zimbabwe) ................................ ...................................................................................... terminalis Oldroyd, 1974 View in CoL
10 Hind tibia with well-developed ventrodistal spur............................................... 11
– Hind tibia lacking ventrodistal spur.................................................................... 12
11 Mystax entirely blackish; T2 entirely apruinose; ơ genitalia as in Figs 25, 26 View Figs 23–28 ( Somalia) ......................................................................................... lavignei sp. n.
– Mystax with both shiny yellowish and black macrosetae; T2 apruinose except for silver pruinose patches posterolaterally; ơ genitalia as in Figs 23, 24 View Figs 23–28 ( DR Congo, Tanzania)................................................................... katangaensis Oldroyd, 1970 View in CoL
12 Discal cell lacking microtrichiae, especially proximally and adjacent to veins..13
– Discal cell extensively microtrichose (members of cribrata View in CoL species group) ..... 18
13 Mystax entirely white, yellow or orange, lacking black setae; antennal segments predominantly yellowish or light brownish ........................................................ 14
– Mystax with some black setae; antennal segments entirely or almost entirely dark red-brown............................................................................................................ 16
14 Antennal postpedicel clavate (L:D <3.0); costal vein ends at wing tip; veins R5+M1, M2 and M3+CuA1 not reaching wing margin ( Fig. 4 View Figs 1– 4 ); cell r 5 almost entirely lacking microtrichiae; ơ genitalia as in Figs 15, 16 View Figs 11–16 ( Namibia, South Africa)..................... .......................................................................................................... effrena sp. n.
– Antennal postpedicel spindle shaped (L:D> 3.0); costal vein continues around wing tip and along much of hind margin of wing; veins R5+M1, M2 and M3+CuA1 reaching wing margin (e.g. Fig. 3 View Figs 1– 4 ); cell r 5 at least weakly microtrichose ........... 15
15 A yellowish or orange species; ơ genitalia as in Figs 31, 32 View Figs 29–34 ( Eritrea) ................... .......................................................................................................... mellina sp. n.
– A dark red-brown to blackish species; ơ genitalia as in Figs 17, 18 View Figs 17–22 ( Gambia) ...... ........................................................................................................... glabra sp. n.
16 Postpronotal and postalar lobes orange and contrasting with dark red-brown to blackish mesonotum; legs ventrally orange-brown; smaler species (wing length ca 4.0 mm); ơ genitalia as in Figs 41, 42 View Figs 41–46 ( Socotra I., Yemen) .................................... ..................................................................................... pohli Geller-Grimm, 2002 View in CoL
– Postpronotal and postalar lobes blackish and not contrasting with mesonotum; legs uniform dark red-brown to blackish; bigger species (wing length ca 5.5 mm).. 17
17 Mesonotal macrosetae, anepisternal seta(e) and ocellar setae black; ơ genitalia as in Figs 33, 34 View Figs 29–34 ( Socotra I., Yemen) .............................. nigrescens ( Ricardo, 1903) View in CoL
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.