Enterosora Baker, Timehri
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.630.3.2 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10425248 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03923D56-C63B-A02C-71B2-FAEFFB2CE731 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Enterosora Baker, Timehri |
status |
|
Enterosora Baker, Timehri View in CoL 5: 218. 1886.
Enterosora View in CoL is clearly related to Zygophlebia and Ceradenia View in CoL and was revised by Bishop & Smith (1992). The close relationship of all three genera has been suspected on the basis of morphological characters since the last two were described ( Bishop 1988, 1989). All three genera generally lack hydathodes on the blades adaxially, but Enterosora View in CoL lacks soral paraphyses. Many, but not all, species of Enterosora View in CoL have parenchyma with numerous, large intercellular air spaces in the mesophyll, and this feature results in a spongiose blade texture. However, this character is viewed by Sundue (2010) as homoplastic, occurring in various degrees throughout the grammitid clade. Soral shape is also variable, from elongate to round, and sori are often somewhat sunken in the leaf tissue, but these characters are also not unique to Enterosora View in CoL . Beyond these relationships, the three genera are most closely related to several other New World grammitid genera, well removed from affinities to most Old World grammitids (e.g., Shalisko et al. 2019).
Recent molecular work by Bauret et al. (2017) and Shalisko et al. (2019) has led to a revised and broader circumscription of Enterosora View in CoL , now to include the segregate genus Zygophlebia but exclude two anomalous species, Enterosora parietina View in CoL and E. gilpinae View in CoL . Thus redefined, Enterosora View in CoL includes about 20 species in tropical America, continental Africa, and Madagascar. Previous monographic and floristic treatments of Enterosora View in CoL , by Bishop & Smith (1992), Smith & Bishop (1995), Parris (2005), and Smith et al. (2018) were based entirely on morphology and included 8–10 species. The two molecular studies cited above suggest that Enterosora View in CoL , as defined by Bishop & Smith (1992) and several subsequent works, is not monophyletic, and that at least three tropical American species included by Bishop (1989) in Zygophlebia – Z. sectifrons View in CoL (Antilles, Costa Rica to Bolivia, and the type of the genus), Z. mathewsii View in CoL ( Costa Rica to Peru), and Z. cornuta View in CoL ( Costa Rica and Panama) – fall very close to species of Enterosora View in CoL in phylogenetic analyses. The simplest solution is to define Enterosora View in CoL more broadly, to include nearly all species of Zygophlebia (excluding Z. werffii ; see below). However, two species usually treated in Enterosora View in CoL , one American and one East African-Madagascan, are discordant even with a broad definition of Enterosora View in CoL . These are now included in a newly described genus, Parrisia ( Shalisko et al. 2019) View in CoL , discussed below. Most of the necessary new combinations in Enterosora View in CoL were made by Shalisko et al. (2019), but not for E. dudleyi View in CoL , unsampled in their work.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Enterosora Baker, Timehri
Kessler, Michael, Smith, Alan R., Øllgaard, Benjamin, Matos, Fernando B. & Moran, Robbin C. 2023 |
Enterosora
Enterosora Baker 1886: 218 |