Lasioglossum (Sphecodogastra) oenotherae (Stevens 1920)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4352.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7C684128-FFA7-48AA-B395-B9C6BC39353A |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6003179 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0392879B-732E-AB7C-43D5-FB1CFCE4F908 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Lasioglossum (Sphecodogastra) oenotherae (Stevens 1920) |
status |
|
Lasioglossum (Sphecodogastra) oenotherae (Stevens 1920) View in CoL View at ENA (lusorium group)
County records: Ingham, Kent, Livingston, Washtenaw.
Notes. The nesting biology of Ontario populations have been studied in detail ( Knerer & Mackay 1969). Records of this species are largely absent from the Midwest, although the species occurs widely from the Central Plains to Maritime Canada ( Gibbs et al. 2013; McGinley 2003). Multiple attempts by JG were made to capture female L. oenotherae in Ingham County from Oenothera spp. ( Onagraceae ) in the early and late hours of the day without success, but two males were obtained from other flowers during the middle of the day when females would not typically be active ( McGinley 2003).
Material examined. Ingham Co.: Lake Lansing , Haslett, N 42.749 W84.4, 20 Aug. 2013 (1 ♂ JBWM) GoogleMaps ; Harrison Park, East Lansing , N42.754 W84.486, 25 Aug. 2013 (1 ♂ JBWM) GoogleMaps ; Livingston Co.: E. S. George Reserve, 3 Jul. 19 (5/9)5, Oenothera fruticosa (as tetragona) ( UMMZ) . Kent Co.: Grand Rapids , 19 Jun. 2014, Oenothera biennis L. (♀ http://bugguide.net/node/view/940949).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |