Rhinobatos austini Ebert & Gon, 2017
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4947.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7F3B4794-65CF-4691-A330-78A423F2606F |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4614907 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039287A1-9522-FFC5-CFF7-5F06FDEC2799 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Rhinobatos austini Ebert & Gon, 2017 |
status |
|
Rhinobatos austini Ebert & Gon, 2017
Austin’s Guitarfish
Rhinobatos austini Ebert & Gon, 2017: 205 , figs. 1–6. Holotype: SAIAB 75223 About SAIAB . Type locality: Near Port Shepstone GoogleMaps , KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, 30°50'S, 30°29'E.
Local synonymy: Rhinobatus annulatus (Natal form): Wallace, 1967b: 27, fig. 15 (in part); Compagno et al., 1989: 78, pl. (in part); Heemstra & Heemstra, 2004: 78. Rhinobatos holcorhynchus: Séret et al., 2016a: 98 , fig. 10.20 (in part, illustration is of R. austini ). Rhinobatos austini: Ebert & Gon, 2017: 205 , Figs. 1 View FIGURE 1 –6.
South Africa voucher material: Holotype: SAIAB 75223 About SAIAB ; paratypes: SAIAB 186420 About SAIAB , SAIAB 193574 About SAIAB . Non-type: SAIAB 11125 About SAIAB .
South African distribution: Port Shepstone north to KZN border with Mozambique.
Remarks: Accounts by Wallace (1967b, see fig. 15) and Compagno et al. (1989, see illustration on p. 79) described a Rhinobatos annulatus “Natal ” form that was distinguished by large brown spots from the “Cape” form. However, the “Natal” form is actually Rhinobatos austini , while the “Cape” form, which is now assigned to the genus Acroteriobatus , has numerous small eyespots on its dorsal surface. Furthermore, the recently described R. austini was also misidentified with R. holcorhynchus due to both species having a black teardrop-shaped blotch on the ventral surface of its snout. Recent re-examination of specimens from Mozambique and Madagascar has expanded the known range of R. austini . This species appears to inhabit a mostly coastal habitat from inshore to 107 m, but mostly less than 75 m depth, while R. holcorhynchus appears to occur in deeper water at depths from 75 m to at least 350 m ( Séret et al., 2016a; Ebert & Gon, 2017). The illustration in the species account of R. holcorhynchus in Séret et al. (2016a, see fig. 10.20) is actually R. austini .
Conservation status: DD (2019).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Rhinobatos austini Ebert & Gon, 2017
Ebert, David A., Wintner, Sabine P. & Kyne, Peter M. 2021 |
Rhinobatos austini Ebert & Gon, 2017: 205
Ebert, D. A. & Gon, O. 2017: 205 |