Pteroplatytrygon violacea ( Bonaparte, 1832 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4947.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7F3B4794-65CF-4691-A330-78A423F2606F |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4697766 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039287A1-9537-FFD0-CFF7-59A4FDE926B4 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Pteroplatytrygon violacea ( Bonaparte, 1832 ) |
status |
|
Pteroplatytrygon violacea ( Bonaparte, 1832) View in CoL View at ENA
Pelagic Stingray
Trygon violacea Bonaparte, 1832 View in CoL : fasc. 1, punt. 6, Pl. 155. Syntypes: ANSP 385 About ANSP , ANSP 386 About ANSP ,?NMW 91239 (dry). Type locality: Italy, western Mediterranean Sea .
Local synonymy: Trygon purpurea View in CoL : Smith [A.] in M̹ller & Henle, 1841: 160, pl. 52 (type locality South Africa, no known types; based on drawing by A. Smith [BMNH]); Bleeker, 1860: 58; Gilchrist, 1902: 169. Dasybatis purpurea : Thompson, 1914: 163; von Bonde & Swart, 1923: 16; Barnard, 1925: 79; Barnard, 1959: 27. Dasyatis purpurea: Barnard, 1934: 229 View in CoL . Dasyatis purpureus: Smith, 1949a: 71 View in CoL ; Smith, 1961a: 71; Smith, 1965: 71. Dasyatis violacea: Compagno & Heemstra, 1984: 5 View in CoL ; Compagno, 1986: 137, fig. 30.5. Pteroplatytrygon violacea: Compagno et al., 1989: 104 View in CoL , pl.; NPOA, 2013: 61; Ebert & Dando, 2014: 95, fig.; da Silva et al., 2015: 246; Ebert & van Hees, 2015: 147; Last et al., 2016h: 356; Last et al., 2016i: 604, fig. 25.75; Weigmann, 2016: 976.
South Africa voucher material: SAIAB 25936.
South African distribution: False Bay (WC) to Algoa Bay (EC), but likely wider ranging along the coast.
Remarks: The species has a complicated taxonomic history in South Africa having been confused with Pateobatis fai in KZN. Smith [A.] (in M̹ller & Henle, 1841) described Trygon purpurea (= P. violacea ) citing South Africa as the type locality, but the species apparently was not seen again until a specimen was caught off Kalk Bay in False Bay in 1933 ( Barnard, 1934). Although Wallace (1967c) referred to Dasyatis purpureus , his description and figure 24 are clearly that of P. fai or a similar looking species, but not P. violacea . The species was once thought to be quite rare in South Africa, with only a few specimens known ( Compagno et al., 1989). However, it appears to be somewhat commonly caught in the chokka (= squid) fishery, but is usually not reported as bycatch.
Conservation status: LC (2019).
SAIAB |
South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Pteroplatytrygon violacea ( Bonaparte, 1832 )
Ebert, David A., Wintner, Sabine P. & Kyne, Peter M. 2021 |
Pteroplatytrygon violacea:
Compagno 1989: 104 |
Dasyatis violacea:
Compagno & Heemstra 1984: 5 |
Dasyatis purpureus
: Smith 1949: 71 |
Dasyatis purpurea:
Barnard 1934: 229 |
Dasybatis purpurea
Thompson 1914: 163 |
Trygon violacea
Bonaparte 1832 |