Megaraphidia Cockerell, 1907
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3784.4.4 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D5E03502-7BD3-41F4-A4CF-5537B1462A23 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6131149 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039287A3-FE0B-371F-23C7-6B72FCF9FB4F |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Megaraphidia Cockerell, 1907 |
status |
|
Genus Megaraphidia Cockerell, 1907 View in CoL
Megaraphidia Cockerell, 1907: 606 View in CoL ; Cockerell 1908: 342 (as a possible subgenus of Raphidia View in CoL ); Cockerell 1909a: 73; Cockerell 1909b: 78; Cockerell 1912: 216 (as a possible subgenus of Raphidia View in CoL ); Handlirsch 1913: 812; Handlirsch 1920 –1921 [1921]: 255; Cockerell & Custer 1925: 295; Martynov 1925a: 244, 245; Carpenter 1936: 145, 146; Metzger 1960: 41; Oswald 1990: 160 (as a synonym of Raphidia View in CoL ); Aspöck et al. 1991: 536, 537, 665; Engel 2002: 21 (as a tentative synonym of Raphidia View in CoL ).
Type species. Megaraphidia elegans Cockerell, 1907 , by monotypy.
Diagnosis. Relatively large raphidiids (forewing up to 14 mm long). Both wings: relatively long ScP [short in Archiraphidia , Florissantoraphidia gen. nov.]; short, rather pale pterostigma [long in Florissantoraphidia gen. nov.] in which incorporated branch of RA clearly visible [incorporated branch of RA poorly visible in Archiraphidia ]. Forewing: costal space broad [relatively narrow in Florissantoraphidia gen. nov.]; branches of CuA, M long [short in Archiraphidia ], mainly forked [mainly simple in Archiraphidia , Florissantoraphidia gen. nov.].
Species included. Two species from Florissant, Megaraphidia elegans and M. exhumata (Cockerell, 1909) , comb. nov.
Remarks. Two species included in this genus have very similar venation, distinguished as indicated in their diagnoses. However, they may represent one variable species.
The venation of this genus is most similar to that of the extant Palearctic genus Phaeostigma (41 species) distributed mainly in the eastern Mediterranean. In particular, they share a strongly broadened costal space; branches of CuA to RP mainly forked; and a long ScP. However, the majority of Phaeostigma species possess two or more branches of RA incorporated in the pterostigma, and/or 3ra-rp is located distad the pterostigma. The venation of a few Phaeostigma species differs from that of Megaraphidia species only in small details. Nevertheless, the possible synonymization of two these genera is premature. Further, among other considerations, the body of Megaraphidia (the senior name) is unknown.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Megaraphidia Cockerell, 1907
Makarkin, Vladimir N. & Archibald, S. Bruce 2014 |
Megaraphidia
Engel 2002: 21 |
Aspock 1991: 536 |
Oswald 1990: 160 |
Metzger 1960: 41 |
Carpenter 1936: 145 |
Cockerell 1925: 295 |
Martynov 1925: 244 |
Handlirsch 1913: 812 |
Cockerell 1912: 216 |
Cockerell 1909: 73 |
Cockerell 1909: 78 |
Cockerell 1908: 342 |
Cockerell 1907: 606 |