Dorsetensia regrediens ( Haug, 1893 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5252/geodiversitas2022v44a27 |
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E4896081-9312-4EA6-AE33-AAC44201748E |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7149064 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0394878D-FF8E-7B14-1ABA-FB53FA50DDD1 |
treatment provided by |
Admin |
scientific name |
Dorsetensia regrediens ( Haug, 1893 ) |
status |
|
Dorsetensia regrediens ( Haug, 1893) [m] ( Fig. 14U View FIG )
Witchellia regrediens Haug, 1893: 318 , pl. 10, fig. 7.
Dorsetensia edouardiana – Buckman 1892: 304, pl. 52, figs 8-13, 15-17.
Dorsetensia (Nannina) regrediens – Pavia 1983: 67, pl. 6, fig. 8.
Nannina regrediens – Fernández-López 1985: 119, pl. 10, fig. 2.
Dorsetensia regrediens – Dietze et al. 2011a: 215, pl. 1, figs 19-22.
MATERIAL EXAMINED. — JRi3.28.1 .
MEASUREMENTS. — See Table 28.
DESCRIPTION
The only available specimen is small with a discoidal shell, a wide umbilicus, almost vertical umbilical wall, rounded umbilical edge, and gently convex flanks. The ventral region cannot be seen, nor the shape of the aperture, although the specimen looks almost complete. The simple and relatively dense falcoid-sigmoid ribs persist to the end of the spiral.
REMARKS
The most similar species is Dorsetensia edouardiana (d’Orbigny 1845: 392) , but it is larger and more involute and has more sigmoid ribbing. According to Dietze et al. (2011a: 217), a LT of D. regrediens has never been selected. The same authors ( Dietze et al. 2011a: 217) interpreted D. edouardiana (d’Orbigny, 1845) , D. pulchra (Buckman, 1892) , D. regrediens ( Haug, 1893) , and D. lennieri ( Brasil, 1894) as microconchiate “species”, which could be the dimorphic couple of D. tessoniana (d’Orbigny, 1845) [M]. However, several of the specimens figured as D. edouardiana by Huf (1968) and by Dietze et al. (2011a) seem rather to represent macroconchiate forms. If the idea proposed by Dietze et al. (2011a) were true, all four taxa would be synonymous.
DISTRIBUTION
The type of D. regrediens is from the “Oolithe ferrugineuse” of Saint-Vigor, near Bayeux, France ( Haug 1893; Dietze et al. 2011a). In Frogden Quarry (Dorset, England), D. regrediens occurs in the Inferior Oolite Formation, bed 4b, Lower Bajocian, the Humphriesianum Zone, Romani Subzone, Bj-14 horizon ( Callomon & Chandler 1990; Dietze et al. 2011a: 218). In Chaudon, Digne area (SE France), in the Iberian ranges ( Spain), and in the Atlas Mountains ( Morocco) , the species is present in the Romani Subzone, the lower part of the Humphriesianum Zone ( Pavia 1983; Fernández-López 1985; Sadki 1996). The only Subbetic specimen is from the Humphriesianum Zone, Romani (= Cycloides) Subzone of Sierra de Ricote (Murcia Region).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Dorsetensia regrediens ( Haug, 1893 )
Sandoval, José 2022 |
Dorsetensia regrediens
DIETZE V. & SCHWEIGERT G. & FIDDER U. & WANNENMACHER N. 2011: 215 |
Dorsetensia (Nannina) regrediens
PAVIA G. 1983: 67 |
Witchellia regrediens
HAUG E. 1893: 318 |