Singaporemma singulare Shear, 1978
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4392.2.6 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E0D597C5-194B-4EF0-AD6D-3A178F8DD2F7 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5983984 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039487ED-FFDC-4934-35BC-FE3CFAE2A9F5 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Singaporemma singulare Shear, 1978 |
status |
|
Singaporemma singulare Shear, 1978 View in CoL
Figures 6C–c View FIGURE 6 , 9A View FIGURE 9
Singaporemma singularis Shear, 1978: 36 , figs 108–111
S. singulare Lin et al., 2017: 47 View in CoL , figs 22A–H, 23A–E, G–H, 24A–H, 25A–E, 26A–D.
Examined material. Holotype ♂ and Paratype 1♀ ( AMNH), SINGAPORE: near MacRitchie Reservoir, 25 October 1950, M.W.F. Tweedie leg.
Other material. 5♂ and 4♀ ( SUMNH), SINGAPORE: Central Catchment Nature Reserve , Treetop Walk, 103°48.490′N, 1°21.222′E, 28 August 2015, S. Li and Y. Tong leg. GoogleMaps
Diagnosis. Male of S. singulare differs from those of S. bifurcata and S. wulongensis by the embolus without furcate tip ( Fig. 6c View FIGURE 6 vs. Fig. 6e–f View FIGURE 6 ); from male of S. adjacens by the slender, narrower embolus ( Fig. 6c View FIGURE 6 vs. Fig. 6h View FIGURE 6 ); from male of S. takensis sp. n. by the nearly straight embolus ( Fig. 6c View FIGURE 6 vs. Fig. 6g View FIGURE 6 ); from male of S. banxiaoensis , S. halongense , and S. lenachanae by the embolic base starts from the centre of bulbous prolateral surface ( Fig. 6C View FIGURE 6 vs. Fig. 6A–B, 6D View FIGURE 6 ) and the knife-shaped embolic tip ( Fig. 6c View FIGURE 6 vs. Fig. 6a–b, 6d View FIGURE 6 ), but the blunt embolic tip in S. halongense and S. lenachanae ( Fig. 6a, 6d View FIGURE 6 ), the larger palpal tibia, shorter embolus in S. banxiaoensis ( Fig. 6B, 6b View FIGURE 6 ). Female of S. singulare can be distinguished from the females of all other congeners with exception of S. lenachanae by the absence of central process ( Fig. 9A View FIGURE 9 vs. Figs 2E View FIGURE 2 , 5C–D View FIGURE 5 , 7A–C View FIGURE 7 , 8A–B View FIGURE 8 ). Female of S. singulare is closer to S. lenachanae in having a similar configuration of vulva, but can be distinguished from the latter by the shorter lateral horns, the wider postgenital plate, and the vulval ducts bent forward ( Fig. 9A View FIGURE 9 vs. Fig. 9B View FIGURE 9 ).
Description. See Lin et al., 2017: 47.
Distribution. Singapore ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 ).
Remarks. Shear (1978) originally described S. singulare from Singapore that was appointed to type species of the genus Singaporemma . Because only the male specimen was available at that time, he illustrated an embolus of the right palp that was said to be “curving sharply posteriorly” ( Shear, 1978: 36, figs 109–110). Schwendinger and Košulič (2015) suggested that Shear’s description of the male of S. singulare was doubtful because it was based on the only male specimen, and they suspect that an atypical specimen may have been used to describe the male palp of S. singulare ( Schwendinger & Košulič, 2015) . After re-examining the holotype of the species and photographed its left palp ( Fig. 6C–c View FIGURE 6 ), we can confirm that a deformed embolus was indeed described by Shear (1978).
AMNH |
American Museum of Natural History |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Singaporemma singulare Shear, 1978
Yan, Fanhu & Lin, Yucheng 2018 |
Singaporemma singularis
Shear, 1978 : 36 |
S. singulare Lin et al., 2017 : 47
Lin et al., 2017 : 47 |