Motonerus Hansen, 1989
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.173209 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6261625 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039587DB-FFAF-2824-FEA1-661D4363F8EB |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Motonerus Hansen, 1989 |
status |
|
Motonerus Hansen, 1989 View in CoL
Motonerus Hansen, 1989: 256 View in CoL
Diagnosis. Very small to small beetles (1.5–2.8 mm); antennal grooves absent; median part of prosternum carinate, weakly divided from lateral parts, with shallow to very deep anteromedial excision ( Figs. 42–51 View FIGURES 41 – 53 ); elytral margins with more or less distinct denticulation at least at elytral base ( Figs. 54–59 View FIGURES 54 – 64 ); elytral intervals moderately convex to subcostate; each elytron with 9 elytral series; preepisternal elevation in the form of an elevate bulge bearing a longitudinal carina or plate (1.6–6.0 longer than wide), sometimes bearing a deep concave median area ( Figs. 32–41 View FIGURES 32 – 40 View FIGURES 41 – 53 ); postcoxal ridges on metaventrite not connecting but bent posteriad medially and forming a longitudinal ridge in anteromedian part of metaventrite; anterolateral ridge on metaventrite missing; femoral lines absent or only weakly developed; median part of male sternite 9 crescentlike ( Figs. 52, 53 View FIGURES 41 – 53 ).
Differential diagnosis. Motonerus is easily distinguishable from all other New World megasternine genera by the combination of the following three characters: (1) prosternum without antennal grooves; (2) metaventrite without anterolateral ridge, and (3) preepisternal elevation laminar, narrow or widely elongate with deep median concave area. Additionally, the presence of the anteromedian excision on pronotum is unique for Motonerus and not known from any other genus in the Megasternini worldwide. However, while this character is very helpful for identification, it is often difficult to observe (see above for details). Smaller species can be easily confused with Oosternum Sharp, 1882 when the ventral characters are not examined.
The genus is also generally recognizable using the generic key presented by Hansen (1991), but with an adaptation of couplet 26:
26. Anterior margin of prosternum with shallow to very distinct anteromedian excision; antennal grooves missing; lateral margins of elytra with very distinct to fine denticulation at least basally; mesosternal elevation lamellar to widely prolonged (up to 1.6× longer than wide), when <3.0× longer than wide, then with deep median concave area; metasternum with or without median impression; elytral intervals moderately convex to subcostate ................................................................................................... Motonerus
– Anterior margin of prosternum without such excision; antennal grooves present or missing; elytral margin without denticulation or with fine serration; mesosternal elevation lamellar to variably shaped, never with deep median concave area; metasternum never with median impression; elytral intervals variably shaped ............................... 27
Many of the characters used by Hansen (1989, 1991) for delimiting the genus vary much more than previously known. Consequently, the modified generic diagnosis and key couplet are necessary to reliably distinguish the genus. However, as many species are still likely undescribed, we feel a full generic description is still premature.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Sphaeridiinae |
Motonerus Hansen, 1989
Ek, Martin Fiká Č & Short, Andrew Edward Z. 2006 |
Motonerus
Hansen 1989: 256 |