Trogon rufus, AMAZONICUS TODD, 1943

Dickens, Jeremy Kenneth, Bitton, Pierre-Paul, Bravo, Gustavo A. & Silveira, Luís Fábio, 2021, Species limits, patterns of secondary contact and a new species in the Trogon rufus complex (Aves: Trogonidae), Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 193, pp. 499-540 : 521-522

publication ID

BD62F699-AA76-4EE3-8B78-C4007112F103

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BD62F699-AA76-4EE3-8B78-C4007112F103

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03958877-FFBC-FFB7-70D4-204CFA89FCD5

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Trogon rufus
status

 

TROGON RUFUS AMAZONICUS TODD, 1943 View in CoL

Proposed English name: Eastern black-throated trogon.

Trogon atricollis Pelzeln J, 1868 , Zur Orn. Bras., pp. 226–331, Borba (right bank Rio Madeira), Barra do Rio Negro (= Manaus), and Marabitanas Cucuí (upper Rio Negro). – Trogon atricollis (Race A) Grant, 1892 , Cat. Birds. Brit. Mus., 17, pp. 455–458, Borba (Rio Madeira), Eastern Peru and Ecuador. – Trogon atricollis atricollis Hellmayr, 1906 , Novit. Zool., 13, p. 380: Prata (near Belém). – Trogon rufus rufus Hellmayr, 1910 View in CoL , Novit. Zool., 17 p. 387 [Borba and Humayta (= Humaita)], Rio Madeira. – Trogonurus curucui View in CoL curucui Ridgway, 1911 View in CoL , Bull. U.S. Nat. Mus.50 (5), p.764 – Trogon rufus Snethlage, 1914 View in CoL , Part. Bol. Mus. Goeldi. 8, p. 208: Rio Guamá (Sta. Maria de S. Miguel), Rio Tapajos (Villa Braga), Rio Purús, Rio Jamundá (Faro). – Trogonurus curucui View in CoL curucui Cory, 1919 View in CoL , Field Mus. Nat. Hist. Zool. Ser., 13, p. 325. – Trogonurus rufus rufus Stone, 1928 , Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 80, p. 158. – Trogonurus rufus rufus Pinto, 1938 , Rev. Mus. Paul. 22, p. 289. – Trogon curucui sulphureus Griscom & Greenway, 1941 , Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 88, pp. 180–181. – Trogon rufus amazonicus Todd, 1943 View in CoL , Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 56, p. 11, Villa Braga (left bank Rio Tapajos), Brazil. – Trogon rufus amazonicus Pinto, 1947 View in CoL , Arquic. de Zool. do Est, de São Paulo, 5,

p. 371, Rio Arapiuns. – Trogon rufus amazonicus Zimmer, 1948 View in CoL . American Museum Novitates no. 1380, pp. 26–31. – Trogon rufus rufus Pinto, 1950 View in CoL , Papeíes Avilsos de Zoologia, 9(9), pp. 89–136. – Trogon rufus sulphureus Gyldenstolpe, 1951 View in CoL , Ark. F. Zool., Kungl. Sv. Vet. Akad. Handl., 22 (3), pp. 85–87: female from Igarapé Castanha, Amazonas, Brazil. – Trogon rufus rufus Pinto, 1978 View in CoL , Novo Catal. das Aves View in CoL do Brasil, 1a Parte, p. 218, S Venezuela, the Guianas and north Brazil, east of the Rio Negro and Madeira.

Diagnosis: Yellow or greenish-yellow eye-rings diagnostic against T. r. rufus , T. chrysochloros and T. tenellus . Smaller, with less serrated bill than T. chrysochloros . Males: Uppertail hue warmer (more coppery) than T. r. rufus (> 587 nm) but generally cooler (greener) than T. r. sulphureus . Subterminal band of greener coloration present and breast band usually absent, unlike in T. r. rufus , T. chrysochloros , T. tenellus and sometimes T. cupreicuada . Compared to T. r. rufus , the wing panel barring is less dense and percentage area black lower due to the broader white wing bars. Compared to T. r. sulphureus , the undertail barring is denser with narrower black and white bars, whilst the wing panel has a distinctly lower percentage area black and generally narrower black bars. Differs from T. tenellus by the more coppery uppertail, breast band absence, and denser undertail barring with narrower black bars. Compared to T. cupreicauda , the undertail barring is denser with narrower black and white bars. Females: Not safely separable from other Amazonian subspecies but the brown coloration generally more yellow-brown, and the uppertail, head and chest more saturated than in T. r. rufus . Compared to T. r. sulphureus , the undertail barring is denser with narrower black and white bars and lower percentage area black, whilst the wing-panel barring is generally denser with narrower light brown bars. In terms of coloration, the mantle is often yellower and sometimes more saturated, and the chest often yellower and brighter. Against T. chrysochloros , the undertail barring generally has a lower percentage area black and slightly lower density, the wing panel barring is generally less dense with slightly broader bar widths, the head is generally less yellow, mantle more saturated, and chest generally more saturated, and lighter. Compared to T. tenellus , the undertail barring is generally denser with narrower black bars and a lower percentage area black. The wing panel barring generally has slightly broader black bars, narrower light brown bars and greater percentage area black. The head colour is less yellow and less saturated, mantle more saturated, chest yellower, lighter and generally less saturated, and uppertail more saturated. They differ from T. cupreicauda by the lack of an extensive brown wash on the undertail, whilst the undertail and wing-panel barring are generally denser with narrower light brown bars, the brown coloration is generally more saturated, and chest lighter.

Song: Fewer notes per phrase, slower pace, longer note and pause durations, lower note frequencies and narrower note bandwidths than T. chrysochloros . Lower note frequencies than T. tenellus . Fewer notes and longer note durations than T. cupreicauda . Not safely separable from other Amazonian subspecies but generally has more notes per phrase (no twonote phrases), slower pace and sometimes longer note durations. Generally higher frequencies, particularly of the fist note, which give it an ‘introductory’ nature, compared to T.. rufus .

Distribution and habitat: Terra firme forests of southeastern Amazonia, south of the Amazon and east of the Madeira Rivers in Brazil. An intergradation zone with T. r. rufus stretches along the southern bank of the Amazon and with T. r. sulphureus along both margins of the Madeira River. Absent from Marajó Island.

Type material: Holotype: CM 75224 (Adult Male). Villa Braga , Tapajos R., Brazil, 01.xii.1919, S. M. Klages.

Description: Smallest body mass of all taxa, although the relatively short wing and tail lengths are generally longer than for T. tenellus and T. cupreicauda but much shorter than T. chrysochloros . Males: The uppertail hue is generally slightly coppery-green but varies from deep reddish-copper to shiny olivegreen. Subterminal tailband of greener coloration present but often indistinct. Head and mantle coppery green. Rump usually more golden-green. Chest bluegreen to golden-green. Belly yellow. Breast band typically absent, although sometimes inconspicuous in intergradation zone with T. r. rufus . Undertail barring like T. r. rufus with narrow black bars, moderate white bars, moderate density and low percentage area black. Wing panel barring with narrow to moderate black bars, broad white bars, low density and relatively low percentage area black. Moderate terminal tailband width. Females: Head colour generally less saturated and darker Dark Brown to Dark Yellow Brown. Mantle, generally yellower, poorly to highly saturated Dark Yellowish Brown to Dark Olive Brown. Overall, chest slightly more saturated, lighter Olive Brown to Dark Yellowish Brown. Uppertail highly saturated Dark Reddish Brown. Extent of brown on undertail usually as edging around black patch, absent or sometimes rectriced to base of outer rectrices. Undertail barring with high bar density, narrow black bars, generally narrow white bars and low percentage area black. Wing panel barring with moderate density, moderate to broad black and light brown bars and generally high percentage area black. Bareparts: Eye-rings typically yellow or yellow-green but with a moderate number green and small numbers blue-grey, blue and white in the intergradation zone with T. r. rufus and further south in the Madeira–Tapajos interfluve. Tarsi usually grey – especially in the intergradation zones and Madeira–Tapajos interfluve – or olive and occasionally pink to purplish-grey (single female).

Song: Moderate number of notes per phrase, slow pace, long introductory and loudsong note durations, moderate pause following the introductory note, introductory note with moderately low peak and high frequencies and low low-frequency, loudsong with moderately low peak and high frequencies and low lowfrequency. Narrow introductory note and loudsong note bandwidths. Similar to T. r. rufus but with a generally higher first note, giving it a more ‘introductory’ quality. Two-note phrases not known from recorded songs.

R

Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Chordata

Class

Aves

Order

Trogoniformes

Family

Trogonidae

Genus

Trogon

Loc

Trogon rufus

Dickens, Jeremy Kenneth, Bitton, Pierre-Paul, Bravo, Gustavo A. & Silveira, Luís Fábio 2021
2021
Loc

Trogon rufus

rufus Pinto 1978
1978
Loc

Trogon rufus sulphureus

Gyldenstolpe 1951
1951
Loc

Trogon rufus

rufus Pinto 1950
1950
Loc

Trogon rufus amazonicus

Zimmer 1948
1948
Loc

Trogon rufus amazonicus

Pinto 1947
1947
Loc

Trogon rufus amazonicus

Todd 1943
1943
Loc

Trogon curucui sulphureus

Griscom & Greenway 1941
1941
Loc

Trogonurus rufus

Pinto 1938
1938
Loc

rufus

Pinto 1938
1938
Loc

rufus

Stone 1928
1928
Loc

Trogonurus rufus

Stone 1928
1928
Loc

Trogonurus curucui

Cory 1919
1919
Loc

curucui

Cory 1919
1919
Loc

Trogon rufus

Snethlage 1914
1914
Loc

curucui

Ridgway 1911
1911
Loc

Trogonurus curucui

Ridgway 1911
1911
Loc

Trogon rufus

rufus Hellmayr 1910
1910
Loc

Trogon atricollis

atricollis Hellmayr 1906
1906
Loc

Trogon atricollis (Race A)

Grant 1892
1892
Loc

Trogon atricollis

Pelzeln J 1868
1868
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF