Buthacus Occurring
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1206/0003-0090.450.1.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5479374 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0396327D-FF86-7E08-B0AE-6AB432436D7B |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Buthacus Occurring |
status |
|
Key to the Species of Buthacus Occurring View in CoL in the Levant
1. Metasomal segments IV, V and telson, intercarinal surfaces granular and matte (figs. 27A–C, 29C, E, G)........................................2
– Metasomal segments IV, V and telson, intercarinal surfaces smooth and glabrous (figs. 27D, 28, 29A, B, D, F, H).................................4
2. Pectinal tooth count>22 (♂, ♀; fig. 19C–F); metasomal segments, dorsosubmedian and dorsolateral carinae, and telson, ventral surface densely setose (figs. 23B, C, 25B, C, 29E, G); legs I and II, telotarsal ungues equal in length (fig. 22E, G)......................................3
– Pectinal tooth count ≤22 (♂, 18–22; ♀, 12–14; fig. 19A, B); metasomal segments, dorsosubmedian and dorsolateral carinae, and telson, ventral surface sparsely setose (figs. 23A, 25A, 29C); legs I and II, telotarsal ungues unequal in length (fig. 22C) ……………...................... B. arava View in CoL , sp. nov.
3. Metasomal segments II and III, ventrosubmedian and ventrolateral carinae, and V, ventrolateral carinae well developed, posterior processes greatly enlarged, lobate (figs. 25B, 27B)................ B. tadmorensis View in CoL , stat. rev.
– Metasomal segments II and III, ventrosubmedian and ventrolateral carinae, and V, ventrolateral carinae weakly developed, posterior processes slightly enlarged, spiniform (figs. 25C, 27C).......... B. yotvatensis View in CoL , stat. rev.
4. Pedipalp chela of adult ♂ narrow (fig. 44A, B), manus width:chela length, 19.4% (17.1%– 21.3%), resembling chela of adult ♀ (fig. 44C, D), 17% (15.6%–19.6%); chela movable finger, retrolateral accessory denticles usually absent (fig. 21E, F); metasomal segment V ventrolateral carinae, posterior spiniform granules uniformly small (fig. 26A) ..... ....................................... B. levyi View in CoL , sp. nov.
– Pedipalp chela of adult ♂ broad (figs. 32A, B, 41A, B, 47A, B), manus width:chela length, 27.1% (25.1%–28.9%) in B. amitaii View in CoL , sp. nov., 24.2% in B. leptochelys View in CoL , and 26.3% (22.3%–29.5%) in B. nitzani View in CoL , stat. nov., unlike chela of adult ♀ (figs. 32C, D, 41C, D, 47C, D), 19.3% (18–20.8), 16.7% (15.9%– 17.3%), 19.9% (18%–24.1%), respectively; chela movable finger, retrolateral accessory denticles usually present (fig. 21A, D, G); metasomal segment V ventrolateral carinae, posterior spiniform granules variable, some large (fig. 26B–D)..................................5
5. Total length> 59 mm; pedipalp chela of adult ♂ long (fig. 41A, B), e.g., manus length:movable finger length, 70.7%; pectinal tooth count>35 (32–39) in ♂,>27 (27–31) in ♀ .............................. B. leptochelys View in CoL
– Total length <59 mm; pedipalp chela of adult ♂ short (figs. 32A, B, 47A, B), manus length:movable finger length, 81.8% (72.7%– 88.3%) in B. amitaii View in CoL , sp. nov., and 84.4% (76.8%–92.4%) in B. nitzani View in CoL , stat. nov.; pectinal tooth count ≤35 (26–35) in ♂, ≤27 (20–27) in ♀ (fig. 20A–D)………………..6
6. Metasomal segments II and III, ventrosubmedian and ventrolateral carinae well developed, posterior granules slightly enlarged, spiniform; segment V ventrolateral carinae, posterior granules enlarged, lobate (figs. 28D, 26D)................... ........................................... B. amitaii View in CoL , sp. nov.
– Metasomal segments II and III, ventrosubmedian and ventrolateral carinae weakly developed, posterior granules similar to preceding granules; segment V ventrolateral carinae, posterior granules slightly enlarged, spiniform (figs. 28C, 26C).... ....................................... B. nitzani View in CoL , stat. nov.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.