Rhipicephalus australis Fuller, 1899
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5251.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3326BF76-A2FB-4244-BA4C-D0AF81F55637 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7718331 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03966A56-0F1A-C71A-BABF-8D21B446F859 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Rhipicephalus australis Fuller, 1899 |
status |
|
8. Rhipicephalus australis Fuller, 1899 View in CoL .
Australasian: 1) Australia, 2) Indonesia (east of Wallace’s Line), 3) New Caledonia, 4) Papua New Guinea, 5) Solomon Islands; Oriental: 1) Cambodia, 2) Indonesia (west of Wallace’s Line), 3) Malaysia, 4) Philippines; remote islands: 1) Pacific Ocean Island (central) of Tahiti ( Estrada-Peña et al. 2012, Petney et al. 2019).
Rhipicephalus australis was widely confused with Rhipicephalus microplus prior to its reinstatement by Estrada-Peña et al. (2012).
Barré & Uilenberg (2010) stated that Rhipicephalus microplus was introduced into the Solomon Islands with cattle imported from Australia, but the tick actually involved is here thought to be Rhipicephalus australis . The geographic distribution of Rhipicephalus australis is probably broader than currently recognized, since distributional data are limited, and our understanding of the range of this species is based on Estrada-Peña et al. (2012) and Petney et al. (2019).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |