Fimbristylis crosslandii Roalson, R.L.Barrett, & Larridon, 2019
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.399.2.6 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03977306-FFDA-FF87-FF34-4E60FBDE53D6 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Fimbristylis crosslandii Roalson, R.L.Barrett, & Larridon |
status |
nom. nov. |
Fimbristylis crosslandii Roalson, R.L.Barrett, & Larridon View in CoL , nom. nov.
Replaced name: Crosslandia setifolia W.Fitzg. (1906: 9) , non Fimbristylis setifolia Hochst. ex Richard (1850: 507) (= Bulbostylis atrosanguinea ( Boeckeler 1886: 276) Clarke (in Durand & Schinz 1894: 611)).
Type (lectotype here designated): AUSTRALIA. Western Australia: Goody Goody Well, 9 miles from Derby , April 1905, W. V. Fitzgerald 259 (lectotype: PERTH 01030485 About PERTH !; isolectotypes: BM 000990949 !, image!, BRI 340661 About BRI !, image!, NSW 426509 About NSW !, PERTH 01030493 About PERTH !) .
Notes: The name is usually ascribed to Fitzgerald (1918: 122); however, a brief but diagnostic description was published by Fitzgerald (1906: 9). The species is widespread from the Dampier Peninsula in Western Australia ( Kenneally et al. 1996: 204) to the Top End of the Northern Territory. A full description can be found in Rye (1992: 1041; as Crosslandia setifolia ). The epithet is based on the genus Crosslandia , which recognizes Charles Crossland, leader of the expedition on which this species was discovered ( Maslin & Cowan 1998).
We here designate PERTH 01030485 as lectotype as it has the largest number of fertile spikelets and an original specimen label in Fitzgerald’s hand. No specimens were cited by Fitzgerald (1906: 9) other than general reference to his own collections, so the lectotype is chosen from the collection cited by Fitzgerald (1918: 122). Fitzgerald’s primary set of specimens is held at PERTH, but distribution of duplicates was not consistent, so lectotypification is considered desirable, as discussed by Maslin and Cowan (1998).
This species is easy to recognize by its distinctive fertile spikelets held just above ground level in addition to the normal, aerial fertile spikelets ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ). This species was originally described as being monoecious, but it is now known to be variable and is partly hermaphroditic as is typical of Fimbristylis . The morphology of the nutlets is somewhat dimorphic between the two spikelet types ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ). While most basal spikelets appear sessile, occasionally the culm can elongate to hold them a few cm above ground level.
Fimbristylis crosslandii appears to be closely related to F. spiralis R.Br. (1810: 226) , which can also develop fertile spikelets at the base of the plant ( Clarke 2005), and is clearly congeneric.
W |
Naturhistorisches Museum Wien |
V |
Royal British Columbia Museum - Herbarium |
A |
Harvard University - Arnold Arboretum |
PERTH |
Western Australian Herbarium |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.