Dasytes Paykull
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1184/r1/6705962.v1 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0397A501-BF3E-B04C-FF29-399EA8DFF8C7 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Dasytes Paykull |
status |
|
Key to species of genus Dasytes Paykull
Dasytes has been divided into five subgenera (see Liberti 2004a); in Sardinia it is represented by 8 species belonging to the following subgenera: Dasytes , Hypodasytes and Mesodasytes .
Dasytes flavescens and D. pauperculus have possibly been improperly placed in Dasytes (Dasytes) , as this subgenus has been provisionally used as a “container” for species of doubtful affiliation (see Liberti 2004a).
1. Body colour yellow to brown (sometimes bicoloured yellow and brown) but never black; dull, with no metallic reflexions; antennal segments short and compressed (character more evident in females); sexual dimorphism reduced; length about 3 mm ............................................................................................................... D. (D.) flavescens
- Body colour black (excluding legs and antenna which can be yellowish or reddish in part); rather bright and, sometimes, with metallic reflexions; antennal segments longer than wide or, mainly in female, more or less squareshaped; evident sexual dimorphism (male with longer and thinner antenna and parallel body shape) ........................ 2
2. All antennal segments with long setae (character most evident in male); male with 5 th antennal segment long, subtrapezoidal; female elytral pubescence simple, only consisting of thin, pale and rather erect setae (no black, stiff ones); length: 3.0– 3.5 mm .............................................................................................................. D. (D.) pauperculus
- Only first 5–6 antennal segments with long setae; 5 th antennal segment of male either short or sub-triangular; female elytral pubescence double, consisting of both recumbent pubescence and black setae................................................ 3
3. Pronotum flattened and very transverse, about twice as wide as long; completely black (legs included). Body larger, of wider shape: length 4.5–5 mm ................................................................................................... D. (H.) coerulescens
- Pronotum normally convex, 1.0–1.5 times as wide as long. Legs and antenna may be yellow to reddish in part. Body smaller, of narrower shape: length 3.5–4.5 mm ............................................................................................................ 4
4. Female head, eye included, narrower than anterior edge of pronotum; eye small. Length 4–4.5 mm [the male of this species is unknown]. .................................................................................................................. D. (subgen.?). doderoi
- Female head, eye included, approximately as wide as anterior edge of pronotum, eye normal .................................. 5
5. Legs entirely black; antenna black apart from 2 nd segment (sometimes reddish). Length 3.5–4.5 mm ......................... ........................................................................................................................................................ D. (M.) aeneiventris
- Legs, and often also antenna, pale in part (yellowish or reddish) ................................................................................ 6
6. Femora and antenna entirely black; tibiae reddish or yellowish, pronotum heavily punctured and rather dull on disc. Length 3.5–4 mm ............................................................................................................................D. (M.) nigroaeneus
- Basal half of femora yellow; first 3–4 antennal segments yellow; tibiae yellow, pronotum smooth and bright on disc. Length 3–4 mm. Although very similar, these two species clearly differ in the shape of the aedeagus ( Figs 12–13 View FIGURES 12–19 ) ............................................................................................................................................................ D. (M.) croceipes ............................................................................................................................................................... D. (M.) iteratus
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.