Ninetis Simon, 1890

Huber, Bernhard A. & Meng, Guanliang, 2025, Like grains of sand: Ninetis spiders on the Arabian Peninsula (Araneae: Pholcidae), Zootaxa 5563 (1), pp. 290-335 : 296-307

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5563.1.19

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:89383401-F270-48CC-ABDF-0C5AC8B30C2D

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039987E9-FFA3-FFB0-70CD-FEBDFF49FC04

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Ninetis Simon, 1890
status

 

Genus Ninetis Simon, 1890 View in CoL

Ninetis Simon, 1890: 95 View in CoL ; type species: N. subtilissima Simon, 1890 View in CoL .

Myrmidonella Berland, 1920: 349 ; type species: Myrmidonella minuta Berland, 1920 .

Ninetis View in CoL — Simon 1893: 486. Huber 2000: 80 View Cited Treatment .

Diagnosis. Tiny (body length ~ 0.9–1.5 mm), short-legged, eight-eyed pholcids with globular abdomen ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 ). Most known species (except N. samail sp. nov.) with distinctive configuration of male genital bulb, with slender ventral process and partly membranous dorsal process, the latter carrying sperm duct (e.g., Figs 7F View FIGURE 7 , 14F View FIGURE 14 ). This bulb morphology is otherwise only found in Magana Huber, 2019 , which is distinguished by its unique curved procursus, and Nerudia Huber, 2000 , which is distinguished by longer legs (male tibia 1: 1.1–2.5, versus 0.40–0.84 in Ninetis ; tibia 1 L/d: 14–31, versus 8–15 in Ninetis ). Females of most species (except N. minuta , N. marnif sp. nov., N. samail sp. nov.) with median epigynal pocket ( Figs 10F View FIGURE 10 , 15E View FIGURE 15 , 16F View FIGURE 16 ; see also fig. 331 in Huber 2000; fig. 11 in Huber 2002; fig. 27 in Huber & El-Hennawy 2007); such pockets are otherwise not known in Ninetinae .

Note. In a previous diagnosis of Ninetis ( Huber 2000: 81) , the genus was thought to differ from Nerudia by the absence of stridulatory files on the male chelicerae. This is not the case. In both genera, males of most if not all species have stridulatory files; females do not.

Description

Male

MEASUREMENTS. Total body length ~0.9–1.3. Carapace width 0.38–0.56. Diameter PME 35–50 µm; diameter AME 15–30 µm. Tibia 1 length 0.40–0.84. Tibia 1 L/d: 8–15. Leg formula 4123. Diameters of leg femora (at half length) 80–90 µm, of leg tibiae 50–55 µm.

COLOUR (in ethanol). Prosoma and legs pale ochre-yellow to light brown, carapace without pattern, legs without darker rings; abdomen ochre-grey to light brown, monochromous or with indistinct internal marks.

BODY. Ocular area not or barely raised. Carapace without thoracic groove (e.g., Fig. 10A, B View FIGURE 10 ; see also Huber 2000: fig. 4). Clypeus either unmodified or rim more sclerotized than in female. Sternum approximately as wide as long, with or without pair of anterior humps near coxae 1 ( Fig. 24B View FIGURE 24 ). Abdomen globular. Gonopore either with four epiandrous spigots arranged in two pairs ( N. subtilissima , N. namibiae , N. toliara , N. amoud sp. nov.; Figs 10E View FIGURE 10 , 16E View FIGURE 16 ; see also Huber 2000: fig. 125) or without epiandrous spigots ( N. samail sp. nov., N. marnif sp. nov.; Figs 24E View FIGURE 24 , 31E View FIGURE 31 ) (in other species not examined). ALS with one strongly widened spigot, one long pointed spigot, and five cylindrical spigots, of which one is much wider than the others (cf. Figs 10G, H View FIGURE 10 , 16G, H View FIGURE 16 , 24G, H View FIGURE 24 , 31G, H View FIGURE 31 ; see also Huber 2000: fig. 152); PMS with two conical spigots ( Figs 10G View FIGURE 10 , 16G View FIGURE 16 , 24H View FIGURE 24 ); PLS without spigots ( Fig. 10G View FIGURE 10 ).

CHELICERAE. Chelicerae usually with pair of frontal apophyses ( Figs 7G–I View FIGURE 7 , 14G–I View FIGURE 14 , 22H–J View FIGURE 22 ), absent only in N. marnif sp. nov. ( Fig. 29G–I View FIGURE 29 ); usually with stridulatory files ( Figs 10C View FIGURE 10 , 16D View FIGURE 16 , 24C View FIGURE 24 , 31C, D View FIGURE 31 ) consisting of ~15–35 ridges, distances between ridges usually 1–2 µm, in N. samail sp. nov. wider (3 µm). In some species possibly without stridulatory ridges ( N. minuta , N. namibiae ; not examined with SEM). Fangs unmodified (cf. Fig. 16C View FIGURE 16 ).

PALPS. Palpal coxa unmodified. Trochanter without process or with short ventral protrusion. Femur in species with stridulatory ridges with prolateral stridulatory pick proximally (modified hair; Fig. 17E View FIGURE 17 ), distally slightly widened but usually without modification, only in N. amoud sp. nov. with ventral tubercles ( Figs 13 View FIGURE 13 , 17A View FIGURE 17 ). Femur-patella joints variably shifted towards prolateral side. Tibia roundish to oval, with two trichobothria. Tibia-tarsus joints variably shifted towards retrolateral side. Palpal tarsus with row of strong dorsal hairs ( Fig. 17F View FIGURE 17 ), with tarsal organ weakly to strongly raised ( Figs 11E View FIGURE 11 , 17F View FIGURE 17 , 25E View FIGURE 25 , 32C View FIGURE 32 ), diameter 4.6–6.7 µm, diameter of opening 0.8–1.1 µm. Procursus simple, in N. samail sp. nov. with unique strong spine (arrow in Fig. 22C View FIGURE 22 ). Genital bulb with two processes: relatively complex dorsal process consisting of membranous and sclerotized elements, presumably carrying sperm duct (confirmed in N. minuta : Huber 2000, fig. 321); and simple, pointed, and weakly sclerotized ventral process (e.g., Figs 7F View FIGURE 7 , 14F View FIGURE 14 ); in N. samail sp. nov. dorsal process with distinctive sclerite set with scales, and ventral process more complex and sclerotized ( Fig. 22F View FIGURE 22 ).

LEGS. Without spines and curved hairs. With slender metatarsal hairs (as first described in Huber et al. 2023a) on metatarsus 3 (only one in very proximal position) and metatarsus 4 (one to four, in proximal position) ( Figs 12A, B View FIGURE 12 , 18E, F View FIGURE 18 , 26E, F View FIGURE 26 , 32F–H View FIGURE 32 ). Sexually dimorphic short vertical hairs present on tibia 1 only or on tibiae 1 and 2 ( Figs 12D View FIGURE 12 , 18G, H View FIGURE 18 , 26C View FIGURE 26 , 32E View FIGURE 32 ), barely visible in dissecting microscope, length ~17–22 µm, diameter at basis ~1.0–1.2 µm. Chemoreceptive hairs similar in size (length ~12–14 µm) but wider (diameter at basis 1.4–1.6 µm) and with side branch ( Figs 12C View FIGURE 12 , 18D View FIGURE 18 ) and mostly near leg tips. Retrolateral trichobothrium of tibia 1 at 58–67% of tibia length. Prolateral trichobothrium absent on tibia 1, present on tibiae 2–4. Base of trichobothria evenly rounded, without proximal ridge ( Figs 11H View FIGURE 11 , 18B View FIGURE 18 , 26B View FIGURE 26 , 33H View FIGURE 33 ). Legs with roundish cuticular plates ( Figs 11F View FIGURE 11 , 18G, H View FIGURE 18 , 26C, D View FIGURE 26 ; diameter 4–7 µm) and rimmed pores ( Figs 11G View FIGURE 11 , 18C View FIGURE 18 , 26D View FIGURE 26 ; outer diameter 2.5–3.0 µm, diameter of opening 0.2–0.3 µm) apparently on all leg segments. Tarsus 1 with three to five pseudosegments, variably distinct. Leg tarsal organs capsulate ( Figs 12E, F View FIGURE 12 , 19A–C View FIGURE 19 , 27A–C View FIGURE 27 , 33A, B View FIGURE 33 ; diameter 2.5–4.5 µm, diameter of opening 0.6–1.0 µm), but tarsal organs of posterior legs (legs 3 and 4 or legs 4 only) apparently reduced and non-functional ( Figs 19D View FIGURE 19 , 27D View FIGURE 27 , 33C, D View FIGURE 33 ). Tarsus 4 with one comb-hair on prolateral side ( Figs 19H View FIGURE 19 , 27H View FIGURE 27 ). Main tarsal claws with ~10–13 teeth ( Figs 12G, H View FIGURE 12 , 19E–H View FIGURE 19 , 27E–H View FIGURE 27 , 33E–G View FIGURE 33 ). Claws of tarsus 4 slightly different from others (distal teeth more directed towards distal).

Female

In general, similar to males but sternum without anterior humps, chelicerae without stridulatory files ( Figs 10D View FIGURE 10 , 16B View FIGURE 16 , 24D View FIGURE 24 , 31B View FIGURE 31 ), clypeus without sclerotized rim, and palpal tarsal organ weakly raised ( Figs 18A View FIGURE 18 , 26A View FIGURE 26 , 32D View FIGURE 32 ) and slightly smaller (diameter 3.6–4.5 µm, diameter of opening 0.7–1.1 µm). Legs either shorter than in males (male / female tibia 1 length: ~1.0–1.3, but sample sizes mostly very small except in N. marnif sp. nov.: 1.10) or equal to slightly longer than in males (reasonable sample sizes only in N. subtilissima , N. amoud sp. nov., and N. samail sp. nov.: 0.95–0.98); tibia 1 length 0.36 – 0.83. Spinnerets, slender metatarsal hairs, chemoreceptive hairs, trichobothria, cuticular plates, rimmed pores, comb-hairs, leg tarsal organs, and claws as in male. Epigynum with simple semicircular to trapezoidal anterior plate, weakly protruding, in some species with distinct median pocket ( Figs 10F View FIGURE 10 , 15E View FIGURE 15 , 16F View FIGURE 16 ) (or glandular duct?—bottom of pocket not sclerotized and difficult to resolve); posterior plate short and simple. Internal genitalia ( Figs 8 View FIGURE 8 , 9 View FIGURE 9 , 15 View FIGURE 15 , 23 View FIGURE 23 , 30 View FIGURE 30 ) with pair of transversal posterior sclerites and complex median structures of unknown function, apparently without pore plates; in N. samail sp. nov. with pair of large membranous elements.

Distribution. Ninetis is widely distributed on the Arabian Peninsula and in Africa, including Madagascar ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 ). Specimens have been collected from sea level to 1700 m. On the Arabian Peninsula, we found Ninetis spiders at 23 of 68 localities visited in Oman and Saudi Arabia.

Previous publications have partly reported slightly erroneous coordinates. These are corrected here, as far as possible. Huber and El Hennawy (2007) reported N. minuta from “Tsavo West, Kisima forest”, giving 3.517 °S, 38.867 °E. The exact coordinates cannot be reconstructed but are probably near 3.4 °S, 38.4 °E (near Taita Discovery Center in the foothills of the Taita Hills; R. Jocqué pers. comm., 18 Apr. 2024). The type locality of N. russellsmithi ( Malawi, 12 km S of Monkey Bay) was published as ~ 14.05 °S, 35.00 °E ( Huber 2002) but should be ~ 14.16 °S, 34.93 °E. Ninetis toliara was reported from Madagascar, Isalo, with the coordinates 23.15 °S, 43.62 °E ( Huber & El Hennawy 2007); the correct coordinates are probably close to ~ 22.62 °N, 45.36 °E. Finally, there is a discrepancy in the literature concerning the locality Hossere Gare in Cameroon. Huber et al. (2014) used 8.50 °N, 13.13 °E (for N. faro ), while Logunov and Azarkina (2018) used 9.18 °N, 13.82 °E (for jumping spiders originating from the same collecting event). The precise coordinates are 8.502 °N, 13.138 °E (R. Jocqué pers. comm., 18 Apr. 2024).

Natural history. Ninetis spiders occupy a range of ground microhabitats in dry areas, such as leaf litter, dead branches and pieces of bark, and undersides of rocks ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 ). The majority of specimens reported herein were collected by turning rocks, both in shaded habitats and in habitats fully exposed to the sun. Upon disturbance, the spiders tended to run rapidly, eventually dropping to the ground. No webs were seen in the field, but in collection vials, the spiders quickly built tiny webs ( Fig. 20A View FIGURE 20 ; also reported in Huber & van Harten 2001). Egg sacs were flat, i.e. all eggs were arranged in a single layer, and usually contained five to seven eggs ( Fig. 20 View FIGURE 20 ); egg diameters ranged from 0.37 to 0.44 mm. For further data on individual species, see below.

Relationships. The molecular analysis of Eberle et al. (2018) suggested that Ninetis is sister to the Omani monotypic genus Magana Huber, 2019 (“Gen.n. Om6” in Eberle et al. 2018 and in Huber et al. 2018), and that these two genera are nested within a clade of South American Ninetinae . The closest relative of Ninetis and Magana among South American Ninetinae was the Brazilian monotypic genus Pinoquio Huber & Carvalho, 2022 (“Gen. n. Br15-159” in Eberle et al. 2018 and in Huber et al. 2018); sister to this clade was Nerudia + Gertschiola . UCE data (G. Meng, D. Dimitrov, B.A. Huber, L. Podsiadlowski, unpublished data) support these results from Sanger sequencing. These unpublished UCE data also include two of the newly described species below ( N. marnif sp. nov.; N. samail sp. nov.), and they support their assignment to Ninetis . This is in contrast to our NJ tree ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ), but this tree is not expected to reliably reflect phylogenetic relationships.

Relationships within Ninetis remain largely unstudied; no sequences are available for African and Malagasy taxa. Morphologically, the type species N. subtilissima appears much more similar to African and Malagasy taxa (and to the Saudi Arabian N. amoud sp. nov.) than to the two Omani species N. samail sp. nov. and N. marnif sp. nov.

Composition. The genus now includes nine described species. Females of two possible further species are available in collections: one female from Madagascar, Fianarantsoa, Ranomafana National Park , Talatakely (21.2633 °S, 47.41932 °E) in CAS GoogleMaps ; and one female from Saudi Arabia, Mecca, NE of Ghran (22.0488 °N, 39.4744 °E), in ZFMK GoogleMaps .

CAS

California Academy of Sciences

ZFMK

Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Araneae

Family

Pholcidae

Loc

Ninetis Simon, 1890

Huber, Bernhard A. & Meng, Guanliang 2025
2025
Loc

Myrmidonella

Berland, L. 1920: 349
1920
Loc

Ninetis

Huber, B. A. 2000: 80
Simon, E. 1893: 486
1893
Loc

Ninetis

Simon, E. 1890: 95
1890
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF