Philautus hosii ( Boulenger, 1895 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.26107/RBZ-2020-0025 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C9614B20-2C82-44BB-A1A2-C7A06352313B |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0399F748-6533-4A53-94CE-F8B8FDB95C7F |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Philautus hosii ( Boulenger, 1895 ) |
status |
|
Philautus hosii ( Boulenger, 1895) View in CoL
Rhacophorus hosii Boulenger, 1895: 169 .
Rhacophorus buergeri hosii Wolf, 1936: 170 .
Rhacophorus hosi Inger, 1954: 385 .
Rhacophorus hosei Inger, 1966: 304 .
Philautus hosei Liem, 1970: 68 View in CoL .
Philautus hosii Inger, 1985: 529 View in CoL .
Polypedates chlorophthalmus Das, 2005: 266 View in CoL View Cited Treatment . – new synonymy.
Description of ZRC 1.11531 (holotype of Polypedates chlorophthalmus Das, 2005 ). Character states in the original description (D) that differ from the results of the re-examination are given in square brackets.
Adult female ( Fig. 1 View Fig ); body large, SVL 59.9 mm [D: 62.1], body moderately slender with narrow waist, widest posterior to head; head large (HL/SVL 0.39), slightly longer than wide (HW/HL 0.93) [D: slightly broader than long (HW/HL 1.04)]; snout elongate and long (SL/HL 0.45), subacuminate in dorsal view, rounded in lateral view, slightly projecting beyond lower jaw [D: not exceeding level of mandible] in lateral view, wider than long (SL/EE 0.91) ( Fig. 2 View Fig ); canthus rostralis distinct, slightly concave ( Fig. 2 View Fig ); loreal region almost vertical, slightly concave ( Fig. 2 View Fig ); nostrils oval, directed anterolaterally, situated close to tip of snout (EN/NS 2.55, EN/SL 0.72 [D: 0.74]), separated from each other by distance much smaller than distance between eye and nostril (NN/EN 0.64 [D: 0.72]) ( Fig. 2 View Fig ); eyes directed anterolaterally, protruding, moderately large (ED/HL 0.31); pupil horizontal; eye diameter shorter than snout length (ED/ SL 0.70), and subequal to eye-to-nostril distance (ED/EN 0.98 [D: larger, ED/EN 1.07); interorbital distance slightly greater than upper eyelid (IO/EW 1.05 [D: interorbital distance greater than upper eyelid width, IO/EW 2.22]) and wider than internarial distance (IO/NN 1.38) ( Fig. 2 View Fig ); skin of forehead free, not co-ossified to nasal, sphenethmoid or frontoparietal elements of cranium; pineal ocellus present; tympanum distinct, oval, its vertical diameter greater than horizontal diameter, half diameter of eye (TD/ED 0.51), separated from eye by about half its diameter (ET/TD 0.54) ( Fig. 2 View Fig ); mouth extends to level of centre of tympanum [D: to posterior corner of eye]; upper jaw with dentition; teeth on premaxilla larger than those on maxilla; choanae elongate, located far anterolaterally at margins of roof of mouth ( Fig. 3 View Fig ); vomerine teeth in two highly elevated, large, broad, posteromedially directed ridges at anterior edge of choanae, separated from each other by about one-fourth length of individual ridge ( Fig. 3 View Fig ); mandibular symphysis weakly thickened to bony knob; tongue subtriangular, bifid apically, lacking median lingual process, free distally for about one-third its length.
Dorsal side of trunk, head, and limbs shagreened [D: dorsum, including upper eyelids and upper surfaces of limbs smooth] ( Fig. 1 View Fig ); supratympanic fold distinct, curved, running from posterior corner of eye to level of forelimb insertion ( Fig. 2 View Fig ); ventral side of head and limbs smooth, abdomen and postaxial sides of thighs areolate ( Fig. 1 View Fig ).
Forelimbs moderately thick [D: short and thick]; hand large (HND/SVL 0.34); fingers long and slender, lacking webbing ( Fig. 3 View Fig ); relative length of fingers: I <II <IV <III; tips of fingers enlarged into broad oval disks, each with circummarginal groove; subarticular tubercles prominent, rounded, numbering one on Fingers I and II, two on Fingers III and IV [D: one on first, second and fourth fingers, two on third finger] ( Fig. 3 View Fig ); proximal tubercles on Fingers III and IV smaller than distal tubercles and tubercles on Fingers I and II ( Fig. 3 View Fig ); thenar tubercle small, about one-third length of metacarpal of Finger I in palmar view, oval, low; inner and outer palmar tubercle subequal in shape and size to thenar tubercle, on proximal part of metacarpals of Fingers III and IV [D: palmar tubercles indistinct] ( Fig. 3 View Fig ); supernumerary small tubercles present on metacarpals.
Hindlimbs long and slender (LEG /SVL 1.96); tibiofibula long (TFL/SVL 0.62), longer than thigh (TFL/THL 1.10); heels without flap, fold, or calcar, overlapping each other considerably when knees flexed and thighs held perpendicularly to median plane [D: meeting each other and overlapping slightly]; foot large (FOT/SVL 0.52), shorter than tibiofibula (FOT/TFL 0.84); toes long and slender, relative length I <II <V <III <IV; tips of toes enlarged into broad oval disks, each with circummarginal groove, smaller than disks on fingers; subarticular tubercles well developed, rounded, prominent, numbering one on Toes I and II, two on Toes III and V, and three on Toe IV ( Fig. 3 View Fig ); distal subarticular tubercles on Toes III–V and tubercles on Toes I and II slightly larger than proximal tubercles on Toes III and V and penultimate tubercle on Toe IV ( Fig. 3 View Fig ); proximal tubercle on Toe IV smaller than all other subarticular tubercles and less distinct; pedal webbing formula I 1.5/2 II 1+/2+ III 1+/2+ IV 2/1+ V [D: I 2- /2 II 1+/2 III 1+/2 IV 2/1.25 V] ( Fig. 3 View Fig ); narrow dermal flap on postaxial side of Toe V from proximal end of metatarsus to disk; inner metatarsal tubercle very prominent and elongate, large, about length of Metatarsal I ( Fig. 3 View Fig ); outer metatarsal tubercle absent.
Colouration in preservative. Dorsum greyish light brown; large, dark grey, V-shaped pattern in scapular region; light brown labial region barred with darker spots; dorsal side of limbs light brown with faint dark crossbars; webbing pale
grey; ventral side of trunk and limbs cream-coloured; head, throat, and breast with marked medium brown mottling; abdomen with widely separated small brown dots; preaxial and postaxial sides of limbs with greyish brown mottling; digits of limbs yellowish grey.
We compared the female holotype of Polypedates chlorophthalmus (ZRC 1.11531) in detail to a female Philautus hosii (SMNS 13628), collected near Camp 5 in Gunung Mulu National Park, Sarawak, at ca. 100 m a.s.l. ( Figs. 1–3 View Fig View Fig View Fig ; Table 1). The two specimens are nearly identical in general appearance ( Fig. 1 View Fig ), shape of snout ( Fig. 2 View Fig ), hands and feet, extent of toe webbing ( Fig. 2 View Fig ), presence and shape of hand and foot tubercles ( Fig. 3 View Fig ), size and shape of vomerine teeth ( Fig. 3 View Fig ), dorsal and ventral colouration and pattern ( Fig. 1 View Fig ), and body proportions ( Table 1). We therefore conclude that the two specimens are conspecific. Iris colouration is variable in Philautus hosii and some recently collected specimens exhibit a greenish-coloured iris, instead of the more typical golden iris ( Fig. 4 View Fig ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Philautus hosii ( Boulenger, 1895 )
Dehling, J. Maximilian & Das, Indraneil 2020 |
Philautus hosii
Inger RF 1985: 529 |
Philautus hosei
Liem SS 1970: 68 |
Rhacophorus hosei
Inger RF 1966: 304 |
Rhacophorus hosi
Inger RF 1954: 385 |
Rhacophorus buergeri hosii
Wolf S 1936: 170 |
Rhacophorus hosii
Boulenger GA 1895: 169 |