Oxidus gracilis (C. L. Koch, 1847)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.10108462 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5475049 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039A820D-FF8C-FFDF-00D6-7EFBFFF8106B |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Oxidus gracilis (C. L. Koch, 1847) |
status |
|
Oxidus gracilis (C. L. Koch, 1847) View in CoL
Published records. None.
New localities. Windward Side, Ecolodge, M, 16 May 2006, D. Bass. Mt. Scenery Trail Trailhead (17.62873°N, 63.23748°W, +18’), 339–350m, 5m sampling extent, by hand at night with UV light, 7M, 6F, 11 March 2008, DS Sikes, JA Slowik, GD Alpert GoogleMaps ; Berlese of brushpile litter, 7M, FF, juvs., 12 March 2008, DS Sikes; and pitfall traps in ravine and by cliff in forest, 5M, 6F, 12–15 March 2008, J. Slowik. New Island Record .
Remarks. Though body forms are similar, females of these two paradoxosomatids can be reliably identified based on the midbody paranota, whose caudolateral margins are prolonged and acuminate in A. coarctata and flat, subcontinuous with the caudal metatergal margins, and apically blunt in O. gracilis ( Shelley and Lehtinen 1999, figs. 1, 4). This distinction holds for the midbody region only, around segments 9–13; the caudal paranota resemble each other with those of O. gracilis becoming progressively prolonged and acuminate caudally, particularly in Saban specimens.
UV |
Departamento de Biologia de la Universidad del Valle |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |