Sigalphinae, Haliday, 1833
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5722.1.6 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C04816CF-EEFA-405D-8F53-956C70C39742 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039AAA32-D233-FF88-C880-10E5FA2AF563 |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Sigalphinae |
| status |
|
Key to the tribes and subtribes of the subfamily Sigalphinae
1. Metasoma attached to propodeum much higher than base of hind coxa ( Figs 4A, B View FIGURE 4 ); propodeal bridge, sclerite separating the metasomal and coxal foramens on propodeum, present. Second radiomedial (submarginal) cell of fore wing short and relatively small ( Fig. 4G View FIGURE 4 ). Discoidal (discal) cell of fore wing short and wide ( Fig. 4G View FIGURE 4 ). Fossil (Baltic amber) ….. Acampsohelconini
– Metasoma attached to propodeum near level of base of hind coxa; propodeal bridge absent. Second radiomedial (submarginal) cell of fore wing long and relatively large. Discoidal (discal) cell of fore wing relatively long and narrow............... 2
2. Third metasomal tergite closed posteriorly and distinctly longer than second tergite. Second tergite deeply impressed anteriorly. Second and third tergites forming carapace covering posterior segments. Afrotropical, Nearctic, Oriental and Palaearctic regions.......................................................................... Sigalphini (Sigalphina)
– Third metasomal tergite open posteriorly, and medially not or only slightly longer than second tergite. Second tergite anteriorly at most with a pair of shallow depressions. Second and third tergites variable (forming or not forming carapace, and covering or not covering posterior segments)....................................................................... 4
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
