Carpelimus (Trogophloeus) moluccanensis Gildenkov, 1830
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.15298/rusentj.29.1.07 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C3FF46AA-3520-4716-995A-854BDC8DD953 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11093828 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039ABB25-A556-FFCF-FC53-FB6BB366B832 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Carpelimus (Trogophloeus) moluccanensis Gildenkov |
status |
sp. nov. |
Carpelimus (Trogophloeus) moluccanensis Gildenkov View in CoL , sp.n.
Figs 1 View Figs 1–3 , 7–9 View Figs 7–19 .
MATERIAL. Holotype, ♂ “ INDONESIA, N-Molucca isl. Halmahera , Central Weda Selatan distr. Loleo, S env., Tilopa vill. leg. D. Telnov & K. Greke ” “ 15–18 km SW, Oham, 13.–14. IX.2007, primary lowland forest, UV-Light 150 m, 0°14´46,74´´N 127°52´38,19´´E ” ( NKME) GoogleMaps . Paratypes: 4♂♂, 5♀♀, 9 ex. “ INDONESIA, N-Molucca isl. Halmahera , Central Weda Selatan distr. Loleo, S env., Tilopa vill. leg. D. Telnov & K. Greke ” “ 15–18 km SW, Oham, 13.–14. IX.2007, primary lowland forest, UV-Light 150 m, 0°14´46,74´´N 127°52´38,19´´E ” ( NKME; cMG — 1♂, 2 ex.) GoogleMaps ; 1♂ “ INDONESIA, N-Molucca isl. Halmahera , Central Weda Selatan distr. Loleo vill., S Tilope vill. leg. D. Telnov & K. Greke ” “ 15 km SW Oham, 190m 20.IX.2007, prim. Lowland forest, UV light, 0°14´46,74´´N 127°52´38,19´´E ” (cMG) GoogleMaps .
DESCRIPTION (holotype). Length 1.8 mm. Overall colouration brown. Entirely dark brown; legs and antennal bases yellow brown, antennae darkened toward apex to brown. Integument slightly shining, body with short, light-coloured hairs.
Head transverse, with a wide base, ratio of its length (from posterior margin of head to anterior margin of clypeus) to maximum width about 19:26. Neck constriction prominent. Eyes large, convex. Temples well-developed, round, eye diameter in dorsal view about 1.5 times as long as temple length. Head about as wide across eyes as across temples ( Fig. 1 View Figs 1–3 ). Head surface with delicate, fine and dense punctation. Puncture diameter about 1.5 times as small as eye facet. Distances between punctures significantly smaller than their diameter, interspaces smooth, slightly shining.Antennae rather long, antennal segments 1–3 elongated; segments 4–7 slightly elongated; segments 8–10 about as long as wide; segment 11 elongated, conical. Last 3 segments more massive than others and form loose club ( Fig. 1 View Figs 1–3 ).
Pronotum widest about 2/3 its length from base, then narrowed. Lateral margins straight from base, then smoothly rounded ( Fig. 1 View Figs 1–3 ). Ratio of pronotum length to its maximum width about 23:29. Surface of pronotum with delicate, fine and very dense punctation. Diameter of punctures about 1.5 times as small as eye facet. Distance between punctures significantly smaller than their diameter, punctures almost merging in central part of disc, interspaces smooth, slightly shining. Pronotal disc with a small, unpaired, oval depression along midline at apex and 2 pairs of distinct, symmetrical depressions: 1 pair of widely crescent-shaped depressions, separated by barely distinct medial ridge, near base and 1 pair in central part of disc, merging across midline to form a single butterfly-shaped depression ( Fig. 1 View Figs 1–3 ).
Ratio of length of elytra to their combined width about 33:37. Scutellum with weak oval depressions ( Fig. 1 View Figs 1–3 ). Surface of elytra with delicate, fine and dense punctation. Puncture diameter about 1.5 times as small as eye facet. Distances between punctures significantly smaller than their diameter, interspaces smooth, slightly shining, punctation similar to that on pronotum, but more uniform.
Abdomen delicately shagreened.
Aedeagus of characteristic structure ( Figs 7–8 View Figs 7–19 ).
Female. Sexual dimorphism absent, female morphologically similar to male.
Spermatheca of characteristic structure ( Fig. 9 View Figs 7–19 ).
COMPARATIVE REMARKS. The new species is similar in colouration, body morphology and microsculpture of integument [ Gildenkov, 2019a] to Carpelimus (Trogophloeus) notumus Gildenkov, 2019 and C. (T.) vilisus Gildenkov, 2019. It clearly differs in the structure of the aedeagus ( Figs 7–8 View Figs 7–19 ).
DISTRIBUTION. Indonesia, Maluku Islands.
ETYMOLOGY. Named for its geographical distribution.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |