Harpactea proxima Ferrández, 1990
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5263.3.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:20CB3CA0-BEF9-474C-8931-6A7948B9CA61 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7804310 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039CE028-E864-FFD6-FF12-FD2EFEDE62A3 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Harpactea proxima Ferrández, 1990 |
status |
|
Harpactea proxima Ferrández, 1990 View in CoL
( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 )
H. proxima Ferrández 1990: 33 View in CoL , fig. 1c–d (description based on ♁); Le Peru 2011: 277, fig. 436 (♁, redrawn from Ferrández 1990).
Material. Type material was not examined.
Diagnosis. Harpactea proxima is very similar to H. minoccii . According to Ferrández (1990) H. minoccii differs from H. proxima by absence of femoral spines. However, all our H. minoccii specimens possess femoral spines. Their absence is very unusual in the genus Harpactea in general, which lead us to conclude that the holotype of H. minoccii is just an individual with aberrant spination. Further, H. proxima possesses conductor (not embolus as stated in Ferrández (1990)) that is uniformly curved (in H. minoccii it is sinuous— Fig. 4E View FIGURE 4 ). Because we found only Harpactea with bulbus morphology of H. minoccii in the region from where H. proxima was described, we can not exclude the possibility that these two morphotypes are in fact the same species.
Ecology. So far unknown (cf. Ferrández 1990).
Distribution. It is recorded from southern Portugal (Ferrandez 1990: 37, fig. 3; Machado & Ferrandez 1991: 58, fig. 8).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Harpactea proxima Ferrández, 1990
Řezáč, Milan, Cardoso, Pedro & Řezáčová, Veronika 2023 |
H. proxima Ferrández 1990: 33
Le Peru, B. 2011: 277 |