Leucosolenia sp. A

Lavrov, Andrey, Ekimova, Irina, Schepetov, Dimitry, Koinova, Alexandra & Ereskovsky, Alexander, 2024, The complex case of the calcareous sponge Leucosolenia complicata % Porifera: Calcarea): hidden diversity in Boreal and Arctic regions with description of a new species, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 200, pp. 876-914 : 900

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlad104

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11265507

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039D223D-FFB8-FFEA-FEEC-FC7666E2F84A

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Leucosolenia sp. A
status

 

Leucosolenia sp. A View in CoL

( Figs 17 View Figure 17 , 18 View Figure 18 ; Table 7)

Material studied: Three specimens. Molecular data— three specimens %WS11692* WS11752* WS11770)* external morphology— three specimens %WS11692* WS11752* WS11770) * skeleton organization— two specimens %WS11752* WS11770)* spicules %SEM)— two specimens %WS11692* WS11770) %Supporting Information* Table S1).

External morphology: Studied specimens small in size. Length of cormus up to 1 cm. Cormus represented by compact reticulation of tubes* from which several oscular tubes arising. Oscular tubes erect and almost straight. Surface minutely hispid. Coloration of living and preserved specimens greyish white % Fig. 17A View Figure 17 ).

Spicules: Diactines % Fig. 18 View Figure 18 A-C). Two populations: %i) curved* spiny* lanceolate diactines % Fig. 18B View Figure 18 )* mean length 189.1 µm* mean width 7.2 µm % Table 7)* small* from almost straight to slightly curved and undulating* with lanceolate and spiny outer tip* spines in distinct rows % Fig. 18C View Figure 18 ); %ii) curved* smooth diactines % Fig. 18A View Figure 18 )* mean length 515.0 µm* mean width 11.6 µm % Table 7)* rare* long* slightly curved* without spines and lanceolate tips % Fig. 18C View Figure 18 ).

Triactines % Fig. 18D View Figure 18 * E). Predominantly T-shaped* sagittal %mean angle 146.5°) % Table 7). Unpaired actines variable in size: equal to* shorter* or longer than paired actines* but shorter unpaired actines most common %mean length: 118.5 µm—unpaired* 125.1 µm—paired) % Table 7). Both straight and bent paired actines common. Abnormal triactines in high numbers % Fig. 18E View Figure 18 )* sometimes with undulated actines. Unpaired actines usually slightly slender than paired %mean width: 11.1 µm—unpaired* 11.6 µm—paired) % Table 7).

Tetractines % Fig. 18F View Figure 18 ). Quite rare. Predominantly T-shaped %mean angle 140.8°) % Table 7)* variable in size. Unpaired actines equal to paired ones %mean length: 114.3 µm—unpaired* 113.2 µm—paired* 30.0 µm—apical) % Table 7). Unpaired actines straight* paired actines straight or undulating* apical actines curved or undulating* smooth. Paired and unpaired actines equal in width* apical actine more slender %mean width: 8.6 µm—unpaired* 8.5 µm—paired* 7.1 µm—apical) % Table 7).

Skeleton : Skeleton of both oscular rim and cormus tubes predominantly formed by triactines* tetractines rare % Fig. 17C View Figure 17 * D). In oscular tubes* spicules constitute organized array with their unpaired actines directed toward cormus and oriented more or less in parallel to proximo-distal axis of oscular tube % Fig. 17C View Figure 17 ). In cormus tubes spicule array completely disordered % Fig. 17D View Figure 17 ). Prominent oscular crown absent % Fig. 17B View Figure 17 ). Both populations of diactines cover tubes’ surface* orienting in different directions and extending outside.

Cytology: No material was available for cytological studies.

Distribution: Arctic species. Molecular identity confirmed only for the White Sea and Greenland. Found subtidal up to 15 m on rocks and red algae.

Reproduction: No data about reproduction time for this species.

Remarks: Although both our species’ delimitation analysis based on the H3 dataset and morphological data suggest that this species represents a distinct species-level unit* we avoid describing a new species as this case requires additional studies for several reasons. Leucosolenia sp. A shares some features with Leucosolenia corallorrhiza : %i) the external appearance is similar* %ii) the angle between unpaired actines in tri- and tetractines is similar %the mean angle is 142.9° in L. corallorrhiza and 146.5° in Leucosolenia sp. A )* and %iii) the unpaired actines in tri- and tetractines are commonly shorter than the paired ones.

However* these two species show several differences. Firstly* Leucosolenia sp. A has two populations of diactines* the smaller with lanceolate tips and the rare* large* curved* smooth* non-lanceolate diactines* whereas in L. corallorrhiza only the first type is present. Also* the tetractines are rare in both the cormus and oscular regions of Leucosolenia sp. A * while they are commonly present in the osculum of L. corallorrhiza . Leucosolenia sp. A commonly has triactines with bent* unpaired actines* which are straight in L. corallorrhiza . Finally* the mean length of actines in tri- and tetractines of L. corallorrhiza is shorter than those of Leucosolenia sp. A % L. corallorrhiza : 70.5 µm—unpaired actines mean length* 82.7 µm—paired actine mean length; Leucosolenia sp. A : 118.5 µm—unpaired mean length* 125.1 µm—paired mean length). At the same time* the limited material of Leucosolenia sp. A %only three specimens were collected and studied) does not allow us to study the possible interspecific variation and ontogenetic variation. Therefore* we avoid the designation of this species as a distinct one* until more material would be available for study.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Porifera

Class

Calcarea

SubClass

Calcaronea

Order

Leucosolenida

Family

Leucosoleniidae

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF