Afrus, Janák, Jiří & Bordoni, Arnaldo, 2015
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4038.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1B62B78C-AA59-4417-A4FC-1CC9CED745E0 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6101599 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039D87F5-553E-FFC7-FF4A-F928FCDFB8BD |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Afrus |
status |
gen. nov. |
Afrus View in CoL gen. nov.
Type species: Thyreocephalus spegazzinii Bernhauer, 1915
Description. Form elongate, stout, of medium size (6.5–10 mm).
Head variably punctate, punctures not forming semi-impressed rows of coalescent grooves, frontal grooves short or moderately long, ocular grooves inconspicuous or absent ( Figs. 3, 5 View FIGURES 3 – 7. 3, 4 ). Anterior margin of frons between antennal insertions extended into short and very wide, apically sligthly rounded process, limited at each side by rounded emargination, and slightly impressed dorsally. Eyes small, head with large impression behind the eyes, temples longer than length of eyes seen from above, evenly rounded, laterally with evident subelliptical groove ( Figs. 4, 7 View FIGURES 3 – 7. 3, 4 ). Antennae geniculate, moderately short, antennal insertions separated from each other by distance about equal to distance separating each insertion from anteromedian margin of eye ( Figs. 3, 5 View FIGURES 3 – 7. 3, 4 ), first segment long, thickened towards apex, equal in length to at least the four following segments combined, second segment shorter than third, distal segments more or less transverse ( Figs. 1, 2 View FIGURES 1 – 2. 1 ). Labrum completely chitinised, short, transverse, lobate apically, with long and strong apical setae ( Figs. 10 View FIGURES 9 – 15 , 17 View FIGURES 16 – 21 ). Mandible stout, lateral furrow reduced to vague impression at base ( Figs. 3–5, 7 View FIGURES 3 – 7. 3, 4 ). Maxillary palpi moderately long, segment 3 shorter than segment 2, segment 4 longer and somewhat narrower than segment 3, subacute apically ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 3 – 7. 3, 4 ). Labial palpi moderately long, last segment distinctly longer than segment 2. Mentum short, transverse, pentagonal. Ligula divided. Gula very short, gular sutures contiguous.
Pronotum without dorsal rows of punctures, with one big puncture (without seta) close to anterior angles ( Figs. 1–3, 5 View FIGURES 1 – 2. 1 View FIGURES 3 – 7. 3, 4 ); antersternal plate with a suture (similar as in Fig. 26 View FIGURES 24 – 28. 24 ); both superior and inferior line of pronotal hypomera strongly developed, superior line turning downwards well before middle, joining or almost joining inferior line next to front margin of procoxae and continuing onto front margin of pronotum ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 3 – 7. 3, 4 ). Prosternum elevated medioposteriorly (similar as in Fig. 26 View FIGURES 24 – 28. 24 ), without posteromedian carina, intercoxal process protruding, triangular; epimera present. Mesosternum very short, transverse, widely separating middle coxae. Metasternum very long.
Elytra overlapping at suture ( Figs. 1, 2 View FIGURES 1 – 2. 1 ). Legs moderately long; protarsi simple (not dilated) in either sex, first four segments gradually becoming shorter, last segment about as long as three preceding segments combined; protibiae with numerous strong spines on outer margin; mesotibiae strongly spinose, with only apical ctenidium; first segment of mesotarsus and metatarsus about equally long as second, last segment about as long as preceding three segments combined; metatibiae spinose on outer margin, with only apical ctenidium ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 9 – 15 ).
Abdomen ( Fig. 1, 2 View FIGURES 1 – 2. 1 ) ‘Staphylininae-shaped’ with fourth or fifth segment broadest. Tergite 7 with complete membranous palisade fringe at its posterior margin ( Figs. 1, 2 View FIGURES 1 – 2. 1 ).
Male. Tergite and sternite 8 of male simple, not modified. Tergite 10 of male genital segment rather narrowly exposed between sclerites of tergite 9, strongly narrowed proximally ( Figs. 11 View FIGURES 9 – 15 , 18 View FIGURES 16 – 21 ), sclerites of tergite 9 contiguous mediobasally. Sternite 9 of male genital segment asymmetrical ( Figs. 12 View FIGURES 9 – 15 , 19 View FIGURES 16 – 21 ), located centrally. Aedeagus with basal bulbus subovoid, short median lobe, symmetrical parameres and inner sac with shape of variably long and wide ribbon with scales of different size ( Figs. 13 View FIGURES 9 – 15 , 20 View FIGURES 16 – 21 ).
Female. Genital segment with sternite proportionally short and two supplementary sclerites that cover its proximal part ( Figs. 14 View FIGURES 9 – 15 , 21 View FIGURES 16 – 21 ).
Differential diagnosis. This genus differs from other genera of Xantholinini that lack dorsal rows of punctures on the pronotum in combination of the following characters:
1) superior line turning downwards well before middle, joining or almost joining inferior line next to front margin of procoxae and continuing onto front margin of pronotum ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 3 – 7. 3, 4 )
2) head with large impression behind the eyes, lateral part of temple with evident subelliptical groove ( Figs. 3– 5, 7 View FIGURES 3 – 7. 3, 4 )
3) metatibia with only apical ctenidium which extends onto inner margin backwards to about middle ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 9 – 15 ).
The sister group of Afrus gen. nov. could be Thyreocephalus , which is supported by the following two characters: superior line turning downwards well before middle, joining or almost joining inferior line next to front margin of procoxae and continuing onto front margin of pronotum ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 3 – 7. 3, 4 ) and metatibia with only apical ctenidium which extends onto inner margin backwards to about middle ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 9 – 15 ), but this genus differs from Afrus by the absence of a subelliptical groove on the lateral parts of the temple and the presence of a subapical ctenidium ( Figs. 27, 28 View FIGURES 24 – 28. 24 ). The two hitherto known species of Afrus are also smaller (6.5–10 mm) than Thyreocephalus species from Africa south of the Sahara (body length 10–35 mm).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |