CHEIRACANTHIDAE Berg, 1940
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.26879/1035 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039D87FE-FFDB-FFAC-32F8-2D8BFD9DFAC1 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
CHEIRACANTHIDAE Berg, 1940 |
status |
|
Family CHEIRACANTHIDAE Berg, 1940
Diagnosis. Acanthodiforms with a short branchial region completely covered by slender branchiostegal rays; jaw cartilages formed of a single mineralisation composed of calcified cartilage blocks; palatoquadrate with median fenestra; mandibular splints absent; 4-6 sclerotic bones; multicuspid denticles/gill rakers on some of the branchial arches; high slender scapular shaft; ossified coracoid and procoracoid; in spines with smooth rounded leading edge ridge separated by groove from smooth or ridged lateral surfaces; dorsal spine with mineralised basal cartilage; no prepelvic or admedian fin spines; polygonal tesserae on cranial roof; ornamented scale crowns.
Remarks. Denison (1979) assigned all acanthodiforms to the one family Acanthodidae , following the suggestion by Miles (1966) that the previous division of the group into the Mesacanthidae , Cheiracanthidae , and Acanthodidae represented a grade, rather than clade, classification. Our observations show that the endoskeletal tissue structure in the Cheiracanthidae (i.e., Cheiracanthus and Homalacanthus , excluding Protogonacanthus ), and their ornamented rather than smooth scales, indicate this family is not intermediate between the Mesacanthidae and Acanthodidae and should be considered a legitimate clade.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.