Hybotidae, Macquart, 1827

Sinclair, Bradley J. & Cumming, Jeffrey M., 2006, The morphology, higher-level phylogeny and classification of the Empidoidea (Diptera), Zootaxa 1180 (1), pp. 1-172 : 1-172

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.1180.1.1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5059460

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039E87BE-FB1B-B252-F11F-FBF54EDAFD32

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Hybotidae
status

 

Hybotidae View in CoL View at ENA

Hybotinae Meigen, 1820 View in CoL : x. Type genus Hybos Meigen, 1803 View in CoL .

Hybotidae Macquart, 1827: 136 View in CoL .

This family has long been recognized and for many years has been formally used in publications, especially by European workers. Its monophyly is not in doubt, characterized by the presence of a palpifer, fore tibial gland, gonocoxal apodeme restricted to anterolateral margin of hypandrium (lacking process), apex of antenna often with long, slender seta­like receptor, laterotergite bare and R 4+5 unbranched. This family is divided into the following subfamilies and unplaced genera:

Incertae sedis within Hybotidae

Stuckenbergomyia Smith View in CoL —This genus was originally assigned to the Ocydromiinae ( Smith 1969) View in CoL , but its placement remains in doubt. There are four known species confined to southern Africa ( Sinclair 2003b).

Trichininae View in CoL rev. stat.

Trichinini Chvála, 1983: 112 , 114. Type genus Trichina Meigen, 1830 View in CoL .

The subfamily Trichininae View in CoL is here tentatively redefined to include only two genera,

Trichina Meigen and Trichinomyia Tuomikoski. These genera are grouped together mostly

for convenience and it is hoped that future analyses will resolve their assignment within the Hybotidae . This subfamily is distinguished from the remaining Hybotidae mostly on the basis of symplesiomorphies: dichoptic females, antennal style about half as long or shorter than the postpedicel, cell dm emitting three veins, proboscis short and directed downwards, ventral apodeme (see discussion under character 99) and postgonites absent.

Ocydromiinae

Ocydrominae Schiner, 1862 : lii, liii. Type genus Ocydromia Meigen, 1820 View in CoL .

Ocydromiinae Melander, 1908: 222 View in CoL .

This redefined lineage follows the definition of Sinclair & Cumming (2000), distinguished

by the following characters: short cell cu p with truncate apex, arista subapical or much

longer than postpedicel, proboscis short and directed downwards or recurved, 2–3 veins

emitted from cell dm, male terminalia asymmetrical and rotated through 90°, phallus

biarticulated, ventral apodeme and postgonites absent and epandrium with pair of

articulated surstyli. The Ocydromiinae is here restricted to include the following genera:

Abocciputa Plant , Apterodromia Oldroyd , Austropeza Plant , Chvalaea Papp & Földvári ,

Hoplopeza Bezzi , Leptodromia Sinclair & Cumming , Leptodromiella Tuomikoski ,

Leptopeza Macquart , Leptopezella Sinclair & Cumming , Neotrichina Sinclair &

Cumming, Ocydromia Meigen , Oropezella Collin , Pseudoscelolabes Collin , Scelolabes

Philippi, and Stylocydromia Saigusa ( Tuomikoski 1966; Chvála 1983; Saigusa 1986; Plant

1989; Sinclair & Cumming 2000; Papp & Földvári 2001).

Oedaleinae rev. stat.

Oedaleini Chvála, 1983: 112 , 162. Type genus Oedalea Meigen, 1820 View in CoL .

In this lineage the female cercus is fused to tergite 10, female segment 8 is elongate, the

apical antennal style is often greatly shortened (shorter than postpedicel), mouthparts

directed obliquely forwards, cell cu p truncate apically and three veins emitted from cell

dm ( Tuomikoski 1966; Chvála 1983). The Oedaleinae include the following genera:

Allanthalia Melander , Anthalia Zetterstedt , Euthyneura Macquart and Oedalea ( Chvála

1983; Chvála & Kovalev 1989).

Tachydromiinae

Tachydromiae Meigen, 1822: vii. Type genus Tachydromia Meigen, 1803 .

This distinctive subfamily is generally characterized by the apomorphic loss of M 2 and cell dm (due to the loss of dm­cu crossvein), but the subfamily also lacks the wing pterostigma and pseudotracheae, as well as possessing secondary modifications of the hybotid male genitalic ground plan (i.e., phallus with simple apex and the ejaculatory apodeme not fused to phallus base). The subfamily is divided into three tribes, namely the new tribe Symballophthalmini , and the Tachydromiini and Drapetini ( Chvála 1975; Cumming 1990; Cumming unpubl. data).

Symballophthalmini n. tribe

Type genus Symballophthalmus Becker, 1889 .

This new tribe includes the single genus Symballophthalmus Becker , formerly assigned to

the Tachydromiini . It is a distinctive group (defined on the basis of apically broadened

apomorphic wings) that retains numerous plesiomorphies (e.g., holoptic males), which

exclude it from the other two tribes.

Tachydromiini

In its new restricted sense, the Tachydromiini is defined by the following apomorphies: presence of a precoxal bridge and a weakened A 1. The tribe includes the following genera: Ariasella Gil , Charadrodromia Melander , Dysaletria Loew , Pieltainia Arias , Platypalpus Macquart , Tachydromia Meigen , Tachyempis Melander , and Tachypeza Meigen ( Chvála & Kovalev 1989; Cumming 1990).

Drapetini

Drapetini Collin, 1961: 26 View in CoL . Type genus Drapetis Meigen, 1822 View in CoL .

This tribe is diagnosed by the following apomorphies: eyes with ommatrichia, loss of CuA 1 and loss of tergite 10 in females (correlated with sternite 10 positioned below the cerci) ( Cumming & Cooper 1992; Solórzano Kraemer et al. 2005; Cumming unpubl. data). The Drapetini View in CoL includes the following genera: Allodromia Smith View in CoL , Atodrapetis Plant View in CoL , Austrodrapetis Smith View in CoL , Austrodromia Collin View in CoL Chaetodromia Chillcott View in CoL , Chersodromia Walker View in CoL , Crossopalpus Bigot View in CoL , Dusmetina Gil View in CoL , Drapetis Meigen View in CoL , Elaphropeza Macquart View in CoL , Isodrapetis Collin View in CoL , Megagrapha Melander View in CoL , Micrempis Melander View in CoL , Nanodromia Grootaert View in CoL , Ngaheremyia Plant & Didham View in CoL , Pontodromia Grootaert View in CoL , Sinodrapetis Yang, Gaimari & Grootaert View in CoL , and Stilpon Loew View in CoL ( Chvála & Kovalev 1989; Cumming 1990; Cumming & Cooper 1992; Grootaert 1994; Plant 1997; Yang et al. 2004; Plant & Didham 2006).

Hybotinae

Hybotinae Meigen, 1820 View in CoL : x. Type genus Hybos Meigen, 1803 View in CoL .

This subfamily has been expanded to include the Bicellaria View in CoL group of genera as suggested

by Sinclair & Cumming (2000). The Hybotinae are characterized by holoptic females

(except Lamachella and Leptocrytoma), proboscis often heavily sclerotized and projecting

obliquely or horizontally forwards, wings generally with well developed anal lobe, cell dm

emitting two veins and prosternum isolated and separated from proepisternum ( Smith

1969; Chvála 1983; Sinclair 1996). This subfamily is divided into two tribes:

Bicellariini n. tribe

Type genus Bicellaria Macquart, 1823 .

The Bicellariini is a distinctive group, defined on the basis of their unique wing venation:

cell dm absent and the branches of Mevanescent near mid wing (bases of veins

abbreviated). This new tribe includes three genera formerly assigned to the Ocydromiinae :

Bicellaria Macquart , Hoplocyrtoma Melander , Leptocyrtoma Saigusa.

Hybotini

This tribe is defined on a suite of characters including: cell dm emitting two veins, cell cu p often as long as or longer than cell bm, wing usually broad with developed anal lobe and hind femur often enlarged with long setae beneath. The genera of the Hybotini were divided into several groups by Sinclair (1996). The following genera are included in the Hybotinae : Acarterus Loew , Afrohybos Smith , Chillcottomyia Saigusa, Ceratohybos Bezzi , Euhybus Coquillett , Hybos Meigen , Lactistomyia Melander , Lamachella Melander , Neohybos Ale­Rocha & Carvalho , Parahybos Kertész , Smithybos Ale­Rocha , Stenoproctus Loew , Syndyas Loew , and Syneches Walker ( Smith 1967, 1975, 1980; Saigusa 1986; Ale­Rocha 2000; Ale­Rocha & Carvalho 2003).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Diptera

Family

Hybotidae

Loc

Hybotidae

Sinclair, Bradley J. & Cumming, Jeffrey M. 2006
2006
Loc

Trichinini Chvála, 1983: 112

Chvala, M. 1983: 112
1983
Loc

Oedaleini Chvála, 1983: 112

Chvala, M. 1983: 112
1983
Loc

Drapetini

Collin, J. E. 1961: 26
1961
Loc

Ocydromiinae

Melander, A. L. 1908: 222
1908
Loc

Hybotidae

Macquart, J. 1827: 136
1827
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF