Site
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jcz.2022.05.002 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2B1478CC-D510-4637-A784-D5283821EF7D |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039EC10C-5B0D-FFFC-FF05-D28AFBC1FDA1 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Site |
status |
|
Site of infection: Spiral intestine.
Voucher material: 20 vouchers MACN-Pa No. 737/1–10, 738, 739, 740/1–8 (17 whole mature worms, and histological sections of 1 mature proglottid and 2 scoleces).
Prevalence of infection: 80% (8 hosts infected out of 10 examined).
3.2.3. Remarks
The newly collected specimens of E. multiloculatum allowed for an emended description of the species, including the modification of length ranges of some structures (i.e., bothridia, anteriormost loculus, testes, cirrus sac, ovarian poral and aporal lobe), width ranges of other structures (i.e., neck, myzorynchus and cirrus sac), and genital pore position. The emended description also includes information omitted in the original description and redescription on the length of some structures (i.e., posteriormost loculus, velum of subterminal proglottid and vitelline follicles), width of other structures (i.e., posteriormost loculus and vitelline follicles), number of immature and mature proglottids, disposition of musculature in bothridial septa, percentage of the terminal proglottid covered by the velum, width to length ratio of the terminal proglottid, location of the vas deferens entrance into the cirrus sac, diameter and position of Mehlis’ glands, disposition of vitelline follicles within each lateral band, presence of osmoregulatory ducts, and the pattern of microtriches on neck and mature proglottid surfaces ( Table 4).
The emended description agrees with the original description by Carvajal & Dailey (1975) and disagrees with the redescription by Bueno & Caira (2017) in that there is no apical sucker on the distal bothridial surface. The corresponding structure is considered as an anteriormost loculus rather than an apical sucker because it shows a straight posterior margin rather than a rounded posterior margin ( Fig. 8A View Fig of the present study and Fig. 7 View Fig of Bueno & Caira 2017), which is the feature proposed by Caira et al. (1999) and Caira & Jensen (2021) to differentiate both structures. In addition, the emended description is consistent with that by Carvajal & Dailey (1975), but not with that by Bueno & Caira (2017), in that there is a medial longitudinal septum in bothridia, as demonstrated in histological sections of bothridial musculature ( Fig. 5D View Fig of the present study). Finally, and contrary to the redescription by Bueno & Caira (2017), we failed to observe any kind of interruption of vitelline follicles at the cirrus sac or ovary level and we detected intraspecific variability in ovarian symmetry.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.