Hyadina, Haliday in Curtis, 1837

Mathis, Wayne N. & Zatwarnicki, Tadeusz, 2019, Revision of the Shore-fly Genera Parahyadina Tonnoir and Malloch and New Zealand Hyadina Haliday (Diptera: Ephydridae), Zootaxa 4623 (3), pp. 401-440 : 409

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4623.3.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6C8F0D4B-1830-4B87-ACA4-824C356FDA91

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A08710-6826-FFFC-46EA-FD0FE6CB4CBC

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Hyadina
status

 

Key to Species of Hyadina View in CoL View at ENA and Parahyadina

1. Lateroclinate fronto-orbital seta weakly developed, basal diameter much reduced in comparison to basal diameters of vertical setae............................................................................................... 2

- Lateroclinate fronto-orbital seta well developed, basal diameter comparable or only slightly reduced in comparison to basal diameters of vertical setae.............................................................................. 3

2. Dorsocentral postsutural seta 1 with several dorsocentral setulae; male tergites 3–5 with ventrolateral margin shallowly and bluntly rounded.......................................................................... H. breva , sp. nov.

- Dorsocentral postsutural setae 2 with several dorsocentral setulae; male tergites 3–5 with anterior margin extended ventrolaterally as a pointed, well-sclerotized process.................................................. P. edmistoni , sp. nov.

3. Costal section II equal in length or longer than costal section III................................................ 4

- Costal section II shorter than costal section III.............................................................. 8

4. Wings amber......................................................................................... 5

- Wings hyaline........................................................................................ 6

5. Aedeagus in lateral view sickle shaped ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 13–16 ); hypandrial-gonal structure longer than wide in ventral view ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 13–16 ), apical extensions of gonites digitiform.............................................................. P. atra , sp. nov.

- Aedeagus in lateral view more or less rectangular ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 7–10 ); hypandrial-gonal structure wider than long in ventral view ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 7–10 ), apical extensions irregularly bifurcate...................................................... P. angusta , sp. nov.

6. Surstylar midheight bearing 5–6 setulae; aedeagus in lateral view shoe-like with tapered and narrow “toe”; gonite in lateral view ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 19–22 ) relatively narrow, straight throughout length.................................... P. bifurcata , sp. nov.

- Surstylar midheight bearing 2 setulae; aedeagus in lateral view more or less rectangular; gonite in lateral view L-shaped, apical portion more robust ( Fig. 52 View FIGURES 49–52 )............................................................................ 7

7. Shape of hypandrium-gonite in ventral view ( Fig. 51 View FIGURES 49–52 ) more or less quadrate with corners extended as thumb-like process posteriorly and as shallowly bifurcate, broad process anterolaterally, anterior margin concave....................................................................................................... P. lacustris Tonnoir and Malloch View in CoL

- Shape of hypandrium-gonite in ventral view ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 23–26 ) tubular with lateral extension at 90° angle and with paired apical, digitiform extensions medially that bear 2 apical tubercles (Chatham Islands).............................. P. bulla , sp. nov.

8. Male tergites 3–5 with anterior margin extended ventrolaterally as a pointed, well-sclerotized process; male tergite 5 tucked obliquely ventrad from plane of tergite 4................................................... P. edmistoni , sp. nov.

- Male tergites 3–5 with ventrolateral margin shallowly and bluntly rounded; male tergite 5 extended posteriorly in same plane as tergite 4........................................................................................... 9

9. Postsutural scutum without distinct, longitudinal vittae between acrostichal setae and dorsocentral setae; fronto-orbital setae and lateral vertical seta identical in length and basal width. Surstylus conspicuously tapered, apex narrowly rounded............................................................................................. P. irwini , sp. nov.

- Postsutural scutum with distinct, longitudinal vittae in rows between acrostichal setae and dorsocentral setae............ 10

10. Fronto-orbital seta subequal in length to lateral vertical seta. Surstylus in posterior view ( Fig. 39 View FIGURES 39–42 ) tapered to narrowly rounded apex................................................................................. P. hennigi , sp. nov.

- Fronto-orbital setae shorter than lateral vertical seta. Surstylus in posterior view ( Figs. 29 View FIGURES 29–32 , 55 View FIGURES 55–58 ) somewhat rectangular with apex very shallowly bilobed................................................................................ 11

11. Medial and lateral lobes of surstylar apex about equal in length (best seen in posterior view); gonite in ventral view ( Fig. 57 View FIGURES 55–58 ) with large, tapered, lateral process......................................................... P. latistylis , sp. nov.

- Lateral lobe of shallow surstylar bifurcation longer than medial lobe or angle; gonite in ventral view ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 19–22 ) with ventrally oriented, deeply bifurcate process.......................................................... P. debilis , sp. nov.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Diptera

Family

Ephydridae

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF