Notonyx rayneri, Ng, Peter K. L. & Clark, Paul F., 2010
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.196041 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6207351 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A087C4-FFE7-4D16-61FE-3E5F007FCABA |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Notonyx rayneri |
status |
sp. nov. |
Notonyx rayneri View in CoL n. sp.
( Figs. 4–6 View FIGURE 4 View FIGURE 5 View FIGURE 6 )
Notonyx nitidus View in CoL – Balss 1938: 74 (not Notonyx nitidus A. Milne-Edwards, 1873 View in CoL ).
Material examined. Holotype male (17.30 × 10.60 mm) (NHM 1858.172), stn 529, island of Vanua Levu, Nandi, Fiji, presented by Admiralty, coll. F. N. Rayner, voyage of HMS Herald.
Diagnosis. Holotype: carapace ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 A, B) transversely subrectangular, 1.63 × wider than long, frontal margin almost straight. Anterolateral margin short, entire, unarmed; posterolateral margin gently concave, slightly diverging towards posterior part. Dorsal surface of carapace smooth, without indication of regions except for relatively shallow gastro-cardiac grooves; dorsal surface convex anteriorly, gently convex posteriorly. Eyes filling orbit ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 C); cornea pigmented, small. Small gape present between third maxillipeds ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 A) when closed; merus quadrate, anterior margin gently concave, slightly shorter than ischium; anteroexternal angle of merus just above tip of exopod. Chela ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 D, E) with outer surfaces almost smooth, punctate in parts, ventral margin with prominent keel extending almost to tip of finger; dorsal margin of propodus smooth, unarmed; inner margin of carpus with very low tooth, inner margin denticulate. Walking legs ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 A) relatively short. Thoracic sternum relatively broad; surface pitted; sternites 1, 2 completely fused, separated from sternite 3 by prominent transverse suture; sternites 3, 4 fused except for lateral parts of sutures. Male abdomen ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 B) relatively broad, third somite broadest; telson triangular, lateral margins gently sinuous. G1 ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 A–D) relatively slender, gently curved outwards, subdistal part with low hump-like structure, surface lined with numerous small spines, distal part not prominently elongated; outer lower margin with prominent spur-like projection. G2 ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 E, F) sinuous, longer than G1, distal segment longer than basal segment; junction between distal, subdistal segments with concave surface surrounded by short serrae; distal part appears spoon-shaped.
Etymology. The species is named after the surgeon on HMS Herald who collected the type specimen.
Remarks. Balss (1938: 74) reported a male (12.0 × 9.0 mm) from Namuka, Viti Levu, Fiji, without figures or comments. The present specimen from Fiji is relatively larger. They are presumed to be conspecific in view of their provenance. The specimen was originally died ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 A) but was rehydrated so the abdomen and gonopods could be studied.
The carapace form of N. rayneri n. sp. is superficially similar to N. latus although it is proportionately broader in the new species (width to length ratio 1.60 vs. 1.40). Notonyx rayneri n. sp. can also be separated from N. latus by its relatively more slender male abdomen ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 B) (cf. Ng & Clark 2008: fig. 2E), the G1 is sinuous in shape with the distal part blunt and subtruncate ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 A–D) (G1 almost straight with the distal part prominently extended and curved in N. latus, Ng & Clark 2008 : fig. 3), and the distal part of the flagellum is gently curved ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 E, F) (G2 tip is bent back on itself to form S-shaped structure in N. latus, Ng & Clark 2008 : fig. 4).
The G1 structure of N. rayneri n. sp. most closely resembles that of N. kumi but the two species differ in several features. The carapace of N. rayneri n. sp. is relatively broader (width to length ratio 1.60 vs. 1.4), the male telson is relatively broader with gently concave margins ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 B) (male telson relatively more acute in N. kumi with almost straight lateral margins, Naruse & Maenosono 2009: fig. 2a), there is a prominent spurlike projection on the outer lower margin of the G1 ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 A, B) (margin almost entire in N. kumi, Naruse & Maenosono 2009 : fig. 2b, c), the tip of the G1 is not projected beyond the swollen subdistal part ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 A–D) (distal part of G1 extends beyond the swollen subdistal part in N. kumi, Naruse & Maenosono 2009 : fig. 2b, c).
Compared to N. sagittifer n. sp., the carapace of N. rayneri n. sp. is relatively broader (width to length ratio at 1.60 vs. 1.36), the chelae are proportionately stouter ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 D, E vs. Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 C), and the G1 is relatively stouter, more sinuous, with the distal part not projecting beyond the swollen subdistal part ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 A, B) (G1 relatively longer, curved outwards with the distal part prominently elongated in N. sagittifer n. sp., Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 A, B). Although near the type locality of N. rayneri n. sp. is closest to N. nitidus ( New Caledonia), their carapace proportions, structures of the third maxillipeds, male abdomens and G1s are completely different (see Clark & Ng 2006).
HMS |
Embrapa Gado de Corte |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Notonyx rayneri
Ng, Peter K. L. & Clark, Paul F. 2010 |
Notonyx nitidus
Balss 1938: 74 |