Rovnoscydmus

Jałoszyński, Paweł & Perkovsky, Evgeny, 2016, Diversity of Scydmaeninae (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) in Upper Eocene Rovno amber, Zootaxa 4157 (1), pp. 1-85 : 41-42

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4157.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6BF4514A-892F-499F-BC1E-B7920C7A00B0

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5681768

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A187A9-2911-FFD8-FF03-C0469E95F891

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Rovnoscydmus
status

gen. nov.

Rovnoscydmus View in CoL sp. specimen 1

( Figs 14 View FIGURES 1 – 20 , 120–125 View FIGURES 120 – 122 View FIGURES 123 – 125 )

Material studied. Late Eocene of Europe , Rovno amber: sex unknown; inclusion in elongate prism of amber 11 mm long ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 1 – 20 ), collection number K-25702 ( SIZK).

Description. Body ( Figs 120–125 View FIGURES 120 – 122 View FIGURES 123 – 125 ) elongate, slender and relatively strongly convex, light brown; BL 1.00 mm.

Head ( Figs 120–121 View FIGURES 120 – 122 , 123–124 View FIGURES 123 – 125 ) broadest at eyes, HL 0.20 mm, HW about 0.13 mm; vertex and frons confluent, together subtrapezoidal and moderately transverse; supraantennal tubercles weakly raised but distinct; compound eyes large, strongly convex, oval; tempora distinctly shorter than eyes. Punctures on frons and vertex ( Fig. 123 View FIGURES 123 – 125 ) fine and unremarkable, separated by spaces 3–4 × as wide as diameters of punctures; setae ( Fig. 123 View FIGURES 123 – 125 ) sparse, short and nearly recumbent. Antennae ( Figs 120–121 View FIGURES 120 – 122 , 123–124 View FIGURES 123 – 125 ) much shorter than half BL, AnL 0.40 mm, antennal club not demarcated; antennomeres I–II elongate, III–IV about as long as broad or slightly elongate, V–VII about as long as broad, VIII transverse, IX and X distinctly transverse, XI much shorter than IX–X combined, about 1.3 × as long as broad, with rounded apex.

Pronotum ( Figs 120 View FIGURES 120 – 122 , 123 View FIGURES 123 – 125 ) elongate, broadest site not possible to define; PL 0.25 mm, PW 0.20 mm; punctures on disc ( Fig. 123 View FIGURES 123 – 125 ) small but distinct, separated by spaces 3–4 × as wide as diameters of punctures; setae ( Fig. 123 View FIGURES 123 – 125 ) short and sparse, nearly recumbent, on sides of pronotum replaced by distinct thick bristles.

Elytra ( Figs 120 View FIGURES 120 – 122 , 123 View FIGURES 123 – 125 ) elongate oval, strongly convex, broadest site not possible to define, EL 0.55 mm, EW 0.30 mm, EI 1.83; punctures and setae similar to those on pronotum ( Fig. 123 View FIGURES 123 – 125 ).

Legs ( Figs 120–125 View FIGURES 120 – 122 View FIGURES 123 – 125 ) moderately long, slender, unmodified.

Remarks. This specimen differs from R. frontalis and R. microscopicus in proportions of body parts, but its external characters are unremarkable and do not allow for a reliable diagnosis of a new species. Structures of the mesoventrite are exceptionally well exposed in this inclusion ( Fig. 125 View FIGURES 123 – 125 ).

SIZK

Schmaulhausen Institute of Zoology

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Staphylinidae

Tribe

Glandulariini

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF