Eresus moravicus Řezáč, 2008
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4851.3.6 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E171BA74-EF7E-4872-80FC-A1FDEB46D214 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4408251 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A187D0-FFBD-FF81-FF0F-D13FFAC0F89B |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Eresus moravicus Řezáč, 2008 |
status |
|
Eresus moravicus Řezáč, 2008 View in CoL
Figs 24 View FIGURES 20–25 , 32–33 View FIGURES 26–33
Eresus moravicus Řezáč, in Řezáč et al. 2008: 274 View in CoL , figs 2K–Q, 3K–Q, 4B, E, H, K, 5B, E (♂ ♀); Kovács et al. 2015: 14, figs 1C–D, 3D–F, 7B (♂ ♀).
For the full list of taxonomic entries, see World Spider Catalog (2020).
Material examined. 1♂ (CASENT 9037134): HUNGARY: Borsod Abaúj Zemplén County: Füzér , Castle hill, 10.VII.2006 (G. Kovács & Cs. Szinetár) .
Diagnosis. Per Řezáč et al. (2008), males of this species can be recognized by the high and bulky pars cephalica, domed in front of the PMEs ( Fig. 32 View FIGURES 26–33 ). By the morphology of the copulatory organs, it can be distinguished by the more rectangular bulb (i.e. lower and upper sides straight, not curved), and lower lamella with a slight elevation ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 20–25 ).
Description. See Řezáč et al. (2008).
Distribution. Austria, Hungary, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Albania ( World Spider Catalog, 2020).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Eresus moravicus Řezáč, 2008
Zamani, Alireza, Altin, Çağatay & Szűts, Tamás 2020 |
Eresus moravicus Řezáč, in Řezáč et al. 2008: 274
Kovacs, G. & Prazsak, I. & Eichardt, J. & Vari, G. & Gyurkovics, H. 2015: 14 |
Rezac, M. & Pekar, S. & Johannesen, J. 2008: 274 |