Eresus lavrosiae Mcheidze, 1997
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4851.3.6 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E171BA74-EF7E-4872-80FC-A1FDEB46D214 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4408247 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A187D0-FFBF-FF81-FF0F-D167FE1FFD47 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Eresus lavrosiae Mcheidze, 1997 |
status |
|
Eresus lavrosiae Mcheidze, 1997 View in CoL
Figs 15–22 View FIGURES 15–19 View FIGURES 20–25 , 28–29 View FIGURES 26–33 , 34 View FIGURE 34–35
Eresus lavrosiae Mcheidze, 1997: 48 View in CoL , fig. 29 (♂).
Material examined. 1 ♂ ( CZMB): TURKEY: Kars Province: Sarıkamış Allahuekber Dağları Milli Parkı , 6.X.2014 (Ç. Altın) .
Diagnosis. By habitus, the males of this species can be identified by the dorsal abdominal pattern of live specimens ( Fig. 34 View FIGURE 34–35 ), which has a wide, encircling white stripe, filled with black and scattered reddish-brown patches. Preserved specimens are black with a frontally abrupt white circle ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 15–19 ). The characteristic black spots are visible on the living specimens, with a reddish pattern in their intermediate area ( Fig. 34 View FIGURE 34–35 ). Carapace slightly wider in front than in the pars thoracica ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 15–19 ), thus giving a bulbous appearance to the pars cephalica ( Fig. 28 View FIGURES 26–33 ), but different from that of E. moravicus ( Fig. 32 View FIGURES 26–33 ). By the morphology of the copulatory organs, the males can be identified by the lamella having a slight slope after the “shoulder” (arrow on Fig. 19 View FIGURES 15–19 ), the terminal tooth curved backwards ( Fig. 17, 19 View FIGURES 15–19 , 20 View FIGURES 20–25 ), thick retrolaterally ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 20–25 ) and needle-shaped ventrally ( Figs 18 View FIGURES 15–19 , 21 View FIGURES 20–25 ), similar to those of E. sandaliatus (Martini & Goeze, 1778) . Female is currently unknown.
Description. Male: Habitus as in Figs 15 View FIGURES 15–19 , 34 View FIGURE 34–35 . Total length: 10.1, carapace 4.9 long, 3.6 wide, 2.6 high. Carapace slightly wider at pars cephalica (3.9) than is in pars thoracica (3.6). Leg segments: I: 10.14 (3.21+1.52+1.89+2.0+ 1.52); II: 11.46 (2.89+2.73+1.88+2.29+1.67); III: 7.92 (2.75+1.50+1.72+1.28+0.92); IV: 9.46 (3.02+1.54+2.21 +1.60+1.09).
Live specimen ( Fig. 34 View FIGURE 34–35 ) dark-colored, with a black carapace having short sparse white setae. Abdomen black with a conspicuous white circle dorsally, with small anterior discontinuity. Black spots around sigilla visible, encompassing area with large, dark reddish-brown pattern.
Preserved specimen ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 15–19 ) black, with reddish-colored abdomen, or spots around sigilla not visible, and the area inside the white band uniformly black. Carapace black, covered with black and white short setae. White setae limited to pars thoracica and posterior part of pars cephalica ( Figs 15 View FIGURES 15–19 , 28 View FIGURES 26–33 ). Pars cephalica covered with greyish setae ( Figs 15 View FIGURES 15–19 , 28 View FIGURES 26–33 ). Chelicerae robust, covered with black setae ( Fig. 28 View FIGURES 26–33 ). Legs blackish, covered by fine greyish setae ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 15–19 ), with bands and stripes of white setae. All legs and palpal Fe with distal white ring. Mt, Ti and Pt I–II with white distal bands of joints. Ti II–IV with longitudinal white/light grey median stripe. Legs with ventral macrosetae on Mt, Ti I–IV ( Figs 15, 16 View FIGURES 15–19 ).
Palp as in Figs 17–22 View FIGURES 15–19 View FIGURES 20–25 . Tegulum roundish ( Figs 20, 22 View FIGURES 20–25 ); conductor medium in height, lamella relatively low ( Figs 17–19 View FIGURES 15–19 ), with slight “shoulder” (arrow on Fig. 19 View FIGURES 15–19 ), with well-developed, curved terminal tooth ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 15–19 ). Ventrally, terminal tooth thin, needle-shaped and straight (pointing towards 10 o’clock position, Fig. 18 View FIGURES 15–19 )). Mesal margin slightly bent; conductor’s ectal margin smooth with even curvature ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 15–19 ), converging abruptly at base ( Figs 18 View FIGURES 15–19 , 21 View FIGURES 20–25 ). Lamellar groove deep and directed away from cymbium ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 20–25 ).
Female: Unknown.
Distribution. Currently known only from the type locality in Kodzhori, Georgia, and the newly recorded locality in Kars, eastern Turkey.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.