Oosagitta thomasi, Kortenhaus & Wagner, 2013
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2013.58 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F3F3995B-7009-467F-99C1-43ED56039BFA |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3843799 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/61E0C9B7-DF5B-42C8-B5F9-479A1FE11E20 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:61E0C9B7-DF5B-42C8-B5F9-479A1FE11E20 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Oosagitta thomasi |
status |
sp. nov. |
Oosagitta thomasi sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:61E0C9B7-DF5B-42C8-B5F9-479A1FE11E20
Figs 8 View Fig , 23-26 View Figs 23-25 View Fig
Differential diagnosis
With regard to elytral coloration, O. thomasi sp. nov. differs from O. geescheae sp. nov. (with basal and apical pattern) and O. minuta comb. nov. (dark brown elytron). The basal antennomere is yellowish and all following ones are brown, while O. angolensis comb. nov. has completely brown antennae and O. anningae sp. nov and O. melanopicta sp. nov. have yellowish antennae. Only O. minuta comb. nov. has a similar antennal coloration, but is significant smaller. Clear differentiation is given by the shape of median lobe: the tectorial spures are nearly as long as tectum ( Figs 25A, 25B View Figs 23-25 ), while O. angolensis comb. nov. has a longer, more curved tectum ( Fig. 7C View Figs 5-7 ). Tectum of O. geescheae sp. nov. is spatulate ( Fig. 21A View Figs 19-21 ) and O. melanoptica sp. nov. has longer, more slender and crossed tectorial spures ( Fig. 29B View Figs 27-29 ). Median lobes of O. minuta comb. nov. ( Fig. 12A View Figs 10-12 ) and O. anningae sp. nov. ( Fig. 17A View Figs 15-17 ) are clearly different.
Etymology
Named after Sabine Kortenhaus’ husband Thomas.
Type material
Holotype
♂, “Coll. Mus. Tervuren, Nigeria: Jos, X/ XII. 1965, E. Bot Gwong /AfriGa specimen ID 1899, 15.III. 2012” ( MRAC) ( Fig. 26 View Fig ).
Paratypes
NIGERIA: 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀, same data as holotype.
BURUNDI: 1 ♂, Urundi: Bururi, -3.95/29.69, R.P. Giraudin, ex coll. Breuning ( MRAC). DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO: 1 ♂, I.R.S.A.C., Kivu, Kavimvira [Karimviza], -3.35/29.16 (Uviva), Jan. 1956, G. Marlier ( MRAC).
Type locality
NIGERIA: Jos, 9.92/8.09.
Description
MEASUREMENTS. n = 6, total length 4.65–5.50 mm (mean 5.12 mm; Fig. 23 View Figs 23-25 ); maximum height in lateral view 1.85–2.20 mm (mean 2.02 mm).
HEAD. Yellowish. Maximum width of eye to minimum distance between eyes 0.61–0.75 (mean 0.67). Maxillary palps and mandibles brown. Length of second to third antennomere 0.55–0.62 (mean 0.59), length third to fourth antennomere 0.69–0.79 (mean 0.75; Fig. 24 View Figs 23-25 ). Basal antennal article yellowish, following antennomeres brown. Antennal length to total body length 0.75–0.82 (mean 0.78).
THORAX. Yellowish like head, pronotum and disc of elytron. Pronotum with very delicate punctation. Pronotal width 1.50–1.80 mm (mean 1.65 mm), length of pronotum 0.95–1.10 mm (mean 1.06 mm), pronotal width to length 1.50–1.63 (mean 1.56). The yellowish elytron has an irregular coarse punctation. Elytral length 3.90–4.40 mm (mean 4.13 mm), maximum width of both elytra combined 2.60–3.30 mm (mean 2.97 mm), ratio of maximum width of elytra combined to length of elytron 0.66–0.80 (mean 0.72). Pro-, meso- and metathorax, abdomen yellowish. Legs yellowish, only basal part of tibia and tarsi brownish. Length of basimetatarsus to length of metatibia 0.30–0.33 (mean 0.31).
MALE GENITALIA. Median lobe broad, conical in the apical quarter, strongly curved ventrally ( Fig. 25A, B View Figs 23-25 ), apex with shortly curved tip ( Fig. 25B View Figs 23-25 ). Tectum short, very broad at base, aoical half very narrow reduces to an elongated, ventrally bent, apical point. It has comparatively short, slender tectorial spures, which are nearly as long as the tectum ( Figs 25B View Figs 23-25 ). Endophallus brush is emerging from a very broad, arrow-like structure ( Fig. 25 View Figs 23-25 ).Orifice of median lobe ovoid with a great incision ( Fig. 25A View Figs 23-25 ).
Distribution
Nigeria, Congo Basin, Burundi ( Fig. 8 View Fig ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |