Cleotomiroides Schuh
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.214852 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3509780 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A387F6-D970-5D07-06F4-FA0B4709F809 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Cleotomiroides Schuh |
status |
|
Cleotomiroides Schuh View in CoL View at ENA
( Figs. 3 View FIGURE 3 , 4 View FIGURE 4 , 5 View FIGURE 5 D–F, 7, 8, 9, 12)
Cleotomiroides Schuh, 1984: 91 View in CoL (n. gen.), type species by original designation: C. ferrugineus Schuh, 1984 View in CoL ; Schuh, 1995: 211 (cat.); Kerzhner & Josifov, 1999: 278 (cat.).
Diagnosis. Externally very similar to Cleotomiris Schuh , from which this genus can be distinguished by the slender and almost linear antennal segments II–IV, strongly protruding evaporative area of the ostiolar peritreme, noticeably broadened endosoma that is furnished apically with some appendages, and small but thick-rimmed sclerotized rings of the bursae. Detailed diagnosis and description were provided by Schuh (1984).
Discussion. The similarity between Cleotomiroides and Cleotomiris appears only superficial, judging from the structures of the antenna, metathoracic scent efferent system, and male and female genitalia.
Specimens representing several probably undescribed species of Cleotomiroides from China (Hubei), Java and Borneo are documented ( Schuh, 1984). Therefore, the distribution of this genus ranges widely from the warm temperate zones of eastern Asia to the tropical Sundaland.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Cleotomiroides Schuh
Yasunaga, Tomohide 2012 |
Cleotomiroides
Kerzhner 1999: 278 |
Schuh 1984: 91 |