Bisubcosta L. PAPP, 2006
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.12586111 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12586175 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A487CE-FFB2-F53C-E835-FE64D3EBFA6F |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Bisubcosta L. PAPP |
status |
gen. nov. |
Bisubcosta L. PAPP View in CoL , gen. n.
( Figs 126–128 View Figs 126–128 )
Type species: Bisubcosta oligoradiata L. PAPP , sp. n.
Gender: feminine.
Head globular, proboscis and palpi minute. Flagellomeres 14, flattened lateromedially, basal one much longer than broad, flagellomeres 10–13 quadrate, apical flagellomere with a cylindrical apical process ( Fig. 128 View Figs 126–128 ). Two lateral ocelli, no anterior ocellus.
Scutum not much arched. Laterotergite bare. Scutellum short quadrate. No membranous area below scutellum. Metanotum strongly conical. Prosternum quadrate (divided sagittally) and bare.
Coxae thickened and comparatively long. Tibial spurs very long (see below): 0: 1: 1.
Two longitudinal subcostal veins: Sc1 terminates in costa ( Fig. 126 View Figs 126–128 ), Sc2 ends free but close to costa. No R4 vein ( Fig. 127 View Figs 126–128 ). R1 and R5 setose dorsally. R5 very long, much downcurving, like in Macroceridae . M1–2 stalk long. Cu2 short. A1 vein short, slightly longer than half of the distance of its base to wing margin, no A2 vein but only a short shadow (fold) of a vein. Alula minute, long triangular, calypter long but low, with long hairs.
Abdomen very narrow basally (see below). Male tergite 9 much broader than long, subtriangular. Gonocoxite long and not high, consequently ventral genital opening large: much longer than broad. Gonostylus broad and thick, no basal lobe.
Second subcostal vein (Sc2) is only a Sc1-R1 cross-vein in majority of cases in Mycetophilidae . However, in Keroplatidae Sc 2 is clearly a longitudinal vein, ending in R1 radial vein, e.g. in species of Xenoplatyura . Although it may completely missing ( Xenokeroplatus ) or reduced and ends close to H vein ( Keroplatus ). Though Nauarchia MATILE and some spp. of Euceroplatus have similar R5, this form is not common in the Keroplatidae .
Bisubcosta View in CoL gen. n. does not key out to couplet 9/ 13 in MATILE’ s (1990) key, since there is no R4 vein. If we leave this character out of consideration, and since tibial microchaetae are well ordered in rows in whole their length, we may go to couplet 16: Nauarchia MATILE, 1990 View in CoL , whose antenna is similar but otherwise that is not related.
Etymology. The generic name refers to the possession of two true subcostal veins, which is exceptional.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Bisubcosta L. PAPP
Papp, L., Merz, B. & Földvári, M. 2006 |
Bisubcosta
Papp & Merz & Földvári 2006 |
Nauarchia
MATILE 1990 |