Gyrophaena (Gyrophaena) congrua Erichson 1837
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4126.3.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F0A10548-915F-4125-9E55-7569E07CCBAD |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6057770 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A687EB-FFC4-963B-FF05-9B95FB2DFA36 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Gyrophaena (Gyrophaena) congrua Erichson 1837 |
status |
|
[ Gyrophaena (Gyrophaena) congrua Erichson 1837 View in CoL ]
(Figs. 11–14)
Gyrophaena congrua Erichson, 1837: 368 View in CoL Gyrophaena congrua View in CoL ; Hochhuth, 1849: 73
Distribution. Europe ( Joy 1912, Hansen & al. 1939, Hansen 1954, Likovský 1964, Dvořák 1966, Kangas 1991, Roosileht 2003, Stan 2006, Merkl 2008, Glotov & al. 2011, Enushchenko & Shavrin 2012a, etc.), European part of Russia ( Nikitskiy & al. 1996, Starodubtseva 2008, Semenov 2007, 2009, etc.), Siberia ( Solsky 1871, Enushchenko & Shavrin 2011, 2012b, Bukhkalo & al., 2012) and Russian Far East (Maritime Province) ( Enushchenko & Shavrin 2011).
Remarks. It was recorded for Caucasus by Hochhuth (1849) from Tiflis. The presence of this species in Caucasus is not confirmed by a new material.
Bruge (2005) wrote about confusion concerning identities of G. congrua , G. fasciata and G. laevipennis . It is possible that the previous record of G. congrua by Hochhuth represents misinterpreted G. fasciata .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Gyrophaena (Gyrophaena) congrua Erichson 1837
Enushchenko, Ilya V. & Semenov, Viktor B. 2016 |
Gyrophaena congrua
Hochhuth 1849: 73 |
Erichson 1837: 368 |