Rhizoprionodon sp.
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.4202/app.2008.0077 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3D85D369-7A74-44B6-9766-7C4B8B26705B |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A6C023-FF81-4E1A-1E7D-FDC9FD56FB8E |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Rhizoprionodon sp. |
status |
|
Fig. 5H View Fig .
Referred specimens.—BCGM 9069 and 9070, SC 2009.18.9.
Comments.—These teeth are small (6 mm in total width) and imperfectly preserved, making it difficult to distinguish them from similarly toothed sharks like Sphyrna and even Physogaleus . Teeth of all of these taxa can have highly concave mesial cutting edges, as is the case with our specimens. Our specimens lack cusplets as seen on the distal blade of Physogaleus . Teeth of Sphyrna media Springer, 1940 can have concave mesial edges and convex distal heel, but we identify our specimens as Rhizoprionodon because the mesial edge is very concave, with the cusp being narrower and cusp apex more vertically oriented. Our teeth are similar to Oligocene specimens from North Carolina identified as R. fischeuri ( Müller 1999: pl. 8: 2–4), but a larger sample is needed to accurately determine the identity of these Chandler Bridge teeth.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |